Aboelela Sally W, Larson Elaine, Bakken Suzanne, Carrasquillo Olveen, Formicola Allan, Glied Sherry A, Haas Janet, Gebbie Kristine M
Columbia University School of Nursing, 630 W 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):329-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x.
To summarize findings from a systematic exploration of existing literature and views regarding interdisciplinarity, to discuss themes and components of such work, and to propose a theoretically based definition of interdisciplinary research.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Two major data sources were used: interviews with researchers from various disciplines, and a systematic review of the education, business, and health care literature from January 1980 through January 2005.
Systematic review of literature, one-on-one interviews, field test (survey).
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We reviewed 14 definitions of interdisciplinarity, the characteristics of 42 interdisciplinary research publications from multiple fields of study, and 14 researcher interviews to arrive at a preliminary definition of interdisciplinary research. That definition was then field tested by 12 individuals with interdisciplinary research experience, and their responses incorporated into the definition of interdisciplinary research proposed in this paper.
Three key definitional characteristics were identified: the qualitative mode of research (and its theoretical underpinnings), existence of a continuum of synthesis among disciplines, and the desired outcome of the interdisciplinary research.
Existing literature from several fields did not provide a definition for interdisciplinary research of sufficient specificity to facilitate activities such as identification of the competencies, structure, and resources needed for health care and health policy research. This analysis led to the proposed definition, which is designed to aid decision makers in funding agencies/program committees and researchers to identify and take full advantage the interdisciplinary approach, and to serve as a basis for competency-based formalized training to provide researchers with interdisciplinary skills.
总结对现有文献以及关于跨学科性的观点进行系统探索的结果,讨论此类工作的主题和组成部分,并提出基于理论的跨学科研究定义。
数据来源/研究背景:使用了两个主要数据来源:对来自不同学科的研究人员进行访谈,以及对1980年1月至2005年1月期间的教育、商业和医疗保健文献进行系统综述。
文献系统综述、一对一访谈、实地测试(调查)。
数据收集/提取方法:我们审查了14个跨学科性的定义、来自多个研究领域的42篇跨学科研究出版物的特征,以及14次研究人员访谈,以得出跨学科研究的初步定义。然后,由12位具有跨学科研究经验的人员对该定义进行实地测试,并将他们的反馈纳入本文提出的跨学科研究定义中。
确定了三个关键的定义特征:研究的定性模式(及其理论基础)、各学科之间存在连续的综合,以及跨学科研究的预期成果。
多个领域的现有文献并未提供足够具体的跨学科研究定义,以促进诸如确定医疗保健和卫生政策研究所需的能力、结构和资源等活动。这一分析得出了所提议的定义,该定义旨在帮助资助机构/项目委员会的决策者和研究人员识别并充分利用跨学科方法,并作为基于能力的正规培训的基础,为研究人员提供跨学科技能。