IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milano, Italy.
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jan;30(1):270-279. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06498-8. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
PURPOSE: The timing of psychological and physical recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction represents an open issue in current orthopedic practice. Several tools have been developed to evaluate these factors, with the most recent being represented by the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) return to sport injury scale (ACL-RSI). The aims of this study were to provide a validated Italian translation of the ACL-RSI in a population of sport patients, and to identify a possible correlation of the ACL-RSI score with the return to sport (RTS) time and the level of sport participation in comparison to the pre-injury one. METHODS: The Italian translation and cultural adaptation of the scale were completed using a using the "translation-back translation" method. A total of 130 patients were enrolled and completed the study questionnaires 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Randomly, 65 of them were re-tested for the ACL-RSI within 2 weeks. The internal consistency, reliability, feasibility, and construct validity of the Italian version of ACL-RSI were assessed and compared to Italian version of the KOOS, the Lysholm Score, the AKPS and the IKDC subjective score. Responsiveness was tested comparing patients returning to sport at 6 and 12 months. The Tegner activity scale was collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months to identify the level of activity after return to sport, in relation to the ACL-RSI score. RESULTS: The Italian adaptation of the ACL-RSI demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.953), reliability (test-retest ICC = 0.916) and feasibility, with no ceiling or floor effect. Construct validity was confirmed by the moderate to strong correlation with all the other scales (p < 0.0001). Slight and non-significant higher ACL-RSI score was shown by patients returned to sport at 6 or 12 months after surgery. Nevertheless, the ACL-RSI score at 6 months was significantly different between patients who returned and those who did not returned to the same level of sport activity 12 months after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the Italian ACL-RSI is a reliable tool for evaluating the psychological readiness for return to sports of athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction, especially when collected at the end of the rehabilitation process. Since the IT ACL-RSI used in this study is a faithful translation of the original English version, this finding can be generalized to other cultural contexts and languages too. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
目的:前交叉韧带重建后心理和身体的恢复时间是当前骨科实践中的一个悬而未决的问题。已经开发了几种工具来评估这些因素,其中最新的是前交叉韧带(ACL)重返运动损伤量表(ACL-RSI)。本研究的目的是提供 ACL-RSI 的意大利语翻译,并在运动患者人群中进行验证,同时确定 ACL-RSI 评分与重返运动(RTS)时间和运动参与水平(与受伤前相比)之间的可能相关性。
方法:使用“翻译-回译”方法完成了 ACL-RSI 的意大利语翻译和文化适应。共有 130 名患者接受了 ACL 重建,并在术后 6 个月完成了研究问卷。其中 65 名患者随机在 2 周内接受了 ACL-RSI 的重新测试。评估并比较了 ACL-RSI 的意大利语版本与 KOOS、Lysholm 评分、AKPS 和 IKDC 主观评分的内部一致性、可靠性、可行性和结构有效性。通过比较 6 个月和 12 个月时重返运动的患者来测试反应性。在基线、6 个月和 12 个月收集 Tegner 活动量表,以确定重返运动后的活动水平,与 ACL-RSI 评分相关。
结果:ACL-RSI 的意大利语改编版显示出极好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha=0.953)、可靠性(测试-重测 ICC=0.916)和可行性,没有天花板或地板效应。结构有效性通过与所有其他量表的中度至强相关性得到证实(p<0.0001)。手术后 6 个月或 12 个月重返运动的患者,ACL-RSI 评分略有升高,但无统计学意义。然而,6 个月时的 ACL-RSI 评分在术后 12 个月返回手术前相同运动水平的患者和未返回的患者之间有显著差异。
结论:本研究表明,意大利语 ACL-RSI 是评估接受 ACL 重建的运动员重返运动的心理准备的可靠工具,尤其是在康复过程结束时使用时。由于本研究中使用的 IT ACL-RSI 是对原始英文版本的忠实翻译,因此可以将这一发现推广到其他文化背景和语言。
证据水平:II 级。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022-4
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018-2-5
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020-8
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015-4
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017-1
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025-3-31
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024-2
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023-6-1
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022-4
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012-1-18