Habib Aly Makram, Elsherbeny Ahmed Galal, Almehizia Rayd Abdelaziz
Department of Intensive Care, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Adult Cardiac (Surgical) Intensive Care Unit, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudia Arabia.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;22(3):168-173. doi: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_494_17.
cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can be complicated by vasoplegia that is refractory to vasopressors. Methylene blue (MB) represents an alternative in such cases.
Retrospective observational historical control-matched study. From 2010 to 2015, all patients who received MB for vasoplegia post-CPB were included in this study. Historical controls from the period of 2004 to 2009 were matched. End-points were the time till improvement of vasoplegia (Ti), 30-day mortality, cardiac surgical Intensive Care Unit (CSICU) morbidity, and length of stay (LOS).
Twenty-eight patients were matched in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in demographic, laboratory data on admission, or hemodynamic profile before use of MB. Ti and time to complete discontinuation of vasopressors were statistically significant less in MB group (8.2 ± 2.6 vs. 29.7 ± 6.4, = 0.00 and 22.6 ± 5.2 vs. 55.3 ± 9.4, = 0.00) respectively. Mortality at day 30 was significantly higher in controls compared to MB (1 patient [3.6%] vs. 6 patients [21.4%], long rank = 0.04). CSICU, hospital LOS, and incidence of renal failure was significantly higher in control group (12.4 ± 3.7 vs. 7 ± 1.4, = 0.03), (19.5 ± 2.4 vs. 10.9 ± 3.2, = 0.05) and (9 patients [32.1%] vs. 2 patients [7.1%], = 0.04), respectively. Duration of mechanical ventilation was less in MB patients; however, did not reach statistical significance.
the use of MB for vasoplegia postcardiac surgery was associated with rapid recovery of hemodynamics, shorter need for vasopressors, less ICU mortality, less incidence of renal failure, and shorter LOS.
体外循环(CPB)可能并发对血管升压药难治的血管麻痹。亚甲蓝(MB)在此类情况下是一种替代方法。
回顾性观察性历史对照匹配研究。2010年至2015年期间,所有CPB术后因血管麻痹接受MB治疗的患者纳入本研究。匹配2004年至2009年期间的历史对照。终点指标为血管麻痹改善时间(Ti)、30天死亡率、心脏外科重症监护病房(CSICU)发病率及住院时间(LOS)。
两组各匹配28例患者。两组在人口统计学、入院时实验室数据或使用MB前的血流动力学特征方面无统计学显著差异。MB组的Ti和血管升压药完全停用时间在统计学上显著更短(分别为8.2±2.6对29.7±6.4,P=0.00;22.6±5.2对55.3±9.4,P=0.00)。与MB组相比,对照组30天死亡率显著更高(1例患者[3.6%]对6例患者[21.4%],长秩检验P=0.04)。对照组的CSICU、住院LOS及肾衰竭发生率显著更高(分别为12.4±3.7对7±1.4,P=0.03),(19.5±2.4对10.9±3.2,P=0.05)以及(9例患者[32.1%]对2例患者[7.1%],P=0.04)。MB组患者机械通气时间较短;然而,未达到统计学显著性。
心脏手术后使用MB治疗血管麻痹与血流动力学快速恢复、血管升压药需求时间缩短、ICU死亡率降低、肾衰竭发生率降低及住院LOS缩短相关。