Xie Yuanliang, Wang Xiang, Xie Wei, Chen Faxiang, Gao Shubo, Xu Yikai
Department of Radiology, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430014, China.
Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510050, China.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2018 Jul;40(7):757-767. doi: 10.1007/s00276-018-2014-4. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
Myocardial bridges (MB) have traditionally been considered a benign condition, but recent studies have demonstrated that the clinical complications can be dangerous. The transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG) obtained from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) data (Retrospective ECG-triggered method) has been used in detecting significant stenosis in coronary artery caused by atherosclerosis. Contrast opacification difference (COD) was the parameters calculated as the change between attenuation of mural artery and the median attenuation of presumptive vessel segment; it was evaluated along with TAG (TAGs) and MB length for predicting MB with systolic compression (MB-SC) in patients diagnosed as MB in left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) by CCTA or invasive coronary angiograph (ICA).
A total of 107 MB patients were divided into three groups based on systolic compression (SC), including: Group 1 (MB without SC); Group 2 (MB with mild SC); and Group 3 (MB with significant SC). ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis analysis indicated TAGs showed the most significant differences for MB identification.
This study revealed that TAGs decreasing and COD increasing were dominated in MB with significant SC.
COD had a higher sensitivity and a higher negative predictive value for detecting MB with significant SC than TAGs.
心肌桥(MB)传统上被认为是一种良性病变,但最近的研究表明其临床并发症可能很危险。从冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)数据(回顾性心电图触发法)获得的跨腔衰减梯度(TAG)已被用于检测动脉粥样硬化引起的冠状动脉严重狭窄。对比剂充盈差异(COD)是作为壁内动脉衰减与假定血管段的中位数衰减之间的变化计算的参数;它与TAG(TAGs)和MB长度一起进行评估,以预测通过CCTA或有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)诊断为左前降支冠状动脉(LAD)心肌桥的患者中具有收缩期压迫的心肌桥(MB-SC)。
根据收缩期压迫(SC)将107例心肌桥患者分为三组,包括:第1组(无收缩期压迫的心肌桥);第2组(轻度收缩期压迫的心肌桥);和第3组(显著收缩期压迫的心肌桥)。方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis分析表明,TAGs在心肌桥识别方面显示出最显著的差异。
本研究表明,在显著收缩期压迫的心肌桥中,TAGs降低和COD增加占主导。
对于检测具有显著收缩期压迫的心肌桥,COD比TAGs具有更高的敏感性和更高的阴性预测值。