Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, United States.
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, United States.
Resuscitation. 2018 Jun;127:105-113. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
This study sought to examine the trends and predictors of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use in patients hospitalized after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
There is a paucity of data regarding MCS use in patients hospitalized after OHCA.
We conducted an observational analysis of MCS use in 960,428 patients hospitalized after OHCA between January 2008 and December 2014 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. On multivariable analysis, we also assessed factors associated with MCS use and survival to discharge.
Among the 960,428 patients, 51,863 (5.4%) had MCS utilized. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was the most commonly used MCS after OHCA with frequency of 47,061 (4.9%), followed by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 3650 (0.4%), and percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVAD) 3265 (0.3%). From 2008 to 2014, there was an increase in the utilization of MCS from 5% in 2008 to 5.7% in 2014 (P < 0.001). There was a non-significant decline in the use of IABP from 4.9% to 4.7% (P = 0.95), whereas PVAD use increased from 0.04% to 0.7% (P < 0.001), and ECMO use increased from 0.1% to 0.7% (P < 0.001) during the study period. Younger, male patients with myocardial infarction, higher co-morbid conditions, VT/VF as initial rhythm, and presentation to a large urban hospital were more likely to receive percutaneous MCS implantation. Survival to discharge was significantly higher in patients who were selected to receive MCS (56.9% vs. 43.1%, OR: 1.16, 95% CI: (1.11-1.21), p < 0.001).
There is a steady increase in the use of MCS in OHCA, especially PVAD and ECMO, despite lack of randomized clinical trial data supporting an improvement in outcomes. More definitive randomized studies are needed to assess accurately the optimal role of MCS in this patient population.
本研究旨在探讨院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后住院患者使用机械循环支持(MCS)的趋势和预测因素。
关于 OHCA 后住院患者使用 MCS 的数据很少。
我们对 2008 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间全国住院患者样本数据库中 960428 例 OHCA 后住院患者的 MCS 使用情况进行了观察性分析。在多变量分析中,我们还评估了与 MCS 使用和出院存活率相关的因素。
在 960428 例患者中,51863 例(5.4%)使用了 MCS。主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)是 OHCA 后最常用的 MCS,使用频率为 47061 例(4.9%),其次是体外膜氧合(ECMO)3650 例(0.4%)和经皮心室辅助装置(PVAD)3265 例(0.3%)。2008 年至 2014 年,MCS 的使用率从 2008 年的 5%增加到 2014 年的 5.7%(P<0.001)。IABP 的使用率从 4.9%降至 4.7%(P=0.95),但 PVAD 的使用率从 0.04%升至 0.7%(P<0.001),ECMO 的使用率从 0.1%升至 0.7%(P<0.001)。年轻、男性患者,心肌梗死、合并症较多、初始节律为 VT/VF 以及在大型城市医院就诊的患者更有可能接受经皮 MCS 植入。选择接受 MCS 的患者出院存活率显著提高(56.9%比 43.1%,OR:1.16,95%CI:(1.11-1.21),p<0.001)。
尽管缺乏支持改善结果的随机临床试验数据,但 OHCA 中 MCS 的使用呈稳步增加趋势,尤其是 PVAD 和 ECMO。需要更明确的随机研究来准确评估 MCS 在这一患者群体中的最佳作用。