Mankapure Pritam Kumar, Barpande Suresh R, Bhavthankar Jyoti D
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017 Sep-Dec;9(3):153-156. doi: 10.4103/jfo.jfds_13_16.
In exhibiting gender dimorphism, the bony pelvis and skull give the most reliable results from morphometric analysis. Palatal dimensions were reported to exhibit racial difference and sexual dimorphism in several studies.
The aim of the present study was to measure the maxillary arch depth and palatal depth in Indian population to assess their use as a tool for sexual dimorphism.
Two hundred and fifty males and 250 females in the age group of 17-25 years were enrolled in the study, and impressions of maxillary arch were made. Measurement of palatal depth and maxillary arch depth was carried out at specific reference points using Korkhaus compass and digital caliper, respectively. The comparison of maxillary arch depth and palatal depth values was done using independent -test. < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Diagnostic performance of significantly different variable was quantified by plotting "receiver operating characteristic" (ROC) curve.
Arch depth mean values were significantly higher in males than females. However, palatal depth mean values, though higher in males, were not significant. Area under the curve in ROC curve for maxillary arch depth was found to be 0.76, indicating sufficiency of discriminatory power of this variable.
The present study showed that maxillary arch depth can be used as a tool for sex determination along with other morphometric methods. Mean value of both maxillary arch depth and palatal depth can be used as the baseline value for given population to be used as a reference for further studies.
在表现出性别二态性方面,骨盆和颅骨通过形态测量分析能得出最可靠的结果。多项研究报道称,腭部尺寸存在种族差异和性别二态性。
本研究的目的是测量印度人群的上颌弓深度和腭部深度,以评估其作为性别二态性判定工具的效用。
本研究纳入了250名年龄在17至25岁之间的男性和250名女性,并制取了上颌弓印模。分别使用科尔豪斯圆规和数字卡尺在特定参考点测量腭部深度和上颌弓深度。使用独立样本t检验对上颌弓深度和腭部深度值进行比较。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。通过绘制“受试者工作特征”(ROC)曲线来量化显著不同变量的诊断性能。
男性的弓深度平均值显著高于女性。然而,腭部深度平均值虽然男性更高,但差异不显著。上颌弓深度的ROC曲线下面积为0.76,表明该变量具有足够的鉴别力。
本研究表明,上颌弓深度可与其他形态测量方法一起用作性别判定工具。上颌弓深度和腭部深度的平均值均可作为给定人群的基线值,以供进一步研究参考。