Department of Endodontics, University of Washington School of Dentistry, Seattle, WA 98195-7448, USA.
Dent Traumatol. 2012 Aug;28(4):263-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01106.x. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
Prevention of traumatic dental injuries relies on the identification of etiologic factors and the use of protective devices during contact sports. Mouthguards are considered to be an effective and cost-efficient device aimed at buffering the impacts or blows that might otherwise cause moderate to severe dental and maxillofacial injuries. Interestingly, besides their role in preventing injury, some authors claim that mouthguards can enhance athletic performance. Thus, the purpose of this controlled randomized trial was to evaluate and compare the effect of two different types of mouthguards on the athletic performance and strength of collegiate athletes.
Eighteen college athletes ranging from 19 to 23 years participated in this study. Devices tested in this study included an over-the-counter boil-and-bite mouthguard (O-Flow™ Max Under Armour®) (UA) and a custom-made mouthguard (CM). Physical tests were carefully selected by the head athletic trainer and aimed at evaluating the strength and performance. The following sequence was carried out on each test day: (i) 3-stroke maximum power ergometer test, (ii) 1-min ergometer test, and (iii) a 1600-m run. A random assignment was developed to test all three experimental groups on each test day. Following the tests, each athlete completed a brief anonymous survey aimed at evaluating the athletes' overall satisfaction with each type of mouthguard.
Custom-made mouthguards had no detrimental effect on athletic strength and performance and were reported by the athletes as being comfortable and not causing difficulty in breathing. In contrast, boil-and-bite mouthguards did not perform as well and were reported as being uncomfortable and causing breathing difficulties.
Based on the results of this study, the use of custom-made mouthguards should be encouraged in contact sports as a protective measure, without concern for any negative effect on the athletic performance of the athletes.
预防外伤性牙损伤依赖于确定病因因素和在接触性运动中使用防护设备。口腔防护器被认为是一种有效的、具有成本效益的设备,旨在缓冲可能导致中度至重度牙颌面损伤的冲击或打击。有趣的是,除了在预防损伤方面的作用外,一些作者还声称口腔防护器可以提高运动表现。因此,本对照随机试验的目的是评估和比较两种不同类型的口腔防护器对大学生运动员运动表现和力量的影响。
18 名年龄在 19 至 23 岁之间的大学生运动员参加了这项研究。本研究中测试的设备包括一种市售的热成型口腔防护器(O-FlowTM Max Under Armour®)(UA)和一种定制的口腔防护器(CM)。体能测试由运动训练师精心挑选,旨在评估力量和表现。在每个测试日,按照以下顺序进行:(i)3 次最大功率测功仪测试,(ii)1 分钟测功仪测试,和(iii)1600 米跑。为了在每个测试日测试所有三个实验组,制定了一个随机分配方案。测试后,每位运动员都完成了一项简短的匿名调查,旨在评估运动员对每种类型口腔防护器的整体满意度。
定制的口腔防护器对运动员的运动力量和表现没有不利影响,并且被运动员报告为舒适,不会导致呼吸困难。相比之下,热成型口腔防护器的表现不如定制的口腔防护器,并且被报告为不舒服并导致呼吸困难。
基于这项研究的结果,在接触性运动中应鼓励使用定制的口腔防护器作为一种保护措施,而不必担心对运动员的运动表现产生任何负面影响。