• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种类型的跑步轮在小鼠偏好、健康和福利方面的比较。

A comparison of two types of running wheel in terms of mouse preference, health, and welfare.

作者信息

Walker Michael, Mason Georgia

机构信息

Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.

Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2018 Jul 1;191:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.006
PMID:29653112
Abstract

Voluntary wheel running occurs in mice of all strains, sexes, and ages. Mice find voluntary wheel running rewarding, and it leads to numerous health benefits. For this reason wheels are used both to enhance welfare and to create models of exercise. However, many designs of running wheel are used. This makes between-study comparisons difficult, as this variability could potentially affect the amount, pattern, and/or intensity of running behaviour, and thence the wheels' effects on welfare and exercise-related changes in anatomy and physiology. This study therefore evaluated two commercially available models, chosen because safe for group-housed mice: Bio Serv®'s "fast-trac" wheel combo and Ware Manufacturing Inc.'s stainless steel mesh 5″ upright wheel. Working with a total of three hundred and fifty one female C57BL/6, DBA/2 and BALB/c mice, we assessed these wheels' relative utilization by mice when access was free; the strength of motivation for each wheel-type when access required crossing an electrified grid; and the impact each wheel had on mouse well-being (inferred from acoustic startle responses and neophobia) and exercise-related anatomical changes (BMI; heart and hind limb masses). Mice ran more on the "fast-trac" wheel regardless of whether both wheel-types were available at once, or only if one was present. In terms of motivation, subjects required to work to access a single wheel worked equally hard for both wheel-types (even if locked and thus not useable for running), but if provided with one working wheel for free and the other type of wheel (again unlocked) accessible via crossing the electrified grid, the "fast-trac" wheel emerged as more motivating, as the Maximum Price Paid for the Ware metal wheel was lower than that paid for the "fast-trac" plastic wheel, at least for C57BL/6s and DBA/2s. No deleterious consequences were noted with either wheel in terms of health and welfare, but only mice with plastic wheels developed significantly larger hearts and hind limbs than control animals with locked wheels. Thus, where differences emerged, Bio Serv®'s "fast-trac" wheel combos appeared to better meet the aims of exercise provision than Ware Manufacturing's steel upright wheels.

摘要

所有品系、性别和年龄的小鼠都会自主进行转轮运动。小鼠发现自主转轮运动有益,且这会带来诸多健康益处。因此,转轮既被用于提升福利,也被用于创建运动模型。然而,使用的转轮设计多种多样。这使得研究间的比较变得困难,因为这种变异性可能会潜在地影响跑步行为的量、模式和/或强度,进而影响转轮对福利以及解剖学和生理学上与运动相关变化的影响。因此,本研究评估了两种市售型号,选择它们是因为对群居小鼠安全:Bio Serv®的“快速追踪”转轮组合和Ware Manufacturing Inc.的不锈钢网5英寸直立式转轮。我们总共使用了351只雌性C57BL/6、DBA/2和BALB/c小鼠,评估了在自由使用时小鼠对这些转轮的相对利用率;当需要穿过带电网格才能使用时,每种转轮类型的动机强度;以及每种转轮对小鼠幸福感(从听觉惊吓反应和新物恐惧症推断)和与运动相关的解剖学变化(体重指数;心脏和后肢质量)的影响。无论两种转轮类型是同时可用,还是仅有一种存在,小鼠在“快速追踪”转轮上跑得更多。在动机方面,需要努力才能使用单个转轮的实验对象对两种转轮类型的努力程度相同(即使转轮被锁定因而无法用于跑步),但如果免费提供一个可用的转轮,而另一种类型的转轮(同样未锁定)需要穿过带电网格才能使用,“快速追踪”转轮显得更具吸引力,因为为Ware金属转轮支付的最高价格低于为“快速追踪”塑料转轮支付的价格,至少对于C57BL/6和DBA/2小鼠是这样。就健康和福利而言,两种转轮均未发现有害后果,但只有使用塑料转轮的小鼠的心脏和后肢比使用锁定转轮的对照动物显著更大。因此,在出现差异的地方,Bio Serv®的“快速追踪”转轮组合似乎比Ware Manufacturing的钢制直立式转轮更能满足提供运动的目标。

相似文献

1
A comparison of two types of running wheel in terms of mouse preference, health, and welfare.两种类型的跑步轮在小鼠偏好、健康和福利方面的比较。
Physiol Behav. 2018 Jul 1;191:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
2
Circulating levels of endocannabinoids respond acutely to voluntary exercise, are altered in mice selectively bred for high voluntary wheel running, and differ between the sexes.内源性大麻素的循环水平对自愿运动有急性反应,在因高自愿轮转跑步而选择性培育的小鼠中会发生改变,且存在性别差异。
Physiol Behav. 2017 Mar 1;170:141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.11.041. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
3
Preferences of mice, Mus musculus, for different types of running wheel.小家鼠对不同类型跑步轮的偏好。
Lab Anim. 2000 Jul;34(3):313-8. doi: 10.1258/002367700780384681.
4
The effect of voluntary wheel running on 129/SvEvTac and C3H/Ibg alcohol consumption.自愿转轮运动对 129/SvEvTac 和 C3H/Ibg 酒精摄入量的影响。
Alcohol. 2019 Jun;77:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
5
Behavioral assessment of intermittent wheel running and individual housing in mice in the laboratory.实验室小鼠间歇性轮转跑步和单独饲养的行为评估
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2005;8(3):157-73. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0803_1.
6
Effects of voluntary exercise on spontaneous physical activity and food consumption in mice: Results from an artificial selection experiment.自愿运动对小鼠自发身体活动和食物消耗的影响:人工选择实验的结果。
Physiol Behav. 2015 Oct 1;149:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.025. Epub 2015 May 27.
7
Effects of long-term voluntary wheel running and selective breeding for wheel running on femoral nutrient canals.长期自愿轮跑和轮跑选择对股骨营养管的影响。
J Anat. 2024 Jun;244(6):1015-1029. doi: 10.1111/joa.14021. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
8
Impact of wheel running on chronic ethanol intake in aged Syrian hamsters.轮跑对老年叙利亚仓鼠慢性乙醇摄入的影响。
Physiol Behav. 2012 Oct 10;107(3):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.09.011. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
9
Voluntary Wheel Running in Mice.小鼠的自主转轮运动
Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. 2015 Dec 2;5(4):283-290. doi: 10.1002/9780470942390.mo140295.
10
Mouse genetic differences in voluntary wheel running, adult hippocampal neurogenesis and learning on the multi-strain-adapted plus water maze.小鼠在自主转轮运动、成年海马神经发生以及多品系适应性水迷宫学习方面的遗传差异。
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Mar 1;280:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.11.030. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and implementation of a Dependable, Simple, and Cost-effective (DSC), open-source running wheel in High Drinking in the Dark and Heterogeneous Stock/Northport mice.在“黑暗中高饮水”小鼠和异质种群/北港小鼠中开发并实施一种可靠、简单且经济高效(DSC)的开源跑步轮。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2024 Jan 15;17:1321349. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1321349. eCollection 2023.
2
Benchmarking Enrichment Efforts in the US & Canada Across Species and Enrichment Categories.在美国和加拿大进行跨物种和富集类别比较的基准测试。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2023 Jul 5;62(4):303-316. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000071. Epub 2023 May 17.
3
Conventional laboratory housing increases morbidity and mortality in research rodents: results of a meta-analysis.
常规实验室饲养增加了研究啮齿动物的发病率和死亡率:一项荟萃分析的结果。
BMC Biol. 2022 Jan 13;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01184-0.
4
Social Buffering as a Tool for Improving Rodent Welfare.社会缓冲作为改善啮齿动物福利的工具。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022 Jan 1;61(1):5-14. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000006. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
5
Using approach latency and anticipatory behaviour to assess whether voluntary playpen access is rewarding to laboratory mice.使用接近潜伏期和预期行为来评估实验室小鼠是否因获得自愿进入围栏而感到愉悦。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 21;11(1):18683. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98356-3.
6
Deficit in voluntary wheel running in chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain models in mice: Impact of sex and genotype.慢性炎症和神经病理性疼痛模型中小鼠自主转轮运动减少:性别和基因型的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2021 Feb 5;399:113009. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113009. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
7
Preference for Exercise vs. More Sedentary Reinforcers: Validation of an Animal Model of Tetrabenazine-Induced Anergia.运动与更多久坐强化物的偏好:丁苯那嗪诱导无活力动物模型的验证
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jan 30;13:289. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00289. eCollection 2019.
8
Altered Glutamate Receptor Ionotropic Delta Subunit 2 Expression in Stau2-Deficient Cerebellar Purkinje Cells in the Adult Brain.成年脑内 Stau2 缺陷性小脑浦肯野细胞中谷氨酸受体离子型 δ 亚单位 2 表达改变。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Apr 11;20(7):1797. doi: 10.3390/ijms20071797.
9
Voluntary wheel running: patterns and physiological effects in mice.自愿性轮转运动:小鼠的模式及生理效应
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2018 Dec 10;52(1):e7830. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20187830.