Suppr超能文献

吸烟者在讨论尼古丁成瘾的遗传基础的对话中对香烟添加剂的自发评论:一项焦点小组研究。

Smokers' unprompted comments on cigarette additives during conversations about the genetic basis for nicotine addiction: a focus group study.

机构信息

Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5395-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research designed to elicit smokers' cognitive and affective reactions to information about chemicals that tobacco companies add to cigarettes ("additives") found that knowledge is limited. However, little is known about smokers' unprompted thoughts and feelings about additives. Such information could be used to shape future communication efforts. We explored the content and possible functions of spontaneous statements about cigarette additives made by smokers during a study examining reactions to learning about the genetic link to nicotine addiction.

METHODS

Adult smokers (N = 84) were recruited from a medium-sized Midwestern city. Focus groups (N = 13) were conducted between April-September 2012. Data were analyzed by 2 coders using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Comments about cigarette additives arose without prompting by the focus group moderator. Three main themes were identified: (1) discussing additives helped participants navigate the conceptual link between smoking and genetics, (2) additives were discussed as an alternative mechanism for addiction to cigarettes, and (3) additives provided an alternative mechanism by which cigarette smoking exacerbates physical harm. Notably, discussion of additives contained a pervasive tone of mistrust illustrated by words like "they" and "them," by statements of uncertainty such as "you don't know what they're putting into cigarettes," and by negative affective verbalizations such as "nasty" and "disgusting".

CONCLUSIONS

Participants had distinct beliefs about cigarette additives, each of which seemed to serve a purpose. Although mistrust may complicate communication about the health risks of tobacco use, health communication experts could use smokers' existing beliefs and feelings to better design more effective anti-smoking messages.

摘要

背景

旨在了解吸烟者对烟草公司添加到香烟中的化学物质(“添加剂”)的认知和情感反应的研究发现,人们对此类信息的了解有限。然而,关于吸烟者对添加剂的未经提示的想法和感受,我们知之甚少。这些信息可以用来塑造未来的沟通工作。我们在一项研究中探索了吸烟者在学习尼古丁成瘾的遗传联系时对添加剂的自发反应,研究中记录了他们对香烟添加剂的内容和可能功能的自发陈述。

方法

从一个中西部中等城市招募了 84 名成年吸烟者。2012 年 4 月至 9 月期间进行了焦点小组(N=13)。两位编码员使用主题分析对数据进行了分析。

结果

添加剂的评论是在焦点小组主持人没有提示的情况下出现的。确定了三个主要主题:(1)讨论添加剂有助于参与者理解吸烟与遗传学之间的概念联系,(2)添加剂被讨论为导致香烟成瘾的另一种机制,以及(3)添加剂通过加剧身体伤害提供了另一种机制。值得注意的是,添加剂的讨论中弥漫着不信任的语气,比如“他们”和“他们”,以及“你不知道他们在香烟里放了什么”之类的不确定陈述,以及“讨厌”和“恶心”等负面情感表达。

结论

参与者对香烟添加剂有不同的看法,每一种看法似乎都有其目的。尽管不信任可能会使有关烟草使用健康风险的沟通变得复杂,但健康传播专家可以利用吸烟者现有的信念和感受,更好地设计更有效的反吸烟信息。

相似文献

4
Unpacking smokers' beliefs about addiction and nicotine: A qualitative study.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Nov;31(7):744-750. doi: 10.1037/adb0000321. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Smokers' risk perceptions and misperceptions of cigarettes, e-cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapies.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Sep;37(6):810-817. doi: 10.1111/dar.12829. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
7
It's complicated: Examining smokers' relationships with their cigarette brands.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Dec;30(8):887-894. doi: 10.1037/adb0000225. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
9
Smokers' and Young Adult Non-Smokers' Perceptions and Perceived Impact of Snus and E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6807. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186807.
10
Are smokers adequately informed about the health risks of smoking and medicinal nicotine?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Dec;6 Suppl 3:S333-40. doi: 10.1080/14622200412331320734.

引用本文的文献

1
Communication challenges of a tobacco addictiveness reduction policy.
Tob Induc Dis. 2021 May 12;19:38. doi: 10.18332/tid/134747. eCollection 2021.
2
Participatory Design of a Personalized Genetic Risk Tool to Promote Behavioral Health.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Jul;13(7):583-592. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0029. Epub 2020 Mar 24.

本文引用的文献

1
"I don't believe it." Acceptance and skepticism of genetic health information among African-American and White smokers.
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jul;184:153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.053. Epub 2017 May 3.
2
How people think about the chemicals in cigarette smoke: a systematic review.
J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;40(4):553-564. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9823-5. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
3
How hearing about harmful chemicals affects smokers' interest in dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes.
Prev Med. 2017 Mar;96:144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.12.025. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
4
Public understanding of cigarette smoke constituents: three US surveys.
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;26(5):592-599. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052897. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
5
Perceptions of "Natural" and "Additive-Free" Cigarettes and Intentions to Purchase.
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Apr;44(2):222-226. doi: 10.1177/1090198116653935. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
6
Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: Progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):290-308. doi: 10.3322/caac.21340. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
7
Adolescents' and Young Adults' Knowledge and Beliefs About Constituents in Novel Tobacco Products.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jul;18(7):1581-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw009. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
8
9
Adolescents' and adults' perceptions of 'natural', 'organic' and 'additive-free' cigarettes, and the required disclaimers.
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;25(5):517-20. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052560. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
10
A study of pyrazines in cigarettes and how additives might be used to enhance tobacco addiction.
Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):444-50. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051943. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验