• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检索线索的属性限制了图片优势效应。

The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.

作者信息

Weldon M S, Roediger H L, Challis B H

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1989 Jan;17(1):95-105. doi: 10.3758/bf03199561.

DOI:10.3758/bf03199561
PMID:2913461
Abstract

In three experiments, we examined why pictures are remembered better than words on explicit memory tests like recall and recognition, whereas words produce more priming than pictures on some implicit tests, such as word-fragment and word-stem completion (e.g., completing -l-ph-nt or ele----- as elephant). One possibility is that pictures are always more accessible than words if subjects are given explicit retrieval instructions. An alternative possibility is that the properties of the retrieval cues themselves constrain the retrieval processes engaged; word fragments might induce data-driven (perceptually based) retrieval, which favors words regardless of the retrieval instructions. Experiment 1 demonstrated that words were remembered better than pictures on both the word-fragment and word-stem completion tasks under both implicit and explicit retrieval conditions. In Experiment 2, pictures were recalled better than words with semantically related extralist cues. In Experiment 3, when semantic cues were combined with word fragments, pictures and words were recalled equally well under explicit retrieval conditions, but words were superior to pictures under implicit instructions. Thus, the inherently data-limited properties of fragmented words limit their use in accessing conceptual codes. Overall, the results indicate that retrieval operations are largely determined by properties of the retrieval cues under both implicit and explicit retrieval conditions.

摘要

在三项实验中,我们探究了为何在诸如回忆和识别这类显性记忆测试中,图片比文字记忆得更好,而在一些隐性测试(如单词片段补全和词干补全,例如将-l-ph-nt或ele-----补全为elephant)中,文字比图片产生的启动效应更强。一种可能性是,如果给被试明确的提取指令,图片总是比文字更容易获取。另一种可能性是,提取线索本身的特性会限制所采用的提取过程;单词片段可能会引发基于数据驱动(基于感知)的提取,这种提取方式更有利于文字,而与提取指令无关。实验1表明,在隐性和显性提取条件下,在单词片段补全和词干补全任务中,文字比图片记忆得更好。在实验2中,使用语义相关的额外列表线索时,图片比文字回忆得更好。在实验3中,当语义线索与单词片段相结合时,在显性提取条件下,图片和文字的回忆效果一样好,但在隐性指令下,文字优于图片。因此,碎片化单词固有的数据局限性限制了它们在获取概念代码中的应用。总体而言,结果表明,在隐性和显性提取条件下,提取操作很大程度上由提取线索的特性决定。

相似文献

1
The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.检索线索的属性限制了图片优势效应。
Mem Cognit. 1989 Jan;17(1):95-105. doi: 10.3758/bf03199561.
2
Picture superiority in conceptual memory: dissociative effects of encoding and retrieval tasks.概念记忆中的图片优势:编码和检索任务的分离效应
Mem Cognit. 2000 Oct;28(7):1165-72. doi: 10.3758/bf03211817.
3
Associative priming in word fragment completion: a dissociation between explicit and implicit retrieval processes.单词片段补全中的联想启动:显性与隐性检索过程的分离
Memory. 1997 Nov;5(6):673-702. doi: 10.1080/741941547.
4
Perceptual and conceptual cueing in implicit and explicit retrieval.内隐和外显检索中的知觉与概念线索提示
Memory. 1993 Jun;1(2):127-51. doi: 10.1080/09658219308258228.
5
Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: word fragment and word stem completion.两种内隐记忆测试的直接比较:单词片段和词干补全。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Nov;18(6):1251-69. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.6.1251.
6
Why do pictures produce priming on the word-fragment completion test? A study of encoding and retrieval factors.为什么图片在单词片段完成测试中会产生启动效应?一项关于编码和检索因素的研究。
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jul;21(4):519-28. doi: 10.3758/bf03197183.
7
Priming and false memories from Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists on a fragment completion test with children.基于儿童片段完成测试的Deese-Roediger-McDermott列表引发的启动效应和错误记忆
Am J Psychol. 2005 Spring;118(1):13-28.
8
Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.追踪图片-文字处理的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Dec;109(4):373-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.373.
9
Mental representations for pictures and words: same or different?图片和文字的心理表征:相同还是不同?
Am J Psychol. 1984 Spring;97(1):1-15.
10
Effects of Saccade Induced Retrieval Enhancement on conceptual and perceptual tests of explicit & implicit memory.扫视诱发的记忆提取增强对显性和隐性记忆的概念性及感知性测试的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2018 Mar;121:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of the Visual Versus Verbal Modality in Learning Novel Verbs.视觉与言语模态在学习新动词中的作用。
Children (Basel). 2025 May 31;12(6):722. doi: 10.3390/children12060722.
2
Active View and Passive View in Virtual Reality Have Different Impacts on Memory and Impression.虚拟现实中的主动视图和被动视图对记忆和印象有不同影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 1;10:2416. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02416. eCollection 2019.
3
Increasing word distinctiveness eliminates the picture superiority effect in recognition: Evidence for the physical-distinctiveness account.

本文引用的文献

1
A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.一套标准化的260张图片:名称一致性、图像一致性、熟悉度和视觉复杂度的规范。
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174-215. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174.
2
The effects of priming on picture recognition.启动对图片识别的影响。
Br J Psychol. 1982 Feb;73(Pt 1):117-29. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01796.x.
3
On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.关于自传体记忆与知觉学习之间的关系。
增加单词独特性可消除识别中的图片优势效应:来自物理独特性解释的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):182-193. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0858-9.
4
Sentence Context and Word-Picture Cued-Recall Paired-Associate Learning Procedure Boosts Recall in Normal and Mild Alzheimer's Disease Patients.句子情境与文字图片线索回忆配对联想学习程序可提高正常及轻度阿尔茨海默病患者的回忆能力。
Behav Neurol. 2018 Apr 17;2018:7401465. doi: 10.1155/2018/7401465. eCollection 2018.
5
Feigning Amnesia Moderately Impairs Memory for a Mock Crime Video.假装失忆会适度损害对模拟犯罪视频的记忆。
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 30;9:625. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00625. eCollection 2018.
6
Staying Connected on the Road: A Comparison of Different Types of Smart Phone Use in a Driving Simulator.在路上保持联系:驾驶模拟器中不同类型智能手机使用情况的比较。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0148555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148555. eCollection 2016.
7
Preserved conceptual implicit memory for pictures in patients with Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病患者对图片的概念性内隐记忆得以保留。
Brain Cogn. 2015 Oct;99:112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.07.008.
8
Using pictures and words to understand recognition memory deterioration in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a review.运用图片和文字理解遗忘型轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病的识别记忆衰退:综述。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012 Dec;12(6):687-94. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0310-7.
9
Gist-based conceptual processing of pictures remains intact in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者的基于要点的图片概念处理保持完整。
Neuropsychology. 2012 Mar;26(2):202-8. doi: 10.1037/a0026958. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
10
An auditory analog of the picture superiority effect.图片优势效应的听觉类比。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Jan;39(1):63-74. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0015-6.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1981 Sep;110(3):306-40. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.110.3.306.
4
Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.追踪图片-文字处理的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Dec;109(4):373-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.373.
5
Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect.改变检索要求会逆转图片优势效应。
Mem Cognit. 1987 Jul;15(4):269-80. doi: 10.3758/bf03197030.
6
Strength and duration of priming effects in normal subjects and amnesic patients.正常受试者和失忆症患者启动效应的强度与持续时间。
Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(1B):195-210. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90131-x.
7
Levels of processing and picture memory: the physical superiority effect.加工水平与图片记忆:物理优势效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1985 Apr;11(2):284-98. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.11.2.284.
8
Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.比较单词片段补全和字母线索提示下的线索回忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1987 Oct;13(4):542-52. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.13.4.542.
9
Time to understand pictures and words.理解图片和文字的时间。
Nature. 1975 Feb 6;253(5491):437-8. doi: 10.1038/253437a0.