Williams Christopher R, Cook Anne E, O'Brien Edward J
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire.
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Sep;44(9):1414-1429. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000526. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
The RI-Val model of comprehension includes a validation process in which linkages formed by integration are matched against active memory. In five experiments, we investigated factors that influence validation. Reading times were measured on target sentences that contained either correct information or semantically related, but incorrect content. Experiment 1 demonstrated that strong contextual support for shared features between correct and incorrect terms delayed processing difficulty associated with incorrect information. Experiment 2 confirmed that contextual information needed to be available in memory in order to influence validation. Experiments 3a and 3b showed that strong contextual support for distinguishing features between correct and incorrect terms led to immediate processing difficulty associated with incorrect information, whereas features-in-common led to delayed difficulty. Experiments 4 and 5 showed that the timing of validation effects is sensitive to subtle changes in task demands. The combined results are consistent with the assumptions of the RI-Val model. (PsycINFO Database Record
理解的RI-Val模型包括一个验证过程,在这个过程中,由整合形成的联系会与活跃记忆进行匹配。在五个实验中,我们研究了影响验证的因素。对包含正确信息或语义相关但错误内容的目标句子的阅读时间进行了测量。实验1表明,对正确和错误术语之间共享特征的强烈语境支持延迟了与错误信息相关的处理难度。实验2证实,语境信息需要在记忆中可用才能影响验证。实验3a和3b表明,对正确和错误术语之间区分特征的强烈语境支持会导致与错误信息相关的即时处理难度,而共同特征则会导致延迟的难度。实验4和5表明,验证效果的时机对任务需求的细微变化很敏感。综合结果与RI-Val模型的假设一致。(PsycINFO数据库记录)