• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究设计:跨学科研究框架的方法学

Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework.

作者信息

Tobi Hilde, Kampen Jarl K

机构信息

1Biometris, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.

2Statua, Dept. of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Antwerp University, Venusstraat 35, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Qual Quant. 2018;52(3):1209-1225. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8
PMID:29674791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5897493/
Abstract

Many of today's global scientific challenges require the joint involvement of researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds (social sciences, environmental sciences, climatology, medicine, etc.). Such interdisciplinary research teams face many challenges resulting from differences in training and scientific culture. Interdisciplinary education programs are required to train truly interdisciplinary scientists with respect to the critical factor skills and competences. For that purpose this paper presents the Methodology for Interdisciplinary Research (MIR) framework. The MIR framework was developed to help cross disciplinary borders, especially those between the natural sciences and the social sciences. The framework has been specifically constructed to facilitate the design of interdisciplinary scientific research, and can be applied in an educational program, as a reference for monitoring the phases of interdisciplinary research, and as a tool to design such research in a process approach. It is suitable for research projects of different sizes and levels of complexity, and it allows for a range of methods' combinations (case study, mixed methods, etc.). The different phases of designing interdisciplinary research in the MIR framework are described and illustrated by real-life applications in teaching and research. We further discuss the framework's utility in research design in landscape architecture, mixed methods research, and provide an outlook to the framework's potential in inclusive interdisciplinary research, and last but not least, research integrity.

摘要

当今许多全球性科学挑战需要来自不同学科背景(社会科学、环境科学、气候学、医学等)的研究人员共同参与。这类跨学科研究团队面临着诸多因培训和科学文化差异而产生的挑战。需要跨学科教育项目来培养具备关键因素技能和能力的真正跨学科科学家。为此,本文提出了跨学科研究方法(MIR)框架。MIR框架的开发旨在帮助跨越学科界限,尤其是自然科学与社会科学之间的界限。该框架经过专门构建,以促进跨学科科学研究的设计,可应用于教育项目,作为监测跨学科研究各阶段的参考,并作为以流程方式设计此类研究的工具。它适用于不同规模和复杂程度的研究项目,并且允许采用多种方法组合(案例研究、混合方法等)。MIR框架中跨学科研究设计的不同阶段通过教学和研究中的实际应用进行了描述和说明。我们进一步讨论了该框架在景观设计研究、混合方法研究设计中的效用,并展望了该框架在包容性跨学科研究以及最后但同样重要的研究诚信方面的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105c/5897493/9d0e209d50a1/11135_2017_513_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105c/5897493/9d0e209d50a1/11135_2017_513_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105c/5897493/9d0e209d50a1/11135_2017_513_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework.研究设计:跨学科研究框架的方法学
Qual Quant. 2018;52(3):1209-1225. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
2
Interdisciplinary Collaboration between Natural and Social Sciences - Status and Trends Exemplified in Groundwater Research.自然科学与社会科学的跨学科合作——以地下水研究为例的现状与趋势
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170754. eCollection 2017.
3
Scientific Training in the Era of Big Data: A New Pedagogy for Graduate Education.大数据时代的科学训练:研究生教育的新教育学
Big Data. 2017 Mar;5(1):12-18. doi: 10.1089/big.2016.0014. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
4
An idea to explore: Interdisciplinary capstone courses in biomedical and life science education.一个值得探讨的想法:生物医学和生命科学教育的跨学科顶点课程。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2022 Nov;50(6):649-660. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21673. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
5
Hunting down the chimera of multiple disciplinarity in conservation science.追寻保护科学中多学科融合的假象。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Feb;28(1):22-32. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12183. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
6
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
7
Leveraging Interdisciplinary Education Toward Securing the Future of Connected Health Research in Europe: Qualitative Study.利用跨学科教育确保欧洲互联健康研究的未来:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 13;21(11):e14020. doi: 10.2196/14020.
8
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
9
Education for a biobased economy: Integrating life and social sciences in flexible short courses accessible from different backgrounds.生物经济教育:将生命科学和社会科学整合到灵活的短期课程中,让不同背景的人都能够学习。
N Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 25;60:72-75. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
10
A critical realist synthesis of cross-disciplinary health policy and systems research: defining characteristic features, developing an evaluation framework and identifying challenges.跨学科卫生政策和系统研究的关键现实主义综合:定义特征、制定评估框架和确定挑战。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jul 14;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00556-2.

引用本文的文献

1
A typology of interdisciplinary collaborations: insights from agri-food transformation research.跨学科合作的类型学:农业食品转型研究的见解
Sustain Sci. 2025;20(5):1791-1808. doi: 10.1007/s11625-025-01702-x. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
2
Accelerating diabetes innovation for real-world community impact through interdisciplinary research: Who is at the table?通过跨学科研究加速糖尿病创新以实现对现实社区的影响:都有谁参与其中?
Diabet Med. 2025 Jul;42(7):e70057. doi: 10.1111/dme.70057. Epub 2025 Apr 19.
3
AI as an accelerator for defining new problems that transcends boundaries.

本文引用的文献

1
Using mixed methods research designs in health psychology: an illustrated discussion from a pragmatist perspective.健康心理学中混合方法研究设计的运用:基于实用主义视角的实例探讨
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Feb;20(1):5-20. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12122. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
2
Environmental sciences education at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich and at other Swiss universities.苏黎世瑞士联邦理工学院(ETH)及其他瑞士大学的环境科学教育。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 1995 Jul;2(1):56-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02987514.
3
US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research.
人工智能作为界定超越边界的新问题的加速器。
BioData Min. 2025 Feb 18;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13040-025-00429-w.
4
Developing a data repository to support interdisciplinary research into childhood stunting: a UKRI GCRF Action Against Stunting Hub protocol paper.开发一个数据存储库,以支持针对儿童发育迟缓的跨学科研究:英国研究与创新署全球挑战研究基金反发育迟缓中心协议文件。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Jun 5;8(Suppl 1):e002443. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002443.
5
"We don't really do doctors." messages from people diagnosed with occupational leptospirosis for medical professionals on infection, hospitalisation, and long-term effects.“我们真的不找医生。”这是被诊断出职业性钩端螺旋体病的人发给医疗专业人员的关于感染、住院及长期影响的信息。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 22;9(9):e19303. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19303. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Touching the (almost) untouchable: a minimally invasive workflow for microbiological and biomolecular analyses of cultural heritage objects.触碰(几乎)不可触碰之物:文化遗产对象微生物学和生物分子分析的微创工作流程。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Aug 3;14:1197837. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1197837. eCollection 2023.
7
Improving the Development and Implementation of Audit and Feedback Systems to Support Health Care Workers in Limiting Antimicrobial Resistance in the Hospital: Scoping Review.改进审核与反馈系统的开发及实施以支持医护人员限制医院内抗菌药物耐药性:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 11;24(3):e33531. doi: 10.2196/33531.
8
Interdisciplinary Research: An Important Contribution to Dementia Care.跨学科研究:对痴呆症护理的重要贡献。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Feb 22;15:317-321. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S350132. eCollection 2022.
9
Team Science: A Practical Approach to Starting Collaborative Projects.团队科学:启动合作项目的实用方法。
J Breast Imaging. 2021 Jun 16;3(6):721-726. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbab034. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
10
Bringing Together Robotics, Neuroscience, and Psychology: Lessons Learned From an Interdisciplinary Project.融合机器人技术、神经科学与心理学:跨学科项目的经验教训
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Mar 29;15:630789. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.630789. eCollection 2021.
美国的研究可能高估了软性研究中的效果大小。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 10;110(37):15031-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302997110. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
4
Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.用真话激励法来衡量可疑研究行为的发生率。
Psychol Sci. 2012 May 1;23(5):524-32. doi: 10.1177/0956797611430953. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
5
False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.虚假阳性心理学:在数据收集和分析中不披露的灵活性使得任何事物都可以被呈现为显著的。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
6
Advancing the science of team science.推进团队科学的科学。
Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Oct;3(5):263-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00223.x.
7
"Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences."阳性"结果在科学的层级中呈递减趋势。
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 7;5(4):e10068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010068.
8
Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.食品安全:养活 90 亿人的挑战。
Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
9
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.有多少科学家伪造和篡改研究数据?对调查数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
10
Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature.界定跨学科研究:对文献的批判性综述得出的结论
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):329-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x.