USDA-ARS, Livestock Behavior Research Unit, West Lafayette, IN.
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
J Anim Sci. 2018 May 4;96(5):1640-1653. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky107.
Study objectives were to evaluate the impact of early life thermal stress (ELTS) on thermoregulation, stress response, and intestinal health of piglets subjected to a future heat stress (HS) challenge during simulated transport. From d 7 to 9 post-farrowing, 12 first-parity sows and their litters were exposed to thermoneutral (ELTN; 25.4 ± 1.1 °C w/heat lamp; n = 4), HS (ELHS; cycling 32-38 °C w/heat lamp; n = 4), or cold stress (ELCS; 25.4 ± 1.1 °C w/no heat lamp; n = 4) conditions, and then from d 10 until weaning all piglets were exposed to thermoneutral (TN) conditions (25.3 ± 1.9 °C w/heat lamp). During the ELTS period, respiration rate, rectal temperature (TR), and skin temperature (TS) of three mixed-sex piglets per dam were monitored daily (0800, 1200, 1600, 2000 h). At 13 ± 1.3 d of age, temperature recorders were implanted intra-abdominally into all piglets. At weaning (20.0 ± 1.3 d of age), piglets were bled and then herded up a ramp into a simulated transport trailer and exposed to HS conditions (cycling 32-38 °C) for 8 h. During the 8 h simulated transport, core body temperature (TC) and TS were assessed every 15 min. After the simulated transport, piglets were unloaded from the trailer, bled, weighed, and then housed individually in TN conditions (28.5 ± 0.7 °C) for 7 d. During this time, ADFI and ADG were monitored, blood samples were taken on d 1, 4, and 7, and piglets were video-recorded to assess behavior. Piglets were sacrificed on d 8 post-simulated transport and intestinal morphology was assessed. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED in SAS 9.4. In the ELTS period, piglet TR was increased overall (P = 0.01) in ELHS (39.77 ± 0.05 °C) compared to ELTN (39.34 ± 0.05 °C) and ELCS (39.40 ± 0.05 °C) litters. During simulated transport, TC was greater (P = 0.02) in ELHS (40.84 ± 0.12 °C) compared to ELTN (40.49 ± 0.12 °C) and ELCS (40.39 ± 0.12 °C) pigs. Following simulated transport, BW loss was greater (P = 0.01; 40%) for ELHS compared to ELTN and ELCS pigs and ADFI was reduced (P = 0.05; 28.6%) in ELHS compared to ELTN pigs. Sitting behavior tended to be increased (P = 0.06; 47.4%) in ELHS vs. ELCS or ELTN pigs. Overall, circulating cortisol was greater for ELHS (P ≤ 0.01; 38.8%) compared to ELCS and ELTN pigs. Goblet cells per villi were reduced (P = 0.02; 20%) in the jejunum of ELHS vs. ELCS and ELTN pigs. In summary, ELHS reduced thermotolerance and increased the future stress response of piglets compared to ELCS and ELTN.
研究目的是评估早期生活热应激 (ELTS) 对仔猪未来热应激 (HS) 期间模拟运输中体温调节、应激反应和肠道健康的影响。从分娩后第 7 天到第 9 天,12 头初产母猪及其仔猪分别暴露于热中性 (ELTN; 25.4 ± 1.1°C 带热灯;n = 4)、HS (ELHS; 32-38°C 循环带热灯;n = 4) 或冷应激 (ELCS; 25.4 ± 1.1°C 无热灯;n = 4) 条件下,然后从第 10 天到断奶所有仔猪均暴露于热中性 (TN) 条件下 (25.3 ± 1.9°C 带热灯)。在 ELTS 期间,每天监测每头母猪的 3 只混合性别仔猪的呼吸率、直肠温度 (TR) 和皮肤温度 (TS) (0800、1200、1600、2000 h)。在 13 ± 1.3 日龄时,将温度记录仪植入所有仔猪的腹腔内。在断奶时 (20.0 ± 1.3 日龄),仔猪被采血,然后被赶入模拟运输拖车中并暴露于 HS 条件下 (32-38°C) 8 小时。在 8 小时的模拟运输过程中,每 15 分钟评估一次核心体温 (TC) 和 TS。模拟运输后,仔猪从拖车中卸下,采血、称重,然后单独放置在 TN 条件下 (28.5 ± 0.7°C) 7 天。在此期间,监测 ADFI 和 ADG,在第 1、4 和 7 天采血,并对仔猪进行视频记录以评估行为。仔猪在模拟运输后第 8 天被处死,并评估肠道形态。数据使用 SAS 9.4 中的 PROC MIXED 进行分析。在 ELTS 期间,ELHS 组仔猪的 TR 总体升高 (P = 0.01),ELHS (39.77 ± 0.05°C) 组与 ELTN (39.34 ± 0.05°C) 和 ELCS (39.40 ± 0.05°C) 组相比。在模拟运输过程中,TC 在 ELHS (40.84 ± 0.12°C) 组中比 ELTN (40.49 ± 0.12°C) 和 ELCS (40.39 ± 0.12°C) 组更高 (P = 0.02)。模拟运输后,ELHS 组的 BW 损失更大 (P = 0.01; 40%),与 ELTN 和 ELCS 组相比,ELHS 组的 ADFI 减少 (P = 0.05; 28.6%)。与 ELCS 或 ELTN 组相比,ELHS 组的坐姿行为趋于增加 (P = 0.06; 47.4%)。总体而言,与 ELCS 和 ELTN 组相比,ELHS 组的循环皮质醇更高 (P ≤ 0.01; 38.8%)。与 ELCS 和 ELTN 组相比,ELHS 组空肠中的杯状细胞/绒毛减少 (P = 0.02; 20%)。总之,与 ELCS 和 ELTN 相比,ELHS 降低了仔猪的耐热性并增加了它们未来对 HS 的应激反应。