• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建模相互依存的基础设施系统的联合恢复策略。

Modeling joint restoration strategies for interdependent infrastructure systems.

机构信息

Research Center of Modern Service Science and Technology, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Financial Information Technology, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195727. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0195727
PMID:29649300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5897001/
Abstract

Life in the modern world depends on multiple critical services provided by infrastructure systems which are interdependent at multiple levels. To effectively respond to infrastructure failures, this paper proposes a model for developing optimal joint restoration strategy for interdependent infrastructure systems following a disruptive event. First, models for (i) describing structure of interdependent infrastructure system and (ii) their interaction process, are presented. Both models are considering the failure types, infrastructure operating rules and interdependencies among systems. Second, an optimization model for determining an optimal joint restoration strategy at infrastructure component level by minimizing the economic loss from the infrastructure failures, is proposed. The utility of the model is illustrated using a case study of electric-water systems. Results show that a small number of failed infrastructure components can trigger high level failures in interdependent systems; the optimal joint restoration strategy varies with failure occurrence time. The proposed models can help decision makers to understand the mechanisms of infrastructure interactions and search for optimal joint restoration strategy, which can significantly enhance safety of infrastructure systems.

摘要

现代生活依赖于基础设施系统提供的多种关键服务,这些服务在多个层面上相互依存。为了有效地应对基础设施故障,本文提出了一种在破坏性事件发生后为相互依存的基础设施系统制定最优联合恢复策略的模型。首先,提出了(i)描述相互依存的基础设施系统结构和(ii)它们的相互作用过程的模型。这两个模型都考虑了故障类型、基础设施运行规则和系统之间的相互依赖性。其次,提出了一个通过最小化基础设施故障造成的经济损失来确定基础设施组件级别最优联合恢复策略的优化模型。通过电水系统的案例研究说明了模型的实用性。结果表明,少量基础设施组件的故障会引发相互依存系统的高级别故障;最优联合恢复策略随故障发生时间而变化。所提出的模型可以帮助决策者了解基础设施交互的机制并寻找最优的联合恢复策略,这可以显著提高基础设施系统的安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/4f9a3c63db5c/pone.0195727.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/ff86fc7e2e1b/pone.0195727.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/3e232de86225/pone.0195727.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/48b7d93258e0/pone.0195727.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/1a5ba33fba08/pone.0195727.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/f346e3be894c/pone.0195727.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/693a42a94127/pone.0195727.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/6296ff1d541a/pone.0195727.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/4f9a3c63db5c/pone.0195727.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/ff86fc7e2e1b/pone.0195727.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/3e232de86225/pone.0195727.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/48b7d93258e0/pone.0195727.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/1a5ba33fba08/pone.0195727.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/f346e3be894c/pone.0195727.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/693a42a94127/pone.0195727.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/6296ff1d541a/pone.0195727.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b0/5897001/4f9a3c63db5c/pone.0195727.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling joint restoration strategies for interdependent infrastructure systems.建模相互依存的基础设施系统的联合恢复策略。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195727. eCollection 2018.
2
Probabilistic Multiple Hazard Resilience Model of an Interdependent Infrastructure System.相互依存基础设施系统的概率多灾种恢复力模型
Risk Anal. 2019 Aug;39(8):1843-1863. doi: 10.1111/risa.13305. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
3
Modeling of inter-organizational coordination dynamics in resilience planning of infrastructure systems: A multilayer network simulation framework.基础设施系统弹性规划中的组织间协调动态建模:多层次网络模拟框架。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0224522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224522. eCollection 2019.
4
State of the art in risk analysis of workforce criticality influencing disaster preparedness for interdependent systems.影响相互依存系统备灾能力的劳动力关键性风险分析的最新技术水平。
Risk Anal. 2014 Jun;34(6):1056-68. doi: 10.1111/risa.12183. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
5
Toward disaster-resilient cities: characterizing resilience of infrastructure systems with expert judgments.迈向具有抗灾能力的城市:利用专家判断来刻画基础设施系统的弹性。
Risk Anal. 2014 Mar;34(3):416-34. doi: 10.1111/risa.12133. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
6
Interdependent Network Recovery Games.相依网络恢复博弈
Risk Anal. 2020 Jan;40(1):134-152. doi: 10.1111/risa.12923. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
7
Strategic preparedness for recovery from catastrophic risks to communities and infrastructure systems of systems.社区和基础设施系统的复杂巨系统灾难性风险恢复的战略准备
Risk Anal. 2012 Nov;32(11):1834-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01930.x.
8
Game-theoretic algorithm for interdependent infrastructure network restoration in a decentralized environment.分散环境下相互依存基础设施网络恢复的博弈论算法
Risk Anal. 2024 Jul;44(7):1630-1650. doi: 10.1111/risa.14269. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
9
Do topological models contribute to decision making on post-disaster electric power system restoration?拓扑模型对灾后电力系统恢复的决策有帮助吗?
Chaos. 2014 Dec;24(4):043131. doi: 10.1063/1.4898731.
10
Optimal expansion of a drinking water infrastructure system with respect to carbon footprint, cost-effectiveness and water demand.最优扩展饮用水基础设施系统以减少碳足迹、提高成本效益和满足用水需求。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Nov 15;110:194-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
System resilience distribution identification and analysis based on performance processes after disruptions.基于干扰后性能过程的系统弹性分布识别与分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0276908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276908. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimization of cascade-resilient electrical infrastructures and its validation by power flow modeling.级联弹性电力基础设施的优化及其通过潮流建模的验证。
Risk Anal. 2015 Apr;35(4):594-607. doi: 10.1111/risa.12396. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
2
A modeling framework for system restoration from cascading failures.一种用于从级联故障中进行系统恢复的建模框架。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e112363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112363. eCollection 2014.
3
Interdependent multi-layer networks: modeling and survivability analysis with applications to space-based networks.
相依多层网络:建模与生存性分析及其在天基网络中的应用。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 11;8(4):e60402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060402. Print 2013.
4
Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks.相互依存网络中的灾难性故障级联。
Nature. 2010 Apr 15;464(7291):1025-8. doi: 10.1038/nature08932.
5
The impact of risk-averse operation on the likelihood of extreme events in a simple model of infrastructure.风险规避操作对基础设施简单模型中极端事件发生可能性的影响。
Chaos. 2009 Dec;19(4):043107. doi: 10.1063/1.3234238.
6
Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid.北美电网的结构脆弱性。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Feb;69(2 Pt 2):025103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.025103. Epub 2004 Feb 26.
7
Critical points and transitions in an electric power transmission model for cascading failure blackouts.级联故障停电的电力传输模型中的临界点和转变
Chaos. 2002 Dec;12(4):985-994. doi: 10.1063/1.1505810.