Spagnuolo Gessyca, Faria Christina D C M, da Silva Bruna Adriana, Ovando Angélica Cristiane, Gomes-Osman Joyce, Swarowsky Alessandra
Physical Therapy Postgraduate Program, Department of Physical Therapy, Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Brazilian Parkinson's disease Rehabilitation Initiative (BPaRkI), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;42(4):465-472. doi: 10.3233/NRE-172379.
The Timed up and go test (TUG), the Five times sit-to-stand test (FTSTS) and the Bed Mobility test (BMT) are widely used in clinical practice for Parkinson Disease (PD). However, no reported studies have evaluated the responsiveness to group physical therapy intervention (GPTI).
To verify if TUG, FTSTS and BMT were responsive to GPTI.
Thirty individuals with PD were assessed prior to and after an 8-week evidence-based GPTI. Paired t test was used to determine statistically significant change pre-and post-intervention. Internal responsiveness (IR) was classified with the standardized response mean (SRM). A 5-point Likert scale assessed self-perceived performance by the subjects after the intervention. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the accuracy and cut-off scores for identifying participants who had shown improvement.
GPTI was efficient in improving real (p≤0.001) and self-perceived mobility performance in all measures. All tests were responsive to changes: the IR varied from medium to high (SRM = 0.7-1.5); the cut-off point for TUG test was >2.2 s, for FTSTS test was >2.5 s and for BM test >1.4 s.
The TUG, FTSTS and BMT were responsive to the GPTI and accurately detected meaningful clinical changes. Our results provide an important information about the clinical application of these tests in PD individuals.
计时起立行走测试(TUG)、五次坐立试验(FTSTS)和床上活动能力测试(BMT)在帕金森病(PD)的临床实践中被广泛应用。然而,尚无研究报道评估这些测试对团体物理治疗干预(GPTI)的反应性。
验证TUG、FTSTS和BMT对GPTI是否有反应。
30例帕金森病患者在进行为期8周的循证GPTI前后接受评估。采用配对t检验确定干预前后的统计学显著变化。用标准化反应均值(SRM)对内部反应性(IR)进行分类。干预后,采用5点李克特量表评估受试者的自我感知表现。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定识别有改善的参与者的准确性和临界分数。
GPTI在改善所有测量指标的实际(p≤0.001)和自我感知活动能力方面均有效。所有测试对变化均有反应:IR从中度到高度不等(SRM = 0.7 - 1.5);TUG测试的临界值>2.2秒,FTSTS测试的临界值>2.5秒,BM测试的临界值>1.4秒。
TUG、FTSTS和BMT对GPTI有反应,并能准确检测出有意义的临床变化。我们的结果为这些测试在帕金森病患者中的临床应用提供了重要信息。