Brown Kimberly P
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 2018 May;36(3):317-324. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2345. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
Much has been written about how to conduct insanity defense evaluations, as well as how to operationalize the legal definitions of insanity. However, the insanity defense has never been categorized by a typology. This article describes a typology of six subtypes of the insanity defense: paranoid self-defense, "but it's mine," erotomanic stalking, deific decree, disorganized, and false report. Knowledge of these subtypes, while not all inclusive, can inform insanity defense evaluations, guide training, and potentially increase the reliability of forensic evaluators' opinions. In addition, such subtypes can generate future research regarding prevalence, interrater reliability, and associated features of the different subtypes.
关于如何进行精神错乱辩护评估以及如何将精神错乱的法律定义付诸实践,已经有很多著述。然而,精神错乱辩护从未按照一种类型学进行分类。本文描述了精神错乱辩护的六种亚型的类型学:偏执型自卫、“但那是我的”、钟情妄想型跟踪、神圣指令型、紊乱型和虚假报告型。了解这些亚型,虽然并非涵盖所有情况,但可以为精神错乱辩护评估提供信息、指导培训,并有可能提高法医评估人员意见的可靠性。此外,这些亚型可以引发关于不同亚型的患病率、评分者间信度及相关特征的未来研究。