Suppr超能文献

使用口袋大小的超声设备进行压缩,以诊断近端深静脉血栓形成。

Compression with a pocket-sized ultrasound device to diagnose proximal deep vein thrombosis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Intensive Care Unit, Nîmes University Hospital, place du Pr Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France.

Department of Vascular Medicine and Laboratory, CHU de Nîmes, hôpital Caremeau, place du Pr-Debré, 30029 Nîmes cedex 9, France.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;36(7):1262-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.076. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Compression ultrasonography (CUS) is a validated technique for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), but has never been studied with pocket-sized ultrasound device (PUD). The main objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of CUS made by emergency physicians (EPs) using a PUD.

MATERIALS

This was a prospective, diagnostic test assessment, single-center study. Patients underwent VCU performed by a trained EP with PUD (CUS-PUD) for searching proximal DVT (PDVT) and were then seen by an expert vascular physician who blindly performed a duplex venous ultrasound, which was the criterion standard. CUS-PUD's diagnostic performance was evaluated by sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV).

RESULTS

The sample included 57 patients of whom 56 were analyzed. Eleven (20%) PDVT were diagnosed with CUS-PUD: 7 (64%) femoral and 4 (36%) popliteal. The CUS-PUD's Se was 100% [72%; 100%], Sp 100% [92%; 100%]. The PPV was 100% [74%; 100%], and the NPV was 100% [90%; 100%].

CONCLUSION

CUS-PUD performed with a pocket-sized ultrasound appears to be feasible in emergency practice for the diagnosis of proximal DVT. A study with a larger sample size will have to describe the accuracy.

摘要

简介

压缩超声检查(CUS)是一种经过验证的深静脉血栓形成(DVT)诊断技术,但从未使用袖珍式超声设备(PUD)进行过研究。本研究的主要目的是评估急诊医师(EP)使用 PUD 进行 CUS 的诊断性能。

材料

这是一项前瞻性、诊断性测试评估、单中心研究。患者接受了经过培训的 EP 使用 PUD 进行的 VCU(CUS-PUD)以寻找近端 DVT(PDVT),然后由一名专家血管医师进行盲法静脉双工超声检查,后者为金标准。通过灵敏度(Se)、特异性(Sp)以及阳性和阴性预测值(PPV 和 NPV)评估 CUS-PUD 的诊断性能。

结果

该样本包括 57 例患者,其中 56 例进行了分析。CUS-PUD 诊断出 11 例(20%)PDVT:7 例(64%)股静脉和 4 例(36%)腘静脉。CUS-PUD 的 Se 为 100%[72%;100%],Sp 为 100%[92%;100%]。PPV 为 100%[74%;100%],NPV 为 100%[90%;100%]。

结论

在急诊实践中,使用袖珍式超声进行 CUS-PUD 似乎可行,用于诊断近端 DVT。需要更大样本量的研究来描述其准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验