Department of Restorative Denstistry, Federal Fluminense University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Adhes Dent. 2011 Oct;13(5):473-80. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19820.
To evaluate the influence of four surface treatments on the bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement to an yttria-stabilized zirconia (Y-TZP) ceramic material (Lava Frame zirconia).
Forty plates (8 x 6 x 1 mm) of a Y-TZP ceramic restorative material were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10) according to the surface treatments: control, no treatment; airborne-particle abrasion with 50-μm Al2O3; coating with an MDP-based primer; conditioning with Rocatec System. The ceramic plates treated with each of the four methods were further divided into 2 subgroups according to the resin cement tested: RelyXTM ARC (ARC, conventional) and RelyXTM Unicem (Ucem, self-adhesive). The resin cements were put into PVC tubes (diameter 0.75 mm, 0.5 mm height) placed on the ceramic plate surfaces. After water storage at 37°C for 24 h, the specimens were submitted to a microshear bond strength (μSBS) test at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min.
The surface treatments significantly influenced the μSBS (p < 0.05). For the four surface treatments, UCem presented significantly higher μSBS than ARC (p < 0.05). For both resin cements, the best result was produced by the MDP-based primer: ARC 15.9 ± 5.0 MPa and UCem 36.2 ± 2.1 MPa. The highest μSBS values were presented by UCem on ceramic plates treated with the MDP-based primer (36.2 ± 2.1 MPa) and Rocatec system (37.4 ± 2.3 MPa).
Irrespective of the surface treatment, the self-adhesive resin cement performed better in terms of bond strength to yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramic than did conventional resin cement.
评估四种表面处理方法对自粘接树脂水门汀与氧化钇稳定四方氧化锆(Y-TZP)陶瓷材料(Lava Frame 氧化锆)粘结强度的影响。
将 40 个(8×6×1mm)氧化锆陶瓷修复材料板随机分为 4 组(n=10),根据表面处理方法分为:对照组,不处理;50μmAl2O3 喷丸处理;涂布 MDP 基底漆;Rocatec 系统处理。用这 4 种方法处理的陶瓷板,根据测试的树脂水门汀进一步分为 2 个亚组:RelyXTM ARC(ARC,常规)和 RelyXTM Unicem(Ucem,自粘接)。将树脂水门汀放入(直径 0.75mm,高度 0.5mm)置于陶瓷板表面的 PVC 管中。在 37°C 水中储存 24h 后,以 1.0mm/min 的十字头速度进行微剪切粘结强度(μSBS)测试。
表面处理显著影响 μSBS(p<0.05)。对于 4 种表面处理,Ucem 组的 μSBS 显著高于 ARC 组(p<0.05)。对于两种树脂水门汀,MDP 基底漆的效果最好:ARC 为 15.9±5.0MPa,Ucem 为 36.2±2.1MPa。对于两种树脂水门汀,MDP 基底漆处理和 Rocatec 系统处理的陶瓷板上,Ucem 的 μSBS 值最高(36.2±2.1MPa 和 37.4±2.3MPa)。
无论表面处理如何,自粘接树脂水门汀与氧化钇稳定四方氧化锆陶瓷的粘结强度均优于常规树脂水门汀。