• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

追踪和维护叙述中的与目标相关的位置信息。

Tracking and maintenance of goal-relevant location information in narratives.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, 216 Memorial Hall, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2019 Jul;47(5):983-996. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00915-7.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-019-00915-7
PMID:30859405
Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to examine whether readers maintain location in a highly-accessible state in memory during narrative comprehension while reading narratives with goals closely tied to locations that story protagonists needed to reach. College undergraduates (n = 185, n = 100) read short, experiment-generated narratives manipulated in three ways. First, protagonist location was manipulated such that the goal was either completed or not, making subsequent critical sentences consistent or inconsistent, respectively, with the last-described location. Second, text distance between the manipulation of location and the later target sentence was varied such that the critical sentences were close to or distant from the last mention of location. Third, location words that explicitly mentioned the protagonist's location were either present or not in the critical sentences. Readers took longer to read critical sentences when the protagonist had not been described as reaching the goal location, suggesting that readers were maintaining location information in highly-accessible state. This effect emerged with or without explicit location words in the critical sentences and with near or distant backgrounding. These results are discussed in the context of scenario-based and memory-based theories of comprehension.

摘要

两项实验旨在考察在阅读与目标位置密切相关的叙事时,读者在理解叙述过程中是否会将位置信息保持在高度可及的状态。研究招募了 185 名大学生(实验组 100 名)阅读经过三种方式操控的短篇、生成叙事。首先,操控主角的位置,使目标要么完成,要么未完成,使后续关键句分别与最后描述的位置一致或不一致。其次,操控位置和后续目标句之间的文本距离不同,使关键句与位置的最后一次提及距离较近或较远。最后,关键句中是否出现明确提到主角位置的位置词。当主角没有被描述为到达目标位置时,读者阅读关键句的时间会延长,这表明读者在将位置信息保持在高度可及的状态。无论关键句中是否出现明确的位置词,以及背景距离远近,这种效应都会出现。这些结果在基于场景和基于记忆的理解理论背景下进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Tracking and maintenance of goal-relevant location information in narratives.追踪和维护叙述中的与目标相关的位置信息。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jul;47(5):983-996. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00915-7.
2
The role of reader age and focus of attention in creating situation models from narratives.读者年龄和注意力焦点在从叙事中构建情境模型方面的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997 Mar;52(2):P73-80. doi: 10.1093/geronb/52b.2.p73.
3
Tracking of spatial information in narratives.叙事中空间信息的追踪。
Mem Cognit. 2001 Mar;29(2):327-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03194927.
4
The protagonist's first perspective influences the encoding of spatial information in narratives.主人公的初始视角会影响叙事中空间信息的编码。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(3):506-20. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1056194. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
5
Readers of narratives take the protagonist's geographical perspective. Evidence from an event-related potential study.叙事作品的读者会采取主人公的地理视角。来自一项事件相关电位研究的证据。
Brain Lang. 2016 Feb;153-154:20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
6
Backward updating of mental models during continuous reading of narratives.在持续阅读叙事文本过程中对心理模型的反向更新
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Mar;21(2):373-85. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.2.373.
7
Temporal and spatial distance in situation models.情境模型中的时间与空间距离。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Dec;28(8):1310-20. doi: 10.3758/bf03211832.
8
Spatial Inferences in Narrative Comprehension: the Role of Verbal and Spatial Working Memory.叙事理解中的空间推理:言语和空间工作记忆的作用。
Span J Psychol. 2016 Mar 14;19:E11. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.11.
9
Access to prior spatial information.获取先前的空间信息。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Oct;48(7):1234-1248. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00996-4.
10
The role of perspective in the accessibility of goals during reading.阅读过程中视角在目标可达性方面的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Mar;21(2):364-72. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.2.364.

本文引用的文献

1
Validating semantic illusions: Competition between context and general world knowledge.验证语义错觉:语境与一般世界知识之间的竞争。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Sep;44(9):1414-1429. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000526. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
2
Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R.在R语言中评估线性混合效应模型的显著性。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1494-1502. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y.
3
Event boundaries and anaphoric reference.事件边界与指代照应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Jun;23(3):849-56. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0961-x.
4
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
5
Effects of changes in narrative time on eye movements and recognition responses.叙事时间变化对眼动和识别反应的影响。
J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2013 May 1;25(3):283-298. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.768232.
6
Tracking spatial information during reading: a cue-based process.阅读过程中空间信息的追踪:基于线索的过程。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):791-801. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0190-8.
7
Starting from scratch and building brick by brick in comprehension.从零开始,逐步提高理解能力。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):812-26. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0179-8.
8
The impact of continuity editing in narrative film on event segmentation.叙事电影中连续性剪辑对事件分割的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;35(8):1489-517. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01202.x. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
9
Readers' reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension.读者对来源可信度的依赖对理解有帮助。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jan;37(1):230-47. doi: 10.1037/a0021331.
10
Reading times and the detection of event shift processing.阅读时间与事件移位加工的检测。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):210-6. doi: 10.1037/a0017258.