Suppr超能文献

进行各种运动时佩戴运动护齿的生理效应。

Physiological Effects of Wearing Athletic Mouth Pieces While Performing Various Exercises.

作者信息

Zupan Michael F, Bullinger Dyana L, Buffington Brenda, Koch Caroline, Parker Samantha, Fragleasso Steve, Fogg Taylor, Rasmussen-Woerner Shay

机构信息

Human Performance Lab, United States Air Force Academy, 2169 Fieldhouse Dr, USAF Academy, CO 80840.

Health & Wellness Innovation in Healthcare College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 1585 Neil Avenue, Columbus, HO 43210.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(suppl_1):510-515. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx155.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate physiological responses associated with exercise using two different mouthpieces compared with not using a mouthpiece. Improved performance while using the PX3 Bite Regulator (PX3) may significantly reduce the risk of concussions by allowing an athlete to better prepare, react, absorb, and/or avoid impact completely compared with the restricted breathing or mandibular instability that occurs when using mouthguards. Twenty-three subjects completed a battery of five physiological tests; the 1.5-mile run, sit and reach, anaerobic endurance, leg press, and bench press. Each test battery was completed under three conditions: wearing a PX3, wearing a mouthguard, or no mouthpiece respectfully. The PX3 resulted in significantly faster 1.5-mile run times (667.4 ± 9.4 vs. 684.9 ± 9.2 vs. 679 ± 7.9 s, p ≤ 0.05) and significantly longer anaerobic endurance runs (311 ± 23 vs. 283 ± 18 vs. 286 ± 18yds, p ≤ 0.05) compared with the mouthguard and no mouthpiece. The leg press lifts (51.8 ± 4.1 vs. 46.0 ± 4.3, p ≤ 0.05) while wearing the PX3 were significantly greater than when wearing a mouthguard. There were improvements, but no significant differences for sit and reach (16.8 ± 0.8 vs. 15.9 ± 0.8 vs. 16.4 ± 0.8 in., p = 0.73) and bench press (17.7 ± 1.8 vs. 17.2 ± 1.6 vs. 17.2 ± 1.7 lifts, p = 0.94). The increased performance with the PX3 could be a result of better jaw alignment and/or decreased resistance to airflow.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估使用两种不同的咬嘴与不使用咬嘴相比,与运动相关的生理反应。与使用护齿器时出现的呼吸受限或下颌不稳定相比,使用PX3咬嘴调节器(PX3)时表现的改善可能会显著降低脑震荡风险,因为它能让运动员更好地准备、反应、吸收和/或完全避免撞击。23名受试者完成了一系列五项生理测试:1.5英里跑、坐位体前屈、无氧耐力、腿举和卧推。每个测试组在三种条件下完成:分别佩戴PX3、佩戴护齿器或不使用咬嘴。与护齿器和不使用咬嘴相比,使用PX3时1.5英里跑的时间显著更快(667.4±9.4秒对684.9±9.2秒对679±7.9秒,p≤0.05),无氧耐力跑的距离显著更长(311±23码对283±18码对286±18码,p≤0.05)。佩戴PX3时的腿举次数(51.8±4.1次对46.0±4.3次,p≤0.05)显著多于佩戴护齿器时。坐位体前屈(16.8±0.8英寸对15.9±0.8英寸对16.4±0.8英寸,p = 0.73)和卧推(17.7±1.8次对17.2±1.6次对17.2±1.7次,p = 0.94)有改善,但无显著差异。使用PX3时表现的提高可能是由于更好的颌骨对齐和/或气流阻力降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验