• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行为医学学会(SBM)立场声明:对含糖饮料征税以预防慢性病。

Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: Enact taxes on sugar sweetened beverages to prevent chronic disease.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jan 1;9(1):179-183. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby035.

DOI:10.1093/tbm/iby035
PMID:29648617
Abstract

The Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) encourages stakeholders to implement a sugar sweetened beverage excise tax. Sugar sweetened beverages are the largest source of added sugars in the USA and have detrimental effects on population health by increasing risks for chronic diseases. Based on existing research evidence, SBM supports an excise tax equivalent to at least 20% to meaningfully affect consumption patterns. As evidenced by research studies in Mexico and the USA, sugar sweetened beverage taxes can have positive impacts on population health and can raise significant tax revenue. To avoid potential unintended consequences that may arise from taxes to improve diet-related behaviors, it is important to monitor industry and consumer behavior in response to the tax.

摘要

行为医学学会(SBM)鼓励利益相关者实施含糖饮料消费税。含糖饮料是美国添加糖的最大来源,通过增加慢性病风险对人口健康产生不利影响。基于现有研究证据,SBM 支持征收至少 20%的消费税,以对消费模式产生重大影响。正如墨西哥和美国的研究表明,含糖饮料税可以对人口健康产生积极影响,并能带来可观的税收收入。为避免因改善与饮食相关行为的税收而可能产生的潜在意外后果,重要的是要监测行业和消费者行为对税收的反应。

相似文献

1
Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: Enact taxes on sugar sweetened beverages to prevent chronic disease.行为医学学会(SBM)立场声明:对含糖饮料征税以预防慢性病。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jan 1;9(1):179-183. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby035.
2
Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.智利 2014 年含糖饮料税与含糖饮料价格和购买量的变化:城市环境下的观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):e1002597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002597. eCollection 2018 Jul.
3
Estimating the potential of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce consumption and generate revenue.估算糖税对减少含糖饮料消费和增加税收的潜力。
Prev Med. 2011 Jun;52(6):413-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
4
Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.在大型城市环境中,对含糖和人工加糖饮料征收饮料税后,连锁零售商的饮料价格和销售额的变化情况。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4249.
5
Development of a sweetened beverage tax, Philippines.菲律宾含糖饮料税的制定。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):154-159. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.220459. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
6
Sugar-sweetened beverage tax: the inconvenient truths.含糖饮料税:难以忽视的真相。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Dec;20(18):3225-3227. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003330.
7
Evaluating the 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Chile: An observational study in urban areas.评估智利 2014 年含糖饮料税:城市地区的观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):e1002596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002596. eCollection 2018 Jul.
8
In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.在墨西哥,实施含糖饮料税后两年消费者持续反应的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):564-571. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
9
Corporations' use and misuse of evidence to influence health policy: a case study of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation.企业对证据的使用和滥用以影响健康政策:以含糖饮料征税为例的案例研究。
Global Health. 2019 Sep 25;15(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0495-5.
10
Exploring perceptions of the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverage tax among adolescents in north-west Mexico: a qualitative study.探讨墨西哥西北部青少年对含糖饮料征税的看法:一项定性研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Feb;21(3):618-626. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002695. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of the form of sugar (solid vs. beverage) on body weight and fMRI activation: A randomized controlled pilot study.糖的形式(固体与饮料)对体重和 fMRI 激活的影响:一项随机对照初步研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 17;16(5):e0251700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251700. eCollection 2021.
2
Costs, equity and acceptability of three policies to prevent obesity: A narrative review to support policy development.预防肥胖的三项政策的成本、公平性及可接受性:支持政策制定的叙述性综述
Obes Sci Pract. 2020 Jul 10;6(5):562-583. doi: 10.1002/osp4.423. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Results of a Mass Media Campaign in South Africa to Promote a Sugary Drinks Tax.
南非大众媒体宣传含糖饮料税的结果。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 23;12(6):1878. doi: 10.3390/nu12061878.
4
Insights on the Influence of Sugar Taxes on Obesity Prevention Efforts.关于糖税对预防肥胖工作影响的见解。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2019 Dec;8(4):333-339. doi: 10.1007/s13668-019-00282-4.