• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

15 年间器官捐献活动的演变与效率:国际比较。

Evolution of Deceased Organ Donation Activity Versus Efficiency Over a 15-year Period: An International Comparison.

机构信息

Swisstransplant, the Swiss National Foundation for Organ Donation and Transplantation, Bern, Switzerland.

Organización Nacional de Trasplantes, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2018 Oct;102(10):1768-1778. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002226.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000002226
PMID:29677069
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The donation rate (DR) per million population is not ideal for an efficiency comparison of national deceased organ donation programs. The DR does not account for variabilities in the potential for deceased donation which mainly depends on fatalities from causes leading to brain death. In this study, the donation activity was put into relation to the mortality from selected causes. Based on that metric, this study assesses the efficiency of different donation programs.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 2001 to 2015 deceased organ donation and mortality registry data. Included are 27 Council of Europe countries, as well as the United States. A donor conversion index (DCI) was calculated for assessing donation program efficiency over time and in international comparisons.

RESULTS

According to the DCI and of the countries included in the study, Spain, France, and the United States had the most efficient donation programs in 2015. Even though mortality from the selected causes decreased in most countries during the study period, differences in international comparisons persist. This indicates that the potential for deceased organ donation and its conversion into actual donation is far from being similar internationally.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the DR, the DCI takes into account the potential for deceased organ donation, and therefore is a more accurate metric of performance. National donation programs could optimize performance by identifying the areas where most potential is lost, and by implementing measures to tackle these issues.

摘要

背景

百万人口的捐赠率(DR)对于比较国家间的器官捐献计划效率并不理想。DR 没有考虑到潜在的捐献能力的可变性,而潜在的捐献能力主要取决于导致脑死亡的原因造成的死亡人数。在本研究中,捐献活动与特定原因导致的死亡率相关联。基于这一指标,本研究评估了不同捐献计划的效率。

方法

这是对 2001 年至 2015 年的器官捐献和死亡率登记数据进行的回顾性分析。研究包括 27 个欧洲委员会国家以及美国。计算了供者转化率指数(DCI),以评估不同时间点和国际比较中的捐献计划效率。

结果

根据 DCI 和本研究中包括的国家,西班牙、法国和美国在 2015 年拥有最有效的捐献计划。尽管在研究期间大多数国家因所选原因导致的死亡率有所下降,但国际比较中的差异仍然存在。这表明,潜在的器官捐献及其转化为实际捐献在国际上还远远不够相似。

结论

与 DR 相比,DCI 考虑了潜在的器官捐献,因此是一种更准确的表现指标。国家捐献计划可以通过确定失去潜在捐献能力的领域,并实施解决这些问题的措施来优化表现。

相似文献

1
Evolution of Deceased Organ Donation Activity Versus Efficiency Over a 15-year Period: An International Comparison.15 年间器官捐献活动的演变与效率:国际比较。
Transplantation. 2018 Oct;102(10):1768-1778. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002226.
2
Deceased organ donation activity and efficiency in Switzerland between 2008 and 2017: achievements and future challenges.2008年至2017年瑞士已故器官捐赠活动及效率:成就与未来挑战
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):876. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3691-8.
3
International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation--2013.国际器官捐献与移植登记处——2013年
Transplant Proc. 2014 May;46(4):1044-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.138.
4
The Effect of State Policies on Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United States.美国国家政策对器官捐赠与移植的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1323-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2194.
5
Development of a multinational registry of pediatric deceased organ donation activity.建立一个跨国儿童器官捐献活动登记处。
Pediatr Transplant. 2019 May;23(3):e13345. doi: 10.1111/petr.13345. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
Organ donation in Poland 2006.2006年波兰的器官捐赠情况
Ann Transplant. 2007;12(2):5-10.
7
Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems.比较退出和选择加入制度之间的器官捐赠和移植率。
Kidney Int. 2019 Jun;95(6):1453-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.036. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
8
Deceased donation and organ transplantation in Mexico. Analysis of 12 years and seven strategic proposals.墨西哥的器官捐献与移植。12 年分析和 7 项战略建议。
Cir Cir. 2020;88(3):254-262. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.19001379.
9
Assessment of Organ Donation Potential From Brain-Dead Donors in Polish Hospitals Using Quality Systems: System Of Donor Hospital Transplant Coordinators and Web-Tooled System of Monitoring Intensive Care Unit Deaths.使用质量体系评估波兰医院脑死亡供者的器官捐献潜力:供者医院移植协调员系统和重症监护病房死亡情况网络监测系统
Transplant Proc. 2020 Sep;52(7):2007-2010. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.130. Epub 2020 May 10.
10
A 10-year analysis of organ donor referrals to a South African tertiary public sector hospital.南非一家三级公立医疗机构器官捐献者推荐的 10 年分析。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Jan 29;110(2):132-134. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i2.14125.

引用本文的文献

1
Too uncertain to consent, too supportive to refuse: the sociocultural dilemma of hesitant organ donors in Kazakhstan.太不确定而无法同意,又太支持而无法拒绝:哈萨克斯坦器官捐赠犹豫者的社会文化困境。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 19;13:1602008. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1602008. eCollection 2025.
2
Donor Evaluation Tool: A New Technology Improves Donor Enrolment on ICU.供者评估工具:一项新技术提高 ICU 供者招募。
Transpl Int. 2024 Jul 26;37:12227. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.12227. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring the Potential of an Eye Tissue Donor Reporting App in Enhancing the Procurement of Corneal Donors: Mixed Methods Observational Study.
探索眼组织捐赠者报告应用程序在增加角膜捐赠者获取方面的潜力:混合方法观察性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 15;8:e50398. doi: 10.2196/50398.
4
Factors influencing deceased organ donation rates in OECD countries: a panel data analysis.经合组织国家影响器官捐献率的因素:面板数据分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 21;14(2):e077765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077765.
5
"A Delicate balance"-Perceptions and Experiences of ICU Physicians and Nurses Regarding Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death. A Qualitative Study."微妙的平衡"-关于 ICU 医生和护士对循环死亡后控制性捐赠的看法和经验。一项定性研究。
Transpl Int. 2022 Sep 6;35:10648. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10648. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparing Deceased Organ Donation Performance in Two Countries that Use Different Metrics: Comparing Apples With Apples.比较使用不同指标的两个国家的器官捐献表现:将苹果与苹果进行比较。
Transpl Int. 2022 May 13;35:10461. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10461. eCollection 2022.
7
[Organ donation-Not only a responsibility of intensive care medicine].[器官捐献——不仅是重症医学的责任]
Anaesthesist. 2022 Apr;71(4):311-317. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-01066-8. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
NOA method - three dimensions in the governance of kidney transplantation: --, how to engage them?NOA方法——肾移植治理的三个维度:——,如何让他们参与进来?
MethodsX. 2021 Oct 9;8:101542. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101542. eCollection 2021.
9
US deceased kidney transplantation: Estimated GFR, donor age and KDPI association with graft survival.美国已故者肾移植:估计的肾小球滤过率、供体年龄及肾脏供体风险指数与移植物存活的关联
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 23;37:100980. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100980. eCollection 2021 Jul.
10
Governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies.器官获取政策的治理质量指标。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252686. eCollection 2021.