Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
J Anim Sci. 2020 Dec 1;98(12). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa327.
Thermal stress can result in productivity losses, morbidity, and mortality if proper management practices are not employed. A basic understanding of the relationship between animals and the thermal environment is crucial to assess the environment's impact on livestock performance. Therefore, the study objective was to evaluate whether different early life thermal stressors (ELTS) altered the temperature preference of pigs later in life. Twelve sows and their litters were randomly exposed to 1 of 3 ELTS treatments from 7 to 9 d of age: early life heat stress (ELHS; cycling 32 to 38 °C; n = 4), early life cold stress (ELCS; 25.4±1.1 °C without heating lamp; n = 4), or early life thermoneutral (ELTN; 25.4±1.1 °C with a heating lamp; n = 4) conditions. From 10 to 20 d, (weaning) all piglets were exposed to ELTN conditions. At weaning, pigs were randomly assigned to groups of 4 of the same sex and ELTS treatment. Temperature preference, where pigs freely choose a temperature, was assessed in 21 groups (n = 7 groups per ELTS treatment) using 1 of 3 thermal gradient apparatuses (22 to 40 °C). Testing began at 26 ± 1.3 d of age to give pigs time to acclimate to solid food after weaning and 1 group per ELTS treatment were tested simultaneously in each apparatus. Pigs were given 24 h to acclimate followed by a 24-h testing period. Behavior (active and inactive), posture (upright, sternal, and lateral lying), and location were documented every 20 min using instantaneous scan samples. Preferred feeding temperature was determined by the latency to empty a feeder in each location. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED in SAS 9.4. A cubic regression model was used to calculate the peak temperature preference of pigs based on the temperature pigs spent most of their time. The preference range was calculated using peak temperature preference ±SE for each ELTS treatment group. Early life thermal stress altered where pigs spent most of their time within the thermal gradient (P = 0.03) with ELTN pigs preferring cooler temperatures (peak preference of 23.8 °C) compared with their ELCS exposed counterparts (peak preference of 26.0 °C; P < 0.01). However, ELHS exposed pigs (peak preference of 25.6 °C) did not differ in their temperature preference compared with ELTN or ELCS exposed counterparts (P > 0.05). In summary, ELCS exposure altered pig temperature preference later in life indicating that ELTS can alter temperature preference in pigs.
热应激如果不采取适当的管理措施,会导致生产力下降、发病和死亡。了解动物与热环境之间的关系对于评估环境对牲畜性能的影响至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是评估不同的早期生活热应激(ELTS)是否会改变猪在后期的温度偏好。12 头母猪及其仔猪从 7 至 9 日龄开始随机暴露于 3 种 ELTS 处理之一:早期生活热应激(ELHS;循环 32 至 38°C;n = 4)、早期生活冷应激(ELCS;无加热灯时 25.4 ± 1.1°C;n = 4)或早期生活热中性(ELTN;有加热灯时 25.4 ± 1.1°C;n = 4)条件。从 10 至 20 日龄(断奶),所有仔猪均暴露于 ELTN 条件下。断奶时,仔猪随机分配到 4 个相同性别和 ELTS 处理的组中。使用 3 种热梯度设备(22 至 40°C)中的 1 种,通过 21 个组(n = 7 个 ELTS 处理组)评估温度偏好,即猪自由选择温度的情况。测试于 26 ± 1.3 日龄开始,以便在断奶后给仔猪时间适应固体食物,同时在每个设备中同时测试 1 个 ELTS 处理组。猪有 24 小时适应时间,然后进行 24 小时测试期。使用瞬时扫描样本每 20 分钟记录 1 次行为(活动和不活动)、姿势(直立、胸骨和侧卧)和位置。通过每个位置排空料斗的潜伏期确定最佳采食温度。数据使用 SAS 9.4 中的 PROC MIXED 进行分析。使用基于猪大部分时间所处温度的立方回归模型计算猪的最高温度偏好。使用每个 ELTS 处理组的最高温度偏好 ±SE 计算偏好范围。早期生活热应激改变了猪在热梯度中大部分时间的位置(P = 0.03),与暴露于 ELCS 的猪相比,ELTN 猪更喜欢较冷的温度(最高偏好温度为 23.8°C;P < 0.01)。然而,与 ELTN 或 ELCS 暴露的猪相比,ELHS 暴露的猪(最高偏好温度为 25.6°C)在其温度偏好上没有差异(P > 0.05)。总之,ELCS 暴露改变了猪后期的温度偏好,表明 ELTS 可以改变猪的温度偏好。