Aston Brain Centre, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Postbus 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jun;129(6):1221-1229. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.12.040. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
Kurtosis beamforming is a useful technique for analysing magnetoencephalograpy (MEG) data containing epileptic spikes. However, the implementation varies and few studies measure concordance with subsequently resected areas. We evaluated kurtosis beamforming as a means of localizing spikes in drug-resistant epilepsy patients.
We retrospectively applied kurtosis beamforming to MEG recordings of 22 epilepsy patients that had previously been analysed using equivalent current dipole (ECD) fitting. Virtual electrodes were placed in the kurtosis volumetric peaks and visually inspected to select a candidate source. The candidate sources were compared to the ECD localizations and resection areas.
The kurtosis beamformer produced interpretable localizations in 18/22 patients, of which the candidate source coincided with the resection lobe in 9/13 seizure-free patients and in 3/5 patients with persistent seizures. The sublobar accuracy of the kurtosis beamformer with respect to the resection zone was higher than ECD (56% and 50%, respectively), however, ECD resulted in a higher lobar accuracy (75%, 67%).
Kurtosis beamforming may provide additional value when spikes are not clearly discernible on the sensors and support ECD localizations when dipoles are scattered.
Kurtosis beamforming should be integrated with existing clinical protocols to assist in localizing the epileptogenic zone.
峭度波束形成是一种分析包含癫痫棘波的脑磁图(MEG)数据的有用技术。然而,其实现方式各不相同,并且很少有研究测量其与随后切除区域的一致性。我们评估了峭度波束形成作为一种定位耐药性癫痫患者棘波的方法。
我们回顾性地将峭度波束形成应用于 22 名癫痫患者的 MEG 记录,这些患者之前已经使用等效电流偶极子(ECD)拟合进行了分析。虚拟电极放置在峭度体峰值处,并进行视觉检查以选择候选源。候选源与 ECD 定位和切除区域进行比较。
峭度波束形成器在 22 名患者中的 18 名患者中产生了可解释的定位,其中候选源与无癫痫发作的 13 名患者中的切除叶和持续发作的 5 名患者中的 3 名中的切除叶一致。与切除区相比,峭度波束形成器的亚叶准确性高于 ECD(分别为 56%和 50%),而 ECD 则导致叶准确性更高(分别为 75%和 67%)。
当在传感器上无法清晰识别棘波时,峭度波束形成可能会提供额外的价值,并在偶极子分散时支持 ECD 定位。
峭度波束形成应与现有的临床方案相结合,以协助定位致痫区。