Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5372-2.
The use of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) is crucial to the prevention, control, and elimination of malaria. Using household surveys conducted in 2014-2015 by the Health Communication Capacity Collaborative project in Madagascar, Mali, and Nigeria, we compared a model of psychosocial influence, called Ideation, to examine how malaria-related variables influence individual and household bed net use in each of these countries. Evaluations of non-malaria programs have confirmed the value of the ideational approach, but it is infrequently used to guide malaria interventions. The study objective was to examine how well this model could identify potentially effective malaria prevention approaches in different contexts.
Sampling and survey designs were similar across countries. A multi-stage random sampling process selected female caregivers with at least one child under 5 years of age for interviews. Additional data were collected from household heads about bed net use and other characteristics of household members. The caregiver survey measured psychosocial variables that were subjected to bivariate and multivariate analysis to identify significant ideational variables related to bed net use.
In all three countries, children and adolescents over five were less likely to sleep under a net compared to children under five (OR = 0.441 in Madagascar, 0.332 in Mali, 0.502 in Nigeria). Adults were less likely to sleep under a net compared to children under five in Mali (OR = 0.374) and Nigeria (OR = 0.448), but not Madagascar. In all countries, the odds of bed net use were lower in larger compared to smaller households (OR = 0.452 in Madagascar and OR = 0.529 in Nigeria for households with 5 or 6 members compared to those with less than 5; and OR = 0.831 in Mali for larger compared to smaller households). Of 14 common ideational variables examined in this study, six were significant predictors in Madagascar (all positive), three in Mali (all positive), and two in Nigeria (both negative).
This research suggests that the systematic use of this model to identify relevant ideational variables in a particular setting can guide the development of communication strategies and messaging, thereby improving the effectiveness of malaria prevention and control.
使用经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN)对于预防、控制和消除疟疾至关重要。本研究使用马达加斯加、马里和尼日利亚的卫生传播能力合作项目在 2014-2015 年进行的家庭调查,比较了一种称为“意念”的心理社会影响模型,以检查与疟疾相关的变量如何影响这三个国家中个体和家庭使用蚊帐的情况。对非疟疾规划的评估已经证实了意念方法的价值,但它很少用于指导疟疾干预措施。本研究的目的是检验该模型在不同背景下识别潜在有效疟疾预防方法的能力。
各国的抽样和调查设计相似。采用多阶段随机抽样过程选择有至少一名 5 岁以下儿童的女性照顾者进行访谈。还从户主那里收集了有关蚊帐使用情况和其他家庭成员特征的额外数据。照顾者调查测量了心理社会变量,这些变量进行了双变量和多变量分析,以确定与蚊帐使用相关的重要意念变量。
在所有三个国家,五岁以上的儿童和青少年与五岁以下的儿童相比,更不可能睡在蚊帐下(在马达加斯加,五岁以下儿童的比值比为 0.441,在马里为 0.332,在尼日利亚为 0.502)。与五岁以下儿童相比,马里(比值比为 0.374)和尼日利亚(比值比为 0.448)的成年人更不可能睡在蚊帐下,但在马达加斯加并非如此。在所有国家,与规模较小的家庭相比,规模较大的家庭使用蚊帐的可能性更低(在马达加斯加,有 5 或 6 名成员的家庭与少于 5 名成员的家庭相比,比值比为 0.452,在尼日利亚为 0.529;在马里,与规模较小的家庭相比,规模较大的家庭的比值比为 0.831)。在本研究中检查的 14 个常见意念变量中,有 6 个在马达加斯加是显著预测因素(均为正),3 个在马里(均为正),2 个在尼日利亚(均为负)。
这项研究表明,系统地使用该模型在特定环境中识别相关意念变量,可以指导沟通策略和信息的制定,从而提高疟疾预防和控制的效果。