• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Yield of Colonoscopy After a Positive Result From a Fecal Immunochemical Test OC-Light.OC-Light 便潜血免疫化学法检测阳性后的结肠镜检查的检出率。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;16(10):1593-1597.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
2
Performance of OC-Auto Micro 80 Fecal Immunochemical Test in an Integrated Academic-Community Health System.OC-Auto Micro 80 粪便免疫化学测试在综合学术-社区卫生系统中的性能。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 1;58(6):602-606. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001928.
3
Fecal Immunochemical Test Program Performance Over 4 Rounds of Annual Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study.四轮年度筛查中粪便免疫化学检测项目的表现:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 5;164(7):456-63. doi: 10.7326/M15-0983. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
4
Diagnostic Yield of One-Time Colonoscopy vs One-Time Flexible Sigmoidoscopy vs Multiple Rounds of Mailed Fecal Immunohistochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening.在结直肠癌筛查中,一次性结肠镜检查与一次性乙状结肠镜检查和多次邮寄粪便免疫化学检测的诊断收益比较。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;18(3):667-675.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
5
Equivalency of fecal immunochemical tests and colonoscopy in familial colorectal cancer screening.粪便免疫化学检测与结肠镜检查在家族性结直肠癌筛查中的等效性。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Nov;147(5):1021-30.e1; quiz e16-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
6
Lower Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Cut-Off Values Improve Detection of Colorectal Cancer in System-Level Screens.较低的粪便免疫化学检测截断值可提高系统层面筛查结直肠癌的检出率。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;18(3):647-653. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.077. Epub 2019 May 11.
7
Positive predictive values of fecal immunochemical tests used in the STOP CRC pragmatic trial.STOP CRC 实用试验中使用的粪便免疫化学检测的阳性预测值。
Cancer Med. 2018 Sep;7(9):4781-4790. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1727. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
8
Effects of Increasing Screening Age and Fecal Hemoglobin Cutoff Concentrations in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.增加结直肠癌筛查计划的筛查年龄和粪便血红蛋白截断浓度的效果。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec;14(12):1771-1777. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
9
Equivalent Accuracy of 2 Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Detecting Advanced Neoplasia in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.两种定量粪便免疫化学检测在有组织结直肠癌筛查项目中检测高级别腺瘤的准确性相当。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1392-1399.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
10
Long-term performance of colorectal cancerscreening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test.基于粪便免疫化学试验的结直肠癌筛查方案的长期效果。
Gut. 2018 Dec;67(12):2124-2130. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314753. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Validation of a Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Blood Test to Screen for Colorectal Cancer.一种基于循环肿瘤DNA的血液检测用于筛查结直肠癌的临床验证
JAMA. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.7515.
2
A Comparative Environmental Impact Analysis of Screening Tests for Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌筛查试验的比较环境影响分析
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 15:2025.01.14.25320553. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.14.25320553.
3
Electronic Coding for Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Is Associated With Increased Colonoscopy Completion.电子编码异常粪便免疫化学检测与结肠镜检查完成率增加相关。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 1;119(7):1431-1432. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002754. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
Blood-based tests for multicancer early detection (PATHFINDER): a prospective cohort study.基于血液的多种癌症早期检测(PATHFINDER):一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2023 Oct 7;402(10409):1251-1260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01700-2.
5
Evaluation of Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy Utilization for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Georgia, USA.美国乔治亚州结肠镜检查和乙状结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查的评估。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 20;29(11):8955-8966. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29110703.
6
Adaptation of colorectal cancer screening tailored navigation content for American Indian communities and early results using the intervention.为美国印第安社区量身定制的结直肠癌筛查导航内容的调整及使用该干预措施的早期结果。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jan 28;3(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00253-x.
7
Effectiveness of a mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach: a Medicare Advantage pilot study.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测外展服务的有效性:一项医疗保险优势试点研究。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep 9;13:1756284820945388. doi: 10.1177/1756284820945388. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2014, Featuring Survival.《1975 - 2014年美国癌症现状年度报告:聚焦生存率》
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Sep 1;109(9). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx030.
2
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017.结直肠癌统计数据,2017 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 May 6;67(3):177-193. doi: 10.3322/caac.21395. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
Inadequate Utilization of Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal FIT Results in an Integrated Safety-Net System.综合安全网系统中粪便免疫化学检测结果异常后诊断性结肠镜检查的利用不足
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb;112(2):375-382. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.555. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
4
Beyond Colonoscopy: The Role of Alternative Screening Tests for Colorectal Cancer in Your Practice.超越结肠镜检查:替代筛查测试在您的实践中对结直肠癌的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;112(1):8-10. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.504. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
5
Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌美国多学会专家组关于粪便免疫化学检测用于结直肠肿瘤筛查的共识声明。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Apr;152(5):1217-1237.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.053. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
6
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2576-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3332.
7
Colorectal cancer screening: 80% by 2018. Colonoscopists simply cannot do it alone.结直肠癌筛查:到2018年达到80%。仅仅靠结肠镜检查医生是无法独自完成的。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):552-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.023.
8
Public health impact of achieving 80% colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States by 2018.到2018年在美国实现80%的结直肠癌筛查率对公共卫生的影响。
Cancer. 2015 Jul 1;121(13):2281-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29336. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
9
Gender Differences in Fecal Immunochemical Test Performance for Early Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia.性别差异对粪便免疫化学试验检测结直肠肿瘤的影响。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug;13(8):1464-71.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.023. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
10
Test characteristics of faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) compared with optical colonoscopy.粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)与光学结肠镜检查的比较的检测特性。
J Med Screen. 2014 Sep;21(3):133-43. doi: 10.1177/0969141314541109. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

OC-Light 便潜血免疫化学法检测阳性后的结肠镜检查的检出率。

Yield of Colonoscopy After a Positive Result From a Fecal Immunochemical Test OC-Light.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Vallejo, California.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;16(10):1593-1597.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.014
PMID:29660528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6151285/
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is widely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The OC-Light FIT is 1 of 2 FITs recommended for CRC screening by the Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. However, little is known about its ability to detect CRC in large average-risk populations.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients (50-75 years old) in the San Francisco Health Network who were screened for CRC by OC-Light FIT from August 2010 through June 2015. Patients with a positive result were referred for colonoscopy. We used electronic health records to identify participants with positive FIT results, and collected results from subsequent colonoscopies and pathology analyses. The FIT positive rate was calculated by dividing the number of positive FIT results by the total number of FIT tests completed. The primary outcome was the positive rate from OC-Light FIT and yield of neoplasms at colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes were findings from first vs subsequent rounds of testing, and how these varied by sex and race.

RESULTS

We collected result from 35,318 FITs, performed on 20,886 patients; 2930 patients (8.3%) had a positive result, and 1558 patients completed the follow-up colonoscopy. A positive result from the FIT identified patients with CRC with a positive predictive value of 3.0%, and patients with advanced adenoma with a positive predictive value of 20.8%. The FIT positive rate was higher during the first round of testing (9.4%) compared to subsequent rounds (7.4%) (P < .01). The yield of CRC in patients with a positive result from the first round of the FIT was 3.7%, and decreased to 1.8% for subsequent rounds (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective analysis of patients in a diverse safety-net population who underwent OC-Light FIT for CRC screening, we found that approximately 3% of patients with a positive result from a FIT to have CRC and approximately 21% to have advanced adenoma.

摘要

背景与目的

粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)广泛应用于结直肠癌(CRC)筛查。OC-Light FIT 是预防服务工作组指南推荐用于 CRC 筛查的两种 FIT 之一。然而,对于其在大型普通风险人群中检测 CRC 的能力,我们知之甚少。

方法

我们对旧金山健康网络中接受 OC-Light FIT 筛查的 50-75 岁患者进行了回顾性队列研究,筛查时间为 2010 年 8 月至 2015 年 6 月。阳性结果的患者被转诊行结肠镜检查。我们使用电子健康记录来识别阳性 FIT 结果的参与者,并收集随后的结肠镜检查和病理分析结果。阳性 FIT 率通过阳性 FIT 结果数量除以完成的 FIT 测试总数来计算。主要结局是 OC-Light FIT 的阳性率和结肠镜检查中肿瘤的检出率。次要结局是第一轮和后续轮次检测的结果,以及这些结果如何因性别和种族而异。

结果

我们收集了 35318 次 FIT 检测结果,共对 20886 名患者进行了检测;2930 名患者(8.3%)的结果为阳性,1558 名患者完成了随访结肠镜检查。FIT 的阳性结果确定了 CRC 患者,其阳性预测值为 3.0%,高级别腺瘤患者的阳性预测值为 20.8%。第一轮检测的 FIT 阳性率(9.4%)高于后续轮次(7.4%)(P<.01)。第一轮 FIT 阳性结果患者的 CRC 检出率为 3.7%,后续轮次的检出率为 1.8%(P=.02)。

结论

在一项对接受 OC-Light FIT 进行 CRC 筛查的多样性医疗保障人群患者的回顾性分析中,我们发现,约 3%的 FIT 阳性结果患者患有 CRC,约 21%的患者患有高级别腺瘤。