• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Self-Reported Interest to Participate in a Health Survey if Different Amounts of Cash or Non-Monetary Incentive Types Were Offered.如果提供不同金额的现金或非货币激励类型,自我报告参与健康调查的兴趣。
J Urban Health. 2018 Dec;95(6):837-849. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0237-7.
2
Effectiveness of incentives and follow-up on increasing survey response rates and participation in field studies.激励措施和后续行动对提高调查响应率和参与实地研究的效果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 5;19(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0868-8.
3
Does it pay to pay? A randomized trial of prepaid financial incentives and lottery incentives in surveys of nonphysician healthcare professionals.付费是否值得?针对非医师医疗保健专业人员的调查中预付费财务激励和彩票激励的随机试验。
Nurs Res. 2005 May-Jun;54(3):178-83. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200505000-00005.
4
Cash incentives improve participation rate in a face-to-face survey: an intervention study.现金激励提高面对面调查的参与率:一项干预研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;68(2):228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
5
Use of monetary and nonmonetary incentives to increase response rates among African Americans in the Wisconsin Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.利用货币和非货币激励措施提高威斯康星州妊娠风险评估监测系统中非裔美国人的响应率。
Matern Child Health J. 2012 May;16(4):785-91. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0780-2.
6
Risks and rewards of using prepaid vs. postpaid incentive checks on a survey of physicians.使用预付与后付激励支票对医生进行调查的风险与回报。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0565-z.
7
Higher monetary incentives led to a lowered response rate in ambulatory patients: a randomized trial.更高的金钱激励导致门诊患者的响应率降低:一项随机试验。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;68(11):1380-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.018. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
8
Perceived Impact of Incentives for Chronic Disease Prevention.预防慢性病激励措施的感知影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Apr;56(4):563-570. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.029.
9
A randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire.一项关于激励措施以提高邮寄女性健康调查问卷回复率的随机试验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003 Oct;12(8):821-8. doi: 10.1089/154099903322447783.
10
What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?邮寄健康心理学调查中,问卷长度和金钱激励对回复率有何影响?
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Nov;22(4):671-685. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12239. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Empowering Nurses to Enhance Disaster Preparedness for Individuals With Sickle Cell Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.增强护士对镰状细胞病患者灾难准备的能力:一项横断面研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70067. doi: 10.1111/inr.70067.
2
Increasing Participation and Completion Rates in Questionnaire Surveys of Primary Care Patients: Cluster-Randomized Study.提高基层医疗患者问卷调查的参与率和完成率:整群随机研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Feb 25;14:e67981. doi: 10.2196/67981.
3
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
4
Dental Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient Perceptions of Barriers to Dental Care, COVID-19 Safety Precautions, and Administration of the COVID-19 Vaccine at the Dental Office.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的口腔护理:患者对口腔护理障碍、2019冠状病毒病安全预防措施以及牙科诊所2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种的看法。
HCA Healthc J Med. 2023 Feb 28;4(1):23-34. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1403. eCollection 2023.
5
Promoting Adolescent Healthy Relationships (The About Us Program): Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.促进青少年健康关系(“关于我们”项目):一项随机临床试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):e30499. doi: 10.2196/30499.
6
Challenge Accepted! a Critical Reflection on How to Perform a Health Survey Among University Students-An Example of the Healthy Campus Mainz Project.接受挑战!关于如何在大学生中开展健康调查的批判性反思——以美因茨健康校园项目为例。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 21;9:616437. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.616437. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Financial Incentives to Physicians, Patients, or Both on Lipid Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.对医生、患者或双方的经济激励对血脂水平的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Nov 10;314(18):1926-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.14850.
2
Sample selection, recruitment and participation rates in health examination surveys in Europe--experience from seven national surveys.欧洲健康检查调查中的样本选择、招募及参与率——来自七项全国性调查的经验
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Oct 5;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0072-4.
3
A telephone survey of factors affecting willingness to participate in health research surveys.一项关于影响参与健康研究调查意愿的因素的电话调查。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 5;15:1017. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2350-9.
4
Association of Mothers' Perception of Neighborhood Quality and Maternal Resilience with Risk of Preterm Birth.母亲对邻里环境质量的认知、母亲的心理韧性与早产风险之间的关联
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Aug 12;12(8):9427-43. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120809427.
5
A combination SMS and transportation reimbursement intervention to improve HIV care following abnormal CD4 test results in rural Uganda: a prospective observational cohort study.在乌干达农村地区,采用短信与交通费用报销相结合的干预措施,以改善CD4检测结果异常后的艾滋病护理:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
BMC Med. 2015 Jul 6;13:160. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0397-1.
6
Incentives to participate in clinical trials: practical and ethical considerations.参与临床试验的激励措施:实践与伦理考量
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;33(9):1197-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 May 29.
7
A case study of a hepatitis B screening and blood pressure assesment program in Los Angeles County, 2012-2013.2012 - 2013年洛杉矶县乙肝筛查与血压评估项目的案例研究
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Feb 12;12:E19. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140373.
8
Cash incentives improve participation rate in a face-to-face survey: an intervention study.现金激励提高面对面调查的参与率:一项干预研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;68(2):228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
9
National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010.国家健康与营养检查调查:1999 - 2010年计划与运作
Vital Health Stat 1. 2013 Aug(56):1-37.
10
A qualitative study of recruitment barriers, motivators, and community-based strategies for increasing clinical trials participation among rural and urban populations.一项关于招募障碍、动机以及增加农村和城市人口参与临床试验的社区策略的定性研究。
Am J Health Promot. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):332-8. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130514-QUAL-247. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

如果提供不同金额的现金或非货币激励类型,自我报告参与健康调查的兴趣。

Self-Reported Interest to Participate in a Health Survey if Different Amounts of Cash or Non-Monetary Incentive Types Were Offered.

机构信息

Office of Planning and Data Analytics, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Research and Innovations, Department of HIV and STD Programs, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2018 Dec;95(6):837-849. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0237-7.

DOI:10.1007/s11524-018-0237-7
PMID:29654397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6286275/
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess monetary and non-monetary factors that can influence the decision to participate in a future health survey. A questionnaire was administered to eligible, low-income participants (n = 1502) of the 2012 Los Angeles County Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (LAHANES-II). Multivariable regression analyses were performed to describe factors potentially associated with future intent to participate in similar survey designs. The results of the survey suggest that, overall, female participants had a greater interest in participating under a variety of incentive scenarios. Compared to the 25-34 age group, older participants (35-44, 45-84) reported more interest to participate if $10 cash [prepaid gift/debit card], a coupon for product/travel, or a small item [e.g., granola bar, t-shirt, pen] was offered, whereas younger participants (18-24) reported greater interest for $25 cash or a coupon for product/travel. Non-Whites, when compared to Whites/Non-Hispanics, reported greater interest to participate if any of the incentives was offered. High school graduates, when compared to those with some college education, reported greater interest to participate if $10 cash, a small item, or a lottery ticket was offered. Presence of two or more chronic conditions increased interest while concerns about participation in LAHANES-II was associated with reduced interest to participate in future health-related surveys. The results suggest that both incentives and non-monetary considerations (e.g., personal concerns about participating and individual level characteristics) can influence the decision to participate in health-related surveys and offer insights into strategies that can improve response rates for these assessments that are often used to inform community planning.

摘要

本研究旨在评估可能影响未来参与健康调查意愿的货币和非货币因素。该研究对洛杉矶县健康和营养调查(LAHANES-II)中符合条件的低收入参与者(n=1502)进行了问卷调查。采用多变量回归分析描述了与未来参与类似调查设计意愿相关的因素。调查结果表明,总体而言,女性参与者对各种激励方案下的参与意愿更强烈。与 25-34 岁年龄组相比,年龄较大的参与者(35-44 岁、45-84 岁)表示,如果提供 10 美元现金(预付礼品/借记卡)、产品/旅行优惠券或小礼品(如格兰诺拉麦片棒、t 恤、笔),他们更有兴趣参与调查,而年轻的参与者(18-24 岁)则表示如果提供 25 美元现金或产品/旅行优惠券,他们更有兴趣参与调查。与白人/非西班牙裔相比,非裔报告称,如果提供任何激励措施,他们更有兴趣参与调查。与那些具有一定大学教育程度的人相比,高中毕业生表示如果提供 10 美元现金、小礼品或彩票,他们更有兴趣参与调查。存在两种或更多种慢性疾病会增加参与兴趣,而对参与 LAHANES-II 的担忧则与参与未来健康相关调查的兴趣降低有关。研究结果表明,激励措施和非货币因素(例如,对参与的个人关注和个人特征)都可以影响参与健康相关调查的决定,并为提高这些评估的响应率提供了策略思路,这些评估通常用于为社区规划提供信息。