Inoue Satoshi, Saito Yoji, Tsuneto Satoru, Aruga Etsuko, Takahashi Hiroshi, Uemori Mitsutoshi
Clinical Development Department, R&D Division, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Tokyo.
Department of Anesthesiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;48(6):542-547. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy038.
Hydromorphone is a standard opioid analgesic for cancer pain that, prior to this study, was not approved in Japan, where options for opioid switching are limited. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of hydromorphone (DS-7113b) immediate-release tablets in opioid-naïve cancer patients with moderate to severe cancer pain.
Multicenter, active-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority study of 183 cancer patients over 20 years of age at 50 clinical sites in Japan. Hydromorphone tablets or oxycodone hydrochloride powder was orally administered four times daily for 5 days. The initial doses of hydromorphone and oxycodone hydrochloride were 4 mg/day and 10 mg/day, respectively, and adjusted as necessary. Efficacy was evaluated as the intergroup difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the least squares mean by analysis of covariance, using the baseline visual analog scale (VAS) as a covariate for change in VAS score at treatment completion/discontinuation in the full analysis set.
Non-inferiority of hydromorphone versus oxycodone was confirmed, with an intergroup difference (95% CI) in the least squares mean of -3.4 mm (-9.8 to 3.1 mm) for change in VAS scores, which was below the upper limit of the 95% CI at 10 mm, the non-inferiority limit determined during study planning. Adverse events occurred in 83.0% (73/88) of patients in the hydromorphone group and 77.4% (65/84) in the oxycodone group. The most frequently observed adverse events were somnolence, constipation, vomiting and nausea.
The efficacy and safety of hydromorphone tablets are equivalent to those of oxycodone immediate-release powder.
氢吗啡酮是用于癌症疼痛的标准阿片类镇痛药,在本研究之前,它在日本未获批准,而在日本阿片类药物转换的选择有限。我们旨在研究氢吗啡酮(DS - 7113b)速释片在初用阿片类药物的中重度癌症疼痛患者中的疗效和安全性。
在日本50个临床地点对183名20岁以上的癌症患者进行多中心、活性对照、随机、双盲、平行组、非劣效性研究。氢吗啡酮片或盐酸羟考酮粉每日口服4次,共5天。氢吗啡酮和盐酸羟考酮的初始剂量分别为4毫克/天和10毫克/天,并根据需要进行调整。通过协方差分析评估疗效,以基线视觉模拟评分(VAS)作为全分析集中治疗结束/停药时VAS评分变化的协变量,计算组间最小二乘均值差异(95%置信区间[CI])。
证实氢吗啡酮相对于羟考酮具有非劣效性,VAS评分变化的组间最小二乘均值差异(95%CI)为-3.4毫米(-9.8至3.1毫米),低于研究计划确定的非劣效性界限10毫米的95%CI上限。氢吗啡酮组83.0%(73/88)的患者和羟考酮组77.4%(65/84)的患者发生了不良事件。最常观察到的不良事件是嗜睡、便秘、呕吐和恶心。
氢吗啡酮片的疗效和安全性与盐酸羟考酮速释粉相当。