Singh Leher, Fu Charlene S L, Seet Xian Hui, Tong Ashley P Y, Wang Joelle L, Best Catherine T
Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117570, Singapore.
Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117570, Singapore.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Sep;173:59-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.012.
Most languages use lexical tone to discriminate the meanings of words. There has been recent interest in tracking the development of tone categories during infancy. These studies have focused largely on monolingual infants learning either a tone language or a non-tone language. It remains to be seen how bilingual infants learning one tone language (e.g., Mandarin) and one non-tone language (e.g., English) discriminate tones. Here, we examined infants' discrimination of two Mandarin tones pairs: one salient and one subtle. Discrimination was investigated in three groups: Mandarin-English bilinguals, English monolinguals, and Mandarin monolinguals at 6 months and 9 months of age in a cross-sectional design. Results demonstrated relatively strong Mandarin tone discrimination in Mandarin monolinguals, with salient tone discrimination at 6 months and both salient and subtle tone discrimination at 9 months. English monolinguals discriminated neither contrast at 6 months but discriminated the salient contrast at 9 months. Surprisingly, there was no evidence for tone discrimination in Mandarin-English bilingual infants. In a second experiment, 12- and 13-month-old Mandarin-English bilingual and English monolingual infants were tested to determine whether bilinguals would demonstrate tone sensitivity at a later age. Results revealed a lack of tone sensitivity at 12 or 13 months in bilingual infants, yet English monolingual infants were sensitive to both salient and subtle Mandarin tone contrasts at 12 or 13 months. Our findings provide evidence for age-related convergence in Mandarin tone discrimination in English and Mandarin monolingual infants and for a distinct pattern of tone discrimination in bilingual infants. Theoretical implications for phonetic category acquisition are discussed.
大多数语言使用词汇声调来区分词义。最近人们对追踪婴儿期声调类别的发展很感兴趣。这些研究主要集中在学习声调语言或非声调语言的单语婴儿身上。学习一种声调语言(如普通话)和一种非声调语言(如英语)的双语婴儿如何区分声调还有待观察。在此,我们研究了婴儿对两对普通话声调的辨别:一对明显的和一对细微的。在一项横断面设计中,对6个月和9个月大的三组婴儿进行了辨别能力的研究:普通话-英语双语婴儿、英语单语婴儿和普通话单语婴儿。结果表明,普通话单语婴儿对普通话声调的辨别能力相对较强,6个月时能辨别明显的声调,9个月时能辨别明显的和细微的声调。英语单语婴儿在6个月时对两种对比都无法辨别,但在9个月时能辨别明显的对比。令人惊讶的是,没有证据表明普通话-英语双语婴儿能辨别声调。在第二个实验中,对12个月和13个月大的普通话-英语双语婴儿和英语单语婴儿进行了测试,以确定双语婴儿在更大年龄时是否会表现出声调敏感性。结果显示,双语婴儿在12个月或13个月时缺乏声调敏感性,而英语单语婴儿在12个月或13个月时对明显的和细微的普通话声调对比都很敏感。我们的研究结果为英语和普通话单语婴儿在普通话声调辨别上与年龄相关的趋同以及双语婴儿独特的声调辨别模式提供了证据。文中还讨论了对语音类别习得的理论意义。