FiloLab-UGR, Philosophy I Department, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
ELPAT-ESOT Public Issues Working Group, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252686. eCollection 2021.
Consent policies for post-mortem organ procurement (OP) vary throughout Europe, and yet no studies have empirically evaluated the ethical implications of contrasting consent models. To fill this gap, we introduce a novel indicator of governance quality based on the ideal of informed support, and examine national differences on this measure through a quantitative survey of OP policy informedness and preferences in seven European countries.
Between 2017-2019, we conducted a convenience sample survey of students (n = 2006) in Austria (AT), Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), Germany (DE), Greece (GR), Slovenia (SI) and Spain (ES), asking participants about their donation preferences, as well as their beliefs and views about the policy in place. From these measures, we computed indices of informedness, policy support, and fulfilment of unexpressed preferences, which we compared across countries and consent systems.
Our study introduces a tool for analyzing policy governance in the context of OP. Wide variation in policy awareness was observed: Most respondents in DK, DE, AT and BE correctly identified the policy in place, while those in SI, GR and ES did not. Respondents in opt-out countries (AT, BE, ES and GR) tended to support the policy in place (with one exception, i.e., SI), whereas those in opt-in countries (DE and DK) overwhelmingly opposed it. These results reveal stark differences in governance quality across countries and consent policies: We found a preponderance of informed opposition in opt-in countries and a general tendency towards support-either informed or uninformed-in opt-out countries. We also found informed divergence in opt-in countries and a tendency for convergence-either informed or uninformed-among opt-out countries.
Our study offers a novel tool for analyzing governance quality and illustrates, in the context of OP, how the strengths and weaknesses of different policy implementations can be estimated and compared using quantitative survey data.
欧洲各国的死后器官获取(OP)同意政策存在差异,但尚无研究从实证角度评估对比同意模式的伦理含义。为填补这一空白,我们引入了一个新的治理质量指标,该指标基于知情支持的理念,并通过对七个欧洲国家的 OP 政策了解程度和偏好进行定量调查,来检验该指标在各国之间的差异。
在 2017 年至 2019 年期间,我们对奥地利(AT)、比利时(BE)、丹麦(DK)、德国(DE)、希腊(GR)、斯洛文尼亚(SI)和西班牙(ES)的学生进行了便利抽样调查(n=2006),询问参与者他们的捐赠偏好,以及他们对现行政策的信念和看法。根据这些措施,我们计算了知情程度、政策支持和未表达偏好的实现指数,并比较了各国和同意制度之间的差异。
我们的研究引入了一种用于分析 OP 背景下政策治理的工具。政策意识存在广泛差异:DK、DE、AT 和 BE 的大多数受访者正确识别了现行政策,而 SI、GR 和 ES 的受访者则没有。在选择退出国家(AT、BE、ES 和 GR)中,倾向于支持现行政策(只有一个例外,即 SI),而在选择加入国家(DE 和 DK)中,绝大多数人反对该政策。这些结果揭示了各国和同意政策之间治理质量的明显差异:我们发现,选择加入国家中存在知情反对的倾向,而选择退出国家中则普遍存在支持(无论是知情还是不知情)的倾向。我们还发现,选择加入国家中存在知情分歧,而选择退出国家中则存在趋同倾向(无论是知情还是不知情)。
我们的研究提供了一种分析治理质量的新工具,并在 OP 背景下说明了如何使用定量调查数据来估计和比较不同政策实施的优缺点。