• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作记忆与长时记忆的相互作用:列表长度和分心物对记忆表现的影响。

Where working memory meets long-term memory: The interplay of list length and distractors on memory performance.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Aug;45(8):1455-1472. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000652. Epub 2018 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000652
PMID:30070565
Abstract

Previous work regarding a counterintuitive benefit of increasing distractors on episodic long-term memory (LTM) has suggested that retrieval of memoranda in working memory (WM) after attention has been distracted may confer benefits to episodic LTM. The current study investigated 2 conceptions of how this may occur: either as an attentional refreshing of active memoranda within the focus of attention or as retrieval of a cohesive chunk of memoranda from outside the central component of WM. Given the literature suggesting that increasing the number of items to maintain in WM, or list length, incurs an attentional cost, the current study investigated whether increasing list length may reduce the beneficial impact of distractors on episodic LTM. In a series of three experiments, we manipulated list length and the number of distractors following the memoranda in a Brown-Peterson-like-span task. Despite profound negative effects of list length and distractors on initial recall, the results indicated that list length did not interact with the beneficial effect of distractors on final free recall of the items. Furthermore, final free recall was consistent across serial position, in line with the view that all of the memoranda are retrieved as a chunk after each distractor. These findings emphasize the notion that recovering inactive information from outside of the central component of WM may impact its long-term retention. The theoretical implications regarding how retrieval may be a means by which LTM processes influence WM are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

先前关于增加工作记忆 (WM) 中的分心物对情节性长时记忆 (LTM) 产生反直觉益处的研究表明,在注意力分散后从 WM 中检索记忆可能对情节性 LTM 有益。本研究探讨了两种可能的发生机制:一种是在注意力焦点内主动记忆的注意力刷新,另一种是从 WM 的中央组件之外检索到一个连贯的记忆块。鉴于文献表明,增加 WM 中需要维持的项目数量或列表长度会产生注意力成本,本研究探讨了增加列表长度是否会降低分心物对情节性 LTM 的有益影响。在一系列三个实验中,我们在类似于 Brown-Peterson 的记忆广度任务中操纵了列表长度和分心物的数量。尽管列表长度和分心物对初始回忆有深远的负面影响,但结果表明,列表长度与分心物对项目最终自由回忆的有益影响没有相互作用。此外,最终的自由回忆在序列位置上是一致的,这与所有记忆都在每个分心物之后作为一个块被检索的观点一致。这些发现强调了从 WM 的中央组件之外恢复非活动信息可能会影响其长期保留的观点。讨论了关于检索如何成为 LTM 过程影响 WM 的一种手段的理论意义。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Where working memory meets long-term memory: The interplay of list length and distractors on memory performance.工作记忆与长时记忆的相互作用:列表长度和分心物对记忆表现的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Aug;45(8):1455-1472. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000652. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
2
The role of semantic representations in verbal working memory.语义表征在言语工作记忆中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jun;44(6):863-881. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000475. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
3
What makes working memory traces stable over time?是什么使工作记忆痕迹随时间保持稳定?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jul;1424(1):149-160. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13668. Epub 2018 May 9.
4
Does semantic long-term memory impact refreshing in verbal working memory?语义长时记忆是否影响言语工作记忆的刷新?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Sep;45(9):1664-1682. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000657. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
5
Long-term semantic representations moderate the effect of attentional refreshing on episodic memory.长期语义表征调节注意力刷新对情景记忆的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):274-80. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0673-7.
6
Are latent working memory items retrieved from long-term memory?潜伏的工作记忆项目是否从长期记忆中检索出来?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Aug;77(8):1703-1726. doi: 10.1177/17470218231217723. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
7
Working memory recruits long-term memory when it is beneficial: Evidence from the Hebb effect.工作记忆在有益时会招募长期记忆:来自海布效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Apr;151(4):763-780. doi: 10.1037/xge0000934. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
8
Role of attention in the associative relatedness effect in verbal working memory: Behavioral and chronometric perspectives.注意在言语工作记忆联想相关效应中的作用:行为和时间的观点。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Nov;48(11):1571-1589. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001102. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
9
False memory at short and long term.短期和长期的虚假记忆。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Aug;148(8):1312-1334. doi: 10.1037/xge0000526. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
10
Intentional remembering and intentional forgetting in working and long-term memory.工作记忆和长期记忆中的有意回忆与有意遗忘。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Mar;151(3):513-541. doi: 10.1037/xge0001106. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
I remember it now, so I'll remember it later: Working memory strength guides predictions for long-term memory performance.我现在想起来了,以后也会记得:工作记忆强度指导对长期记忆表现的预测。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):1775-1797. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01514-3. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
2
Dependence of Working Memory on Coordinated Activity Across Brain Areas.工作记忆对脑区间协同活动的依赖性。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Jan 13;15:787316. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.787316. eCollection 2021.
3
The long-term consequences of retrieval demands during working memory.
工作记忆提取需求的长期后果。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jan;49(1):112-126. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01079-5.
4
Multiple-Time-Scale Analysis of Attention as Revealed by EEG, NIRS, and Pupil Diameter Signals During a Free Recall Task: A Multimodal Measurement Approach.自由回忆任务中脑电图、近红外光谱和瞳孔直径信号揭示的注意力多时间尺度分析:一种多模态测量方法
Front Neurosci. 2019 Dec 6;13:1307. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01307. eCollection 2019.
5
The effect of working memory maintenance on long-term memory.工作记忆维持对长期记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2019 May;47(4):749-763. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00908-6.