• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脾动脉作为腹腔镜胰体尾切除术困难程度的一个简单标志。

Splenic artery as a simple landmark indicating difficulty during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

作者信息

Ishikawa Yoshiya, Ban Daisuke, Watanabe Shuichi, Akahoshi Keiichi, Ono Hiroaki, Mitsunori Yusuke, Kudo Atsushi, Tanaka Shinji, Tanabe Minoru

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Molecular Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Jan;12(1):81-87. doi: 10.1111/ases.12485. Epub 2018 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1111/ases.12485
PMID:29656597
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is increasing worldwide. It is important for surgeons to predict preoperatively the difficulty and risks of a surgery. However, very few reports have evaluated the impact of patient or tumor factors on the difficulty of LDP. We aimed to determine the predictors of technical difficulties when performing LDP.

METHODS

This study included 34 patients who underwent LDP. Patient information was obtained retrospectively and included age, gender, BMI, primary disease, previous abdominal surgery, previous pancreatitis, tumor size, tumor proximity to the splenic arterial origin, type of splenic artery (SpA), operative time, blood loss, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and length of hospital stay. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictors of a long operative time. SpA anatomy was classified into two types based on the relationship between its origin and the pancreas. Patients whose SpA origin was upward of the pancreatic parenchyma were classified as SpA type 1, whereas patients whose SpA origin was covered by the pancreatic parenchyma were classified as SpA type 2.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed SpA type 2 to be an independent risk factor for a long operation (odds ratio = 9.925; 95% confidence interval: 1.461-67.412; P = 0.019). SpA type 2 was related to a longer operative time (P < 0.001) and greater intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Classification according to SpA type is simple and useful for predicting technical difficulty when performing LDP.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(LDP)在全球范围内的应用日益增多。对外科医生而言,术前预测手术的难度和风险很重要。然而,极少有报告评估患者或肿瘤因素对LDP手术难度的影响。我们旨在确定实施LDP时技术难度的预测因素。

方法

本研究纳入了34例行LDP的患者。回顾性获取患者信息,包括年龄、性别、体重指数、原发疾病、既往腹部手术史、既往胰腺炎史、肿瘤大小、肿瘤与脾动脉起始部的距离、脾动脉(SpA)类型、手术时间、失血量、术后胰瘘及住院时间。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定手术时间延长的预测因素。根据SpA起始部与胰腺的关系将SpA解剖结构分为两种类型。SpA起始部位于胰腺实质上方的患者被归类为SpA 1型,而SpA起始部被胰腺实质覆盖的患者被归类为SpA 2型。

结果

多因素分析显示SpA 2型是手术时间延长的独立危险因素(比值比=9.925;95%置信区间:1.461 - 67.412;P = 0.019)。SpA 2型与更长的手术时间(P < 0.001)和更多的术中失血量(P = 0.001)相关。

结论

根据SpA类型进行分类对于预测实施LDP时的技术难度简单且有用。

相似文献

1
Splenic artery as a simple landmark indicating difficulty during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.脾动脉作为腹腔镜胰体尾切除术困难程度的一个简单标志。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Jan;12(1):81-87. doi: 10.1111/ases.12485. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
2
Evaluation of relationship between splenic artery and pancreatic parenchyma using three-dimensional computed tomography for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.利用三维计算机断层扫描评估腹腔镜胰体尾切除术脾动脉与胰腺实质的关系。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Sep;406(6):1885-1892. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02101-3. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
The Straightened Splenic Vessels Method Improves Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy.脾血管伸直法改善腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的手术效果。
Dig Surg. 2017;34(4):289-297. doi: 10.1159/000452498. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
[Comparison of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma].[腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术与开放性远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌的比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 23;39(10):783-786. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.10.012.
5
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms: a two-center comparative study.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗良性或癌前胰腺肿瘤的远端胰腺切除术:一项双中心比较研究。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2015 Jul;16(7):573-9. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1400257.
6
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺癌安全有效。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5633-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
7
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: preliminary experience and comparison to conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery.经脐单孔腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术:初步经验及与传统多孔腹腔镜手术的比较
BMC Surg. 2014 Dec 10;14:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-105.
8
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌:单中心经验
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017 Jun;18(6):532-538. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600541.
9
Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study.机器人手术方式提高了腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的脾脏保留率并缩短了术后住院时间:一项配对队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3507-18. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4101-5. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺腺癌
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1477-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3412-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of differences in vascular anatomy on surgical outcomes of left pancreatectomy: a retrospective study.血管解剖差异对左半胰切除术手术结果的影响:一项回顾性研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb 4;23(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03700-w.
2
Identifying the preoperative factors predicting the surgical difficulty of robotic distal pancreatectomy.识别预测机器人胰体尾切除术手术难度的术前因素。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3823-3831. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09865-3. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
Morphometric analysis of the splenic artery using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).
应用增强 CT 对脾动脉进行形态计量分析。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Mar;43(3):377-384. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02598-1. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
4
The superior approach with the stomach roll-up technique improves intraoperative outcomes and facilitates learning laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study between the superior and inferior approach.胃滚压技术的优越入路可改善术中结果,并有助于学习腹腔镜胰体尾切除术:上入路与下入路的对比研究。
Surg Today. 2020 Feb;50(2):153-162. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01855-0. Epub 2019 Jul 27.