• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检索诱导遗忘后的加速再学习:被遗忘的益处。

Accelerated relearning after retrieval-induced forgetting: the benefit of being forgotten.

作者信息

Storm Benjamin C, Bjork Elizabeth Ligon, Bjork Robert A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):230-6. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.230.

DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.230
PMID:18194065
Abstract

Research on retrieval-induced forgetting has demonstrated that retrieving some information from memory can cause the forgetting of other information in memory. Here, the authors report research on the relearning of items that have been subjected to retrieval-induced forgetting. Participants studied a list of category- exemplar pairs, underwent a series of retrieval-practice and relearning trials, and, finally, were tested on the initially studied pairs. The final recall of non-relearned items exhibited a cumulative effect of retrieval-induced forgetting such that the size of the effect increased with each block of retrieval practice. Of most interest, and very surprising from a common-sense standpoint, items that were relearned benefited more from that relearning if they had previously been forgotten. The results offer insights into the nature and durability of retrieval-induced forgetting and provide additional evidence that forgetting is an enabler--rather than a disabler--of future learning.

摘要

对提取诱发遗忘的研究表明,从记忆中提取某些信息会导致记忆中其他信息的遗忘。在此,作者报告了关于对遭受提取诱发遗忘的项目进行再学习的研究。参与者学习了一系列类别-示例对,经历了一系列提取练习和再学习试验,最后对最初学习的对进行测试。未再学习项目的最终回忆表现出提取诱发遗忘的累积效应,即该效应的大小随着每个提取练习块而增加。最有趣的是,从常识角度来看非常令人惊讶的是,如果之前被遗忘的项目被再学习,那么这些项目从再学习中受益更多。这些结果为提取诱发遗忘的本质和持久性提供了见解,并提供了额外的证据表明遗忘是未来学习的促进因素而非阻碍因素。

相似文献

1
Accelerated relearning after retrieval-induced forgetting: the benefit of being forgotten.检索诱导遗忘后的加速再学习:被遗忘的益处。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):230-6. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.230.
2
No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.使用特定项目独立线索时不存在提取诱发遗忘:反对一般性抑制观点的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):950-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.950.
3
Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: evidence for a reduction in general memory strength.项目识别中的提取诱发遗忘:一般记忆强度降低的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):863-75. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.863.
4
The role of item strength in retrieval-induced forgetting.项目强度在提取诱发遗忘中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):607-17. doi: 10.1037/a0015264.
5
Assessing the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting with implicit-memory tests.使用内隐记忆测试评估提取诱发遗忘的抑制理论。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1111-9.
6
Limits of the retrieval-inhibition construct: list segregation in directed forgetting.提取抑制概念的局限性:指向性遗忘中的列表分离
J Gen Psychol. 2003 Oct;130(4):359-79. doi: 10.1080/00221300309601164.
7
ADHD and retrieval-induced forgetting: evidence for a deficit in the inhibitory control of memory.注意缺陷多动障碍与提取诱发遗忘:记忆抑制控制缺陷的证据。
Memory. 2010 Apr;18(3):265-71. doi: 10.1080/09658210903547884. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
8
Remembering can cause inhibition: retrieval-induced inhibition as cue independent process.记忆会引发抑制:提取诱发抑制作为一种线索独立过程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):315-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.315.
9
Successful inhibition, unsuccessful retrieval: manipulating time and success during retrieval practice.成功抑制,失败检索:在检索练习中操纵时间和成功。
Memory. 2010 Feb;18(2):99-114. doi: 10.1080/09658210903107853.
10
Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.有意遗忘能减少错误记忆吗?列表层面和项目层面遗忘的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jan;127(1):146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.03.004. Epub 2007 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Retuning conceptual-lexical access: does interference promote more robust learning?重新调整概念-词汇通达:干扰是否能促进更稳固的学习?
Psychol Res. 2025 Aug 30;89(5):137. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02169-2.
2
Does Memory Accessibility Affect How Much We Learn from Studying?记忆的可及性会影响我们通过学习学到多少东西吗?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 1;15(6):760. doi: 10.3390/bs15060760.
3
Distortion of overlapping memories relates to arousal and anxiety.重叠记忆的扭曲与唤醒和焦虑有关。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Feb;25(1):154-172. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01229-1. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
4
Durability of retrieval-induced forgetting: Effects of different practice schedules.提取诱发遗忘的持续性:不同练习计划的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Sep 10. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01634-4.
5
Theory-driven treatment modifications: A discussion on meeting the linguistic, cognitive, and psychosocial needs of individual clients with aphasia.理论驱动的治疗调整:讨论如何满足个体失语症患者的语言、认知和心理社会需求。
J Commun Disord. 2023 May-Jun;103:106327. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106327. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
6
Effortful Retrieval Practice Effects in Lexical Access: A Role for Semantic Competition.词汇提取中努力检索练习的效果:语义竞争的作用。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022;37(8):948-963. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2022.2027991. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
7
Examining the effect size and duration of retrieval-induced facilitation.考察提取诱发促进的效应量和持续时间。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1166-1179. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01729-0. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
8
Relearning can eliminate the effect of retrieval-induced forgetting.重新学习可以消除提取诱发遗忘的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1725-1736. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01601-7. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
9
Adaptive Repulsion of Long-Term Memory Representations Is Triggered by Event Similarity.长期记忆表征的自适应排斥是由事件相似性触发的。
Psychol Sci. 2021 May;32(5):705-720. doi: 10.1177/0956797620972490. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
10
An Evidence-Based Guide for Medical Students: How to Optimize the Use of Expanded-Retrieval Platforms.医学生循证指南:如何优化扩展检索平台的使用
Cureus. 2020 Sep 11;12(9):e10372. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10372.