Suppr超能文献

儿童并发照护的伦理:社会正义视角。

The ethics of concurrent care for children: A social justice perspective.

机构信息

University of Maryland, USA.

University of Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2019 Aug;26(5):1518-1527. doi: 10.1177/0969733018765308. Epub 2018 Apr 15.

Abstract

Recent estimates indicate that over 40,000 children die annually in the United States and a majority have life-limiting conditions. Children at end of life require extensive healthcare resources, including multiple hospital readmissions and emergency room visits. Yet, many children still suffer from symptoms at end of life-including fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and anxiety-with less than 10% of these children utilizing hospice care services. A critical barrier to pediatric hospice use was the original federal regulations associated with the hospice care that required a diagnosis of 6 months to live and the discontinuation of all curative treatments. The Concurrent Care Provision of the United States' Affordable Care Act eliminated the need to forgo curative therapies in order to enroll in hospice for children in Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Program. Concurrent care for children can help mitigate the tension families experience in choosing between essential forms of care, as well as contribute to improved end-of-life outcomes for the child and possibly bereavement outcomes for the family. Understanding concurrent care for children from a social justice perspective has important advocacy and research implications for hospice and palliative care clinicians providing care for children and their families. We apply Powers and Faden's theory of social justice "as the moral foundation of public health and health policy" to the provision of concurrent care to children near end of life and families in the United States. The goals of applying this theory are to explore additional insights and perspectives into concurrent care policy may provide and to assess the usefulness of this theory when applied to end-of-life health policy. We argue that concurrent care policy is socially just since it has potential to promote well-being in vulnerable children and families and can limit the inequity children at end-of-life experience in access to high-quality hospice care.

摘要

最近的估计表明,美国每年有超过 40000 名儿童死亡,其中大多数患有生命有限的疾病。生命末期的儿童需要大量的医疗保健资源,包括多次住院和急诊就诊。然而,许多儿童在生命末期仍遭受各种症状的折磨,包括疲劳、疼痛、呼吸困难和焦虑,只有不到 10%的儿童利用临终关怀服务。儿童临终关怀使用的一个关键障碍是与临终关怀相关的最初联邦法规,该法规要求诊断为存活期不到 6 个月,并停止所有治疗性治疗。《美国平价医疗法案》的同时护理规定消除了为了让儿童参加医疗补助或儿童健康保险计划的临终关怀而放弃治疗性疗法的需要。儿童同时护理可以帮助缓解家庭在选择基本护理形式时所面临的紧张局面,并有助于改善儿童的临终结局,可能也有助于改善家庭的丧亲结局。从社会正义的角度理解儿童同时护理对为儿童及其家庭提供护理的临终关怀和姑息治疗临床医生具有重要的宣传和研究意义。我们将鲍尔斯和法登的社会正义理论“作为公共卫生和卫生政策的道德基础”应用于为接近生命末期的儿童和家庭提供同时护理。应用这一理论的目的是探索同时护理政策可能提供的更多见解和观点,并评估这一理论在应用于临终健康政策时的有用性。我们认为同时护理政策是公正的,因为它有可能促进弱势儿童和家庭的福祉,并限制生命末期儿童获得高质量临终关怀的不平等。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验