Dorow P
Abt. Kardiologie/Pneumologie, Klinikum Charlottenburg, Freie Universitat, Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany.
Am J Cardiol. 1988 Feb 10;61(5):23C-26C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90480-8.
Celiprolol was compared with chlorthalidone in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study of 30 hypertensive or anginal patients with reversible bronchial obstruction. The study consisted of a 4-week placebo run-in period and a 12-week titration period during which the dose of both drugs was increased at 4-week intervals if blood pressure was not reduced adequately. The doses of celiprolol were 200, 400 or 600 mg once daily, whereas those for chlorthalidone were 12.5, 25 or 37.5 mg once daily. Entry criteria were a diastolic blood pressure between 90 to 115 mm Hg, forced expiratory volume in 1 second between 40 and 80% of predicted value, increasing by 15% or more after salbutamol inhalation and the need for occasional bronchodilator therapy. Prophylactic medication for asthma was given at a constant dosage for 1 month before the study and throughout the study. Clinical variables were not significantly changed by either drug, and neither celiprolol nor chlorthalidone had any significant effect on forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
在一项针对30名患有可逆性支气管阻塞的高血压或心绞痛患者的双盲随机安慰剂对照研究中,对塞利洛尔与氯噻酮进行了比较。该研究包括为期4周的安慰剂导入期和为期12周的滴定期,在此期间,如果血压未充分降低,两种药物的剂量均每4周增加一次。塞利洛尔的剂量为每日一次200、400或600毫克,而氯噻酮的剂量为每日一次12.5、25或37.5毫克。入选标准为舒张压在90至115毫米汞柱之间、一秒用力呼气量为预测值的40%至80%、吸入沙丁胺醇后增加15%或更多以及需要偶尔进行支气管扩张剂治疗。在研究前1个月及整个研究期间,哮喘预防药物以恒定剂量给药。两种药物均未使临床变量发生显著变化,塞利洛尔和氯噻酮对一秒用力呼气量均无显著影响。