• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

储存缓冲液、DNA 提取方法和聚合酶对微生物分析的影响。

The impact of storage buffer, DNA extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis.

机构信息

Work Group Neglected Tropical Diseases, Infection Biology Unit, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Kellnerweg 4, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.

Primate Genetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Kellnerweg 4, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 19;8(1):6292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24573-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-24573-y
PMID:29674641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5908915/
Abstract

Next-generation sequencing approaches used to characterize microbial communities are subject to technical caveats that can lead to major distortion of acquired data. Determining the optimal sample handling protocol is essential to minimize the bias for different sample types. Using a mock community composed of 22 bacterial strains of even concentration, we studied a combination of handling conditions to determine the optimal conditions for swab material. Examining a combination of effects simulates the reality of handling environmental samples and may thus provide a better foundation for the standardization of protocols. We found that the choice of storage buffer and extraction kit affects the detected bacterial composition, while different 16S rRNA amplification methods only had a minor effect. All bacterial genera present in the mock community were identified with minimal levels of contamination independent of the choice of sample processing. Despite this, the observed bacterial profile for all tested conditions were significantly different from the expected abundance. This highlights the need for proper validation and standardization for each sample type using a mock community and blank control samples, to assess the bias in the protocol and reduce variation across the datasets.

摘要

用于描述微生物群落的下一代测序方法受到技术限制的影响,这些限制可能会导致获得的数据发生重大扭曲。确定最佳的样本处理方案对于最大限度地减少不同样本类型的偏差至关重要。我们使用由 22 种浓度均匀的细菌菌株组成的模拟群落来研究组合处理条件,以确定拭子材料的最佳条件。研究组合效应可以模拟处理环境样本的实际情况,从而为标准化方案提供更好的基础。我们发现,储存缓冲液和提取试剂盒的选择会影响检测到的细菌组成,而不同的 16S rRNA 扩增方法只有微小的影响。使用模拟群落和空白对照样品对每种样本类型进行适当的验证和标准化,以评估方案中的偏差并减少数据集之间的差异,从而可以独立于样本处理选择识别模拟群落中存在的所有细菌属,且污染水平最小。尽管如此,所有测试条件下观察到的细菌图谱与预期的丰度有显著差异。这凸显了使用模拟群落和空白对照样品对每种样本类型进行适当验证和标准化的必要性,以评估方案中的偏差并减少数据集之间的差异。

相似文献

1
The impact of storage buffer, DNA extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis.储存缓冲液、DNA 提取方法和聚合酶对微生物分析的影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 19;8(1):6292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24573-y.
2
The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.宏基因组学的真相:量化和抵消16S rRNA研究中的偏差
BMC Microbiol. 2015 Mar 21;15:66. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0351-6.
3
Optimizing 16S rRNA gene profile analysis from low biomass nasopharyngeal and induced sputum specimens.优化鼻咽和诱导痰低生物量标本 16S rRNA 基因谱分析。
BMC Microbiol. 2020 May 12;20(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01795-7.
4
16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform.模拟微生物群落的16S rRNA基因测序——DNA提取方法、引物选择和测序平台的影响
BMC Microbiol. 2016 Jun 24;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z.
5
Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.一种方便参与者的粪便收集方法用于微生物组分析的可靠性:迈向大样本量研究的一步。
BMC Microbiol. 2018 Sep 6;18(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1249-x.
6
Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.人类粪便样本的储存与处理会影响肠道微生物群组成:一项可行性研究。
J Microbiol Methods. 2019 Sep;164:105668. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.105668. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Cell-Free Microbial DNA Analysis: Effects of Blood Plasma and Serum Quantity, Biobanking Protocols, and Isolation Kits.无细胞微生物 DNA 分析:血浆和血清量、生物样本库方案和分离试剂盒的影响。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2024 Aug;22(4):363-372. doi: 10.1089/bio.2023.0048. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
8
Microbial profiling of cpn60 universal target sequences in artificial mixtures of vaginal bacteria sampled by nylon swabs or self-sampling devices under different storage conditions.在不同储存条件下,通过尼龙拭子或自我采样装置采集的阴道细菌人工混合物中cpn60通用靶序列的微生物谱分析。
J Microbiol Methods. 2017 May;136:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
9
Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.细菌皮肤微生物群调查方法的优化:引物选择以及454平台与MiSeq平台的比较
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0927-4.
10
Method Validation for Extraction of DNA from Human Stool Samples for Downstream Microbiome Analysis.用于下游微生物组分析的人粪便样本DNA提取方法验证
Biopreserv Biobank. 2020 Apr;18(2):102-116. doi: 10.1089/bio.2019.0112. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Metagenomic Insights Into Biopile Remediation of Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Using Chicken Droppings in Rivers State, Nigeria.尼日利亚河流州利用鸡粪对石油污染土壤进行生物堆修复的宏基因组学见解。
Bioinform Biol Insights. 2025 Sep 12;19:11779322251371117. doi: 10.1177/11779322251371117. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of parental care on skin microbial community composition in poison frogs.亲代抚育对箭毒蛙皮肤微生物群落组成的影响。
Elife. 2025 Jul 31;14:RP103331. doi: 10.7554/eLife.103331.
3
Multi-Tool Marine Metabarcoding Bioassessment for Baselining and Monitoring Species and Communities in Kelp Habitats.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative analysis of vaginal microbiota sampling using 16S rRNA gene analysis.使用16S rRNA基因分析对阴道微生物群样本进行比较分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 19;12(7):e0181477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181477. eCollection 2017.
2
Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics.归一化和微生物差异丰度策略取决于数据特征。
Microbiome. 2017 Mar 3;5(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0237-y.
3
Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities.
用于海带栖息地物种和群落基线评估与监测的多工具海洋宏条形码生物评估
Mol Ecol Resour. 2025 Oct;25(7):e70010. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.70010. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
4
Do we need a standardized 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis protocol for poultry microbiota research?家禽微生物群研究是否需要标准化的16S rRNA基因扩增子测序分析方案?
Poult Sci. 2025 Jul;104(7):105242. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105242. Epub 2025 May 1.
5
Towards a comprehensive view of wetland benthic communities.迈向对湿地底栖生物群落的全面认识。
Curr Res Microb Sci. 2025 Apr 14;8:100391. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100391. eCollection 2025.
6
De-biasing microbiome sequencing data: bacterial morphology-based correction of extraction bias and correlates of chimera formation.微生物组测序数据的去偏倚:基于细菌形态学对提取偏差的校正及嵌合体形成的相关因素
Microbiome. 2025 Feb 4;13(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40168-024-01998-4.
7
Effects of parental care on skin microbial community composition in poison frogs.亲代抚育对箭毒蛙皮肤微生物群落组成的影响。
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 13:2024.09.11.612488. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.11.612488.
8
Microbiome Dynamics and Functional Composition in Coelopa frigida (Diptera, Coelopidae): Insights into Trophic Specialization of Kelp Flies.冷温性飞蝇(双翅目,管蝇科)的微生物组动态和功能组成:对巨藻蝇类取食特化的深入了解。
Microb Ecol. 2024 Jul 3;87(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s00248-024-02403-1.
9
Intervertebral disc microbiome in Modic changes: Lack of result replication underscores the need for a consensus in low-biomass microbiome analysis.莫迪克改变中的椎间盘微生物群:缺乏结果重复性凸显了低生物量微生物群分析中达成共识的必要性。
JOR Spine. 2024 Apr 4;7(2):e1330. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1330. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Critical evaluation of faecal microbiome preservation using metagenomic analysis.使用宏基因组分析对粪便微生物群保存进行批判性评估。
ISME Commun. 2021 May 5;1(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s43705-021-00014-2.
评估DNA提取方法对人类口腔细菌和真菌群落代表性的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0169877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169877. eCollection 2017.
4
Evaluation of Lysis Methods for the Extraction of Bacterial DNA for Analysis of the Vaginal Microbiota.用于提取细菌DNA以分析阴道微生物群的裂解方法评估
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 19;11(9):e0163148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163148. eCollection 2016.
5
An assessment of US microbiome research.美国微生物组研究评估。
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Jan 11;1:15015. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2015.15.
6
Revised Estimates for the Number of Human and Bacteria Cells in the Body.人体和细菌细胞数量的修订估计值。
PLoS Biol. 2016 Aug 19;14(8):e1002533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002533. eCollection 2016 Aug.
7
Characterization of the Gut Microbiome Using 16S or Shotgun Metagenomics.使用16S或鸟枪法宏基因组学对肠道微生物组进行表征。
Front Microbiol. 2016 Apr 20;7:459. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00459. eCollection 2016.
8
Body Site Is a More Determinant Factor than Human Population Diversity in the Healthy Skin Microbiome.在健康皮肤微生物群中,身体部位比人类群体多样性更是一个决定性因素。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 18;11(4):e0151990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151990. eCollection 2016.
9
Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.样本储存条件显著影响粪便微生物群谱。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 17;5:16350. doi: 10.1038/srep16350.
10
The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.宏基因组学的真相:量化和抵消16S rRNA研究中的偏差
BMC Microbiol. 2015 Mar 21;15:66. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0351-6.