Hock H S, Tromley C, Polmann L
Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton 33431.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Jan;14(1):75-84. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.1.75.
A series of experiments provided evidence that the representational structure of categories comprising dot patterns is based on pattern parts and pattern configuration rather than on pattern elements. We found that similarity judgments and postacquisition classification data could not be explained in terms of element-level perceptual units, even for categories of dot patterns with seven of their eight dots in the exact same relative location. The importance of higher order perceptual units was indicated by evidence that the long-term retention of information specific to previously learned category exemplars, which is typical of natural objects, can also be obtained for artificial dot patterns, providing their structure reflects the perceptual characteristics identified in Tversky and Hemenway's (1984) study of natural objects: Members of the same category had to be perceptually distinctive at the level of pattern configuration and perceptually similar at the level of pattern parts. The level of within-category similarity for a set of categories (relative to between-categories similarity) did not predict whether item-specific information would be retained; long-term retention appears to require both within-category similarity and dissimilarity, but at different levels of perceptual structure.
一系列实验提供了证据,表明由点阵图案组成的类别的表征结构是基于图案部分和图案配置,而不是基于图案元素。我们发现,相似性判断和习得后分类数据无法用元素级别的感知单元来解释,即使对于八分之七个点处于完全相同相对位置的点阵图案类别也是如此。有证据表明,对于人工点阵图案也能获得特定于先前学习的类别范例的信息的长期保留,这是自然物体的典型特征,这表明了高阶感知单元的重要性,前提是它们的结构反映了特沃斯基和赫门韦(1984年)对自然物体研究中确定的感知特征:同一类别的成员在图案配置层面必须在感知上有区别,在图案部分层面在感知上相似。一组类别的类别内相似度水平(相对于类别间相似度)并不能预测特定项目的信息是否会被保留;长期保留似乎既需要类别内相似度,也需要类别内差异度,但处于不同的感知结构层面。