van Egmond Martje E, Eggink Hendriekje, Kuiper Anouk, Sival Deborah A, Verschuuren-Bemelmans Corien C, Tijssen Marina A J, de Koning Tom J
1Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Neurology, Ommelander Ziekenhuis Groningen, Delfzijl and Winschoten, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands.
J Clin Mov Disord. 2018 Apr 6;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40734-018-0070-x. eCollection 2018.
Diagnosis of less common young-onset movement disorders is often challenging, requiring a broad spectrum of skills of clinicians regarding phenotyping, normal and abnormal development and the wide range of possible acquired and genetic etiologies. This complexity often leads to considerable diagnostic delays, paralleled by uncertainty for patients and their families. Therefore, we hypothesized that these patients might benefit from a multidisciplinary approach. We report on the first 100 young-onset movement disorders patients who visited our multidisciplinary outpatient clinic.
Clinical data were obtained from the medical records of patients with disease-onset before age 18 years. We investigated whether the multidisciplinary team, consisting of a movement disorder specialist, pediatric neurologist, pediatrician for inborn errors of metabolism and clinical geneticist, revised the movement disorder classification, etiological diagnosis, and/or treatment.
The 100 referred patients (56 males) had a mean age of 12.5 ± 6.3 years and mean disease duration of 9.2 ± 6.3 years. Movement disorder classification was revised in 58/100 patients. Particularly dystonia and myoclonus were recognized frequently and supported by neurophysiological testing in 24/29 patients. Etiological diagnoses were made in 24/71 (34%) formerly undiagnosed patients, predominantly in the genetic domain. Treatment strategy was adjusted in 60 patients, of whom 43 (72%) reported a subjective positive effect.
This exploratory study demonstrates that a dedicated tertiary multidisciplinary approach to complex young-onset movement disorders may facilitate phenotyping and improve recognition of rare disorders, with a high diagnostic yield and minimal diagnostic delay. Future studies are needed to investigate the cost-benefit ratio of a multidisciplinary approach in comparison to regular subspecialty care.
诊断不太常见的早发性运动障碍往往具有挑战性,需要临床医生具备广泛的技能,包括表型分析、正常和异常发育以及各种可能的后天性和遗传性病因。这种复杂性常常导致诊断出现相当大的延迟,同时患者及其家属也会感到不确定。因此,我们推测这些患者可能会从多学科方法中受益。我们报告了前100例前来我们多学科门诊就诊的早发性运动障碍患者的情况。
从发病年龄在18岁之前的患者病历中获取临床数据。我们调查了由运动障碍专家、儿科神经科医生、代谢性先天性疾病儿科医生和临床遗传学家组成的多学科团队是否对运动障碍的分类、病因诊断和/或治疗进行了修订。
100例转诊患者(56例男性)的平均年龄为12.5±6.3岁,平均病程为9.2±6.3年。100例患者中有58例的运动障碍分类得到修订。特别是肌张力障碍和肌阵挛被频繁识别,24/29例患者通过神经生理学测试得到支持。在71例先前未确诊的患者中,有24例(34%)做出了病因诊断,主要是在遗传领域。60例患者的治疗策略得到调整,其中43例(72%)报告有主观积极效果。
这项探索性研究表明,针对复杂的早发性运动障碍采用专门的三级多学科方法可能有助于表型分析,并提高对罕见疾病的识别,诊断率高且诊断延迟最小。未来需要进行研究,以调查多学科方法与常规专科护理相比的成本效益比。