• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有效干预非故意伤害:最贫困 10 亿人群中的系统评价和死亡率影响评估。

Effective interventions for unintentional injuries: a systematic review and mortality impact assessment among the poorest billion.

机构信息

International Injury Research Unit, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Institute of Public Health, Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia.

International Injury Research Unit, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2018 May;6(5):e523-e534. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30107-4.

DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30107-4
PMID:29653626
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Between 1990 and 2015, the global injury mortality declined, but in countries where the poorest billion live, injuries are becoming an increasingly prevalent cause of death. The vulnerability of this population requires immediate attention from policy makers to implement effective interventions that lessen the burden of injuries in these countries. Our aim was two-fold; first, to review all the evidence on effective interventions for the five main types of unintentional injury; and second, to estimate the potential number of lives saved by effective injury interventions among the poorest billion.

METHODS

For our systematic review we used references in the Disability Control Priorities third edition, and searched PubMed and the Cochrane database for papers published until Sept 10, 2016, using a comprehensive search strategy to find interventions for the five major causes of unintentional injuries: road traffic crashes, falls, drowning, burns, and poisoning. Studies were included if they presented evidence with significant effects sizes for any outcome; no inclusions or exclusions made on the basis of where the study was carried out (ie, low-income, middle-income, or high-income country). Then we used data from the Global Burden of Disease 2015 study and a Monte Carlo simulation technique to estimate the potential annual attributable number of lives saved among the poorest billion by these evidence-based injury interventions. We estimated results for 84 countries where the poorest billion live.

FINDINGS

From the 513 papers identified, 47 were eligible for inclusion. We identified 11 interventions that had an effect on injury mortality. For road traffic deaths, the most successful interventions in preventing deaths are speed enforcement (>80 000 lives saved per year) and drink-driving enforcement (>60 000 lives saved per year). Interventions potentially most effective in preventing deaths from drowning are formal swimming lessons for children younger than 14 years (>25 000 lives saved per year) and the use of crèches to supervise younger children (younger than 5 years; >10 000 lives saved per year). We did not find sufficient evidence on interventions for other causes of unintentional injuries (poisoning, burns, and falls) to run similar simulations.

INTERPRETATION

Based on the little available evidence, key interventions have been identified to prevent lives lost from unintentional injuries among the poorest billion. This Article provides guidance to national authorities on evidence-based priority interventions that can reduce the burden of injuries among the most vulnerable members of the population. We also identify an important gap in knowledge on the effectiveness and the mortality impacts of injury interventions.

FUNDING

Partly supported by the Fogarty International Center of the US National Institutes of Health (Chronic Consequences of Trauma, Injuries, Disability Across the Lifespan: Uganda; #D43TW009284).

摘要

背景

1990 年至 2015 年期间,全球伤害死亡率下降,但在最贫穷的 10 亿人生活的国家,伤害已成为日益普遍的死亡原因。该人群的脆弱性需要决策者立即关注,以实施有效的干预措施,减轻这些国家的伤害负担。我们的目的有两个:第一,审查所有关于五种主要非故意伤害类型的有效干预措施的证据;第二,估计有效伤害干预措施在最贫穷的 10 亿人中可以挽救的潜在生命数量。

方法

我们使用残疾控制优先事项第三版中的参考文献,以及在 2016 年 9 月 10 日之前在 PubMed 和 Cochrane 数据库中搜索文献,使用全面的搜索策略查找五种主要非故意伤害原因的干预措施:道路交通碰撞、跌倒、溺水、烧伤和中毒。如果研究报告了对任何结果有显著影响的证据,则将其纳入研究范围;不根据研究地点(即低收入、中等收入或高收入国家)进行纳入或排除。然后,我们使用全球疾病负担 2015 年研究的数据和蒙特卡罗模拟技术来估计这些基于证据的伤害干预措施在最贫穷的 10 亿人中每年可避免的潜在死亡人数。我们估计了最贫穷的 10 亿人生活的 84 个国家的结果。

发现

从确定的 513 篇论文中,有 47 篇符合纳入标准。我们确定了 11 种对伤害死亡率有影响的干预措施。在道路交通死亡方面,预防死亡最有效的干预措施是限速(每年可挽救 8 万多人的生命)和酒后驾车执法(每年可挽救 6 万多人的生命)。预防溺水死亡最有效的干预措施是对 14 岁以下儿童进行正规游泳课(每年可挽救 2.5 万多人的生命)和使用托儿所照顾幼儿(5 岁以下;每年可挽救 1 万多人的生命)。我们没有找到足够的证据来开展类似的模拟,以评估其他非故意伤害原因(中毒、烧伤和跌倒)的干预措施。

解释

根据有限的可用证据,已经确定了一些关键干预措施来防止最贫穷的 10 亿人因非故意伤害而失去生命。本文为国家当局提供了基于证据的优先干预措施的指导,这些措施可以减轻人口中最脆弱成员的伤害负担。我们还发现了有关伤害干预措施的有效性和死亡率影响方面的重要知识差距。

资金

部分由美国国立卫生研究院(创伤、伤害、残疾对全生命周期的慢性影响:乌干达;#D43TW009284)的福格蒂国际中心资助。

相似文献

1
Effective interventions for unintentional injuries: a systematic review and mortality impact assessment among the poorest billion.有效干预非故意伤害:最贫困 10 亿人群中的系统评价和死亡率影响评估。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 May;6(5):e523-e534. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30107-4.
2
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
7
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.无条件现金转移以减少贫困和脆弱性:对中低收入国家卫生服务利用和健康结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub3.
8
Speed enforcement detection devices for preventing road traffic injuries.预防道路交通伤害的速度执法检测装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD004607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004607.pub2.
9
Interventions for paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose.对乙酰氨基酚过量的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 23;2(2):CD003328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003328.pub3.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

引用本文的文献

1
Bending the curve: Modeling the impact of reducing risk factors for noncommunicable diseases to control future health expenditures in Latin America and the Caribbean.扭转趋势:模拟降低非传染性疾病风险因素对控制拉丁美洲和加勒比地区未来医疗支出的影响。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 18;5(7):e0004791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004791. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of interventions to prevent drowning among children under age 20 years: a global scoping review.预防20岁以下儿童溺水干预措施的有效性:一项全球范围综述
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;12:1467478. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1467478. eCollection 2024.
3
Effectiveness of interventions for preventing road traffic injuries: A systematic review in low-, middle- and high-income countries.
预防道路交通伤害干预措施的有效性:低收入、中等收入和高收入国家的系统评价
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0312428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312428. eCollection 2024.
4
Trends in injury-related mortality among residents of Jiangsu Province from 2012 to 2021: an age-period-cohort analysis.2012 年至 2021 年江苏省居民伤害相关死亡率趋势:一项年龄-时期-队列分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 11;12:1373238. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1373238. eCollection 2024.
5
Unintentional injuries and falls in populations in Russia. The Ural eye and medical study and the Ural very old study.俄罗斯人群中的意外伤害与跌倒。乌拉尔眼与医学研究以及乌拉尔高龄研究。
Heliyon. 2024 May 17;10(10):e31348. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31348. eCollection 2024 May 30.
6
Epidemiology, risk factors, and strategies to prevent and manage poisonings due to pharmaceuticals in children in low income and low-middle income countries: A systematic review.在低收入和中低收入国家,儿童因药物中毒的流行病学、风险因素,以及预防和管理策略:系统综述。
J Glob Health. 2023 Dec 29;13:04173. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04173.
7
Burden of Childhood Injuries in India and Possible Public Health Interventions: A Systematic Review.印度儿童伤害负担及可能的公共卫生干预措施:一项系统综述
Indian J Community Med. 2023 Sep-Oct;48(5):648-658. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_887_22. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
8
Unmasking the Underlying Causes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Mortality From Intentional and Unintentional Injuries in the United Arab Emirates.揭示潜在原因:阿拉伯联合酋长国故意和非故意伤害死亡率的横断面分析
Cureus. 2023 Oct 6;15(10):e46567. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46567. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Unintentional injuries in children in the south of Iran, 2004-2019: a trend analysis of mortality rates.伊朗南部儿童意外伤害,2004-2019:死亡率趋势分析。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Oct;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002144.
10
Mega-map of systematic reviews and evidence and gap maps on the interventions to improve child well-being in low- and middle-income countries.关于改善低收入和中等收入国家儿童福祉干预措施的系统评价、证据及差距图的巨型地图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 28;16(4):e1116. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1116. eCollection 2020 Dec.