Suppr超能文献

团队科学:启动合作项目的实用方法。

Team Science: A Practical Approach to Starting Collaborative Projects.

作者信息

Patel Miral M, Moseley Tanya W, Nia Emily S, Perez Frances, Kapoor Megha M, Whitman Gary J

机构信息

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Imaging, Houston, TX, USA.

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Breast Imaging. 2021 Jun 16;3(6):721-726. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbab034. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

A collaborative approach to treating patients is well taught in medical training. However, collaboration and team building in clinical and laboratory research may have been given less emphasis. More scientific discoveries are now being made with multidisciplinary teams, requiring a thoughtful approach in order to achieve research goals while mitigating potential conflicts. Specific steps for a successful team science project include building the team, assigning roles and responsibilities, allocating rules, and discussing authorship guidelines. Building a team involves bringing individuals together and developing a common research goal while establishing psychological safety for all members of the team. Clear assignment of roles and responsibilities avoids confusion and allows each member's contributions to be acknowledged. Allocating rules involves discussing how decisions in the team will be made, how data and knowledge sharing will occur, and how potential conflicts will be resolved. Discussing authorship at the start of the project ensures that the entire team knows what work must be completed for authorship to be obtained.

摘要

在医学培训中,对患者进行协作治疗的方法得到了很好的传授。然而,临床和实验室研究中的协作与团队建设可能较少受到重视。现在,多学科团队取得了更多的科学发现,这需要一种深思熟虑的方法,以便在减轻潜在冲突的同时实现研究目标。成功的团队科学项目的具体步骤包括组建团队、分配角色和职责、制定规则以及讨论作者身份指南。组建团队需要将个人聚集在一起,制定共同的研究目标,同时为团队所有成员建立心理安全感。明确分配角色和职责可避免混乱,并使每个成员的贡献得到认可。制定规则包括讨论团队将如何做出决策、数据和知识将如何共享以及潜在冲突将如何解决。在项目开始时讨论作者身份可确保整个团队都知道为获得作者身份必须完成哪些工作。

相似文献

1
Team Science: A Practical Approach to Starting Collaborative Projects.
J Breast Imaging. 2021 Jun 16;3(6):721-726. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbab034. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
2
Team science: A syllabus for success on big projects.
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jul 31;13(8):e10343. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10343. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice.
J Investig Med. 2012 Jun;60(5):768-75. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871d.
5
Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications.
Account Res. 2017;24(4):243-267. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
6
Authorship grids: Practical tools to facilitate collaboration and ethical publication.
Res Nurs Health. 2018 Apr;41(2):195-208. doi: 10.1002/nur.21856.
8
Conceptualizing Interprofessional Teams as Multi-Team Systems-Implications for Assessment and Training.
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):366-9. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077136.
10
The challenges encountered during a collaborative research project.
J Ren Care. 2007 Jul-Sep;33(3):139-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2007.tb00060.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams.
Am Heart J Plus. 2023 Jun 3;32:100306. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100306. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Transforming the practice of medicine through team science.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Sep 17;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00619-4.
2
Teaching Conflict Resolution in Medicine: Lessons From Business, Diplomacy, and Theatre.
MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Jan 25;14:10672. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10672.
3
The "Inter" Within Interdisciplinary Research: Strategies for Building Integration Across Fields.
Risk Anal. 2021 Jul;41(7):1152-1161. doi: 10.1111/risa.13246. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
4
Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework.
Qual Quant. 2018;52(3):1209-1225. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Promoting innovation: Enhancing transdisciplinary opportunities for medical and engineering students.
Med Teach. 2018 Dec;40(12):1264-1274. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1426841. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
6
Authorship and Team Science.
JAMA. 2017 Dec 26;318(24):2433-2437. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19341.
7
Are groups more rational than individuals? A review of interactive decision making in groups.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2012 Jul;3(4):471-482. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1184. Epub 2012 May 11.
8
What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2005 Oct;6(2):31-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x. Epub 2005 Oct 1.
9
Prevalence of honorary coauthorship in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jun;198(6):1247-55. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8253.
10
Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice.
J Investig Med. 2012 Jun;60(5):768-75. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871d.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验