Suppr超能文献

被遗忘却未消逝:长期记忆中对图片和文字的存储

Forgotten but not gone: savings for pictures and words in long-term memory.

作者信息

MacLeod C M

机构信息

Division of Life Sciences, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Apr;14(2):195-212. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.2.195.

Abstract

Five experiments examined the relearning of words, simple line-drawing pictures, and complex photographic pictures after retention intervals of 1 to 10 weeks. For those items that were neither recalled nor recognized, the identical item was relearned better than an unrelated control item, as measured by a recall test following relearning. This relearning advantage in recall held for all three classes of material and extended to the cross-modality case (i.e., picture-word and word-picture) and the same-referent case (i.e., two pictures of the same object). However, recognition tests of relearning failed to detect this same relearning advantage for apparently forgotten items. Taken together, these findings conflict with the existing account of savings. Most fundamental, the classic argument that relearning serves a trace-strengthening function is undetermined by the observed recall-recognition contrast. An alternative explanation of savings is suggested wherein relearning assists retrieval of information, thereby affecting recall in particular.

摘要

五项实验研究了在1至10周的保留间隔后,单词、简单线条画图片和复杂照片图片的再学习情况。对于那些既未被回忆起也未被识别出的项目,通过再学习后的回忆测试来衡量,相同的项目比无关的对照项目再学习效果更好。这种回忆中的再学习优势适用于所有三类材料,并扩展到跨模态情况(即图片 - 单词和单词 - 图片)以及相同指称情况(即同一物体的两张图片)。然而,对再学习的识别测试未能检测到明显遗忘项目的相同再学习优势。综合来看,这些发现与现有的节省量解释相冲突。最根本的是,再学习起到痕迹强化作用的经典论点并未由观察到的回忆 - 识别对比所确定。提出了一种节省量的替代解释,即再学习有助于信息检索,从而特别影响回忆。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验