• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单语能力的局限?单语和双语婴儿在新单词学习中整合词汇声调能力的比较。

Limits on Monolingualism? A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Infants' Abilities to Integrate Lexical Tone in Novel Word Learning.

作者信息

Singh Leher, Poh Felicia L S, Fu Charlene S L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore Singapore.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 May 10;7:667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00667. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00667
PMID:27242584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4861728/
Abstract

To construct their first lexicon, infants must determine the relationship between native phonological variation and the meanings of words. This process is arguably more complex for bilingual learners who are often confronted with phonological conflict: phonological variation that is lexically relevant in one language may be lexically irrelevant in the other. In a series of four experiments, the present study investigated English-Mandarin bilingual infants' abilities to negotiate phonological conflict introduced by learning both a tone and a non-tone language. In a novel word learning task, bilingual children were tested on their sensitivity to tone variation in English and Mandarin contexts. Their abilities to interpret tone variation in a language-dependent manner were compared to those of monolingual Mandarin learning infants. Results demonstrated that at 12-13 months, bilingual infants demonstrated the ability to bind tone to word meanings in Mandarin, but to disregard tone variation when learning new words in English. In contrast, monolingual learners of Mandarin did not show evidence of integrating tones into word meanings in Mandarin at the same age even though they were learning a tone language. However, a tone discrimination paradigm confirmed that monolingual Mandarin learning infants were able to tell these tones apart at 12-13 months under a different set of conditions. Later, at 17-18 months, monolingual Mandarin learners were able to bind tone variation to word meanings when learning new words. Our findings are discussed in terms of cognitive adaptations associated with bilingualism that may ease the negotiation of phonological conflict and facilitate precocious uptake of certain properties of each language.

摘要

为构建他们的第一个词汇表,婴儿必须确定母语语音变化与词义之间的关系。对于经常面临语音冲突的双语学习者来说,这个过程可能更为复杂:一种语言中与词汇相关的语音变化在另一种语言中可能与词汇无关。在一系列四项实验中,本研究调查了英-汉双语婴儿应对因学习有声调语言和无声调语言而产生的语音冲突的能力。在一项新颖的单词学习任务中,对双语儿童在英语和汉语语境中对声调变化的敏感度进行了测试。将他们以语言依赖方式解释声调变化的能力与单语汉语学习婴儿的能力进行了比较。结果表明,在12至13个月时,双语婴儿表现出在汉语中将声调与词义联系起来的能力,但在学习英语新词时会忽略声调变化。相比之下,单语汉语学习者在相同年龄时,即使他们正在学习一种有声调的语言,也没有表现出将声调整合到汉语词义中的迹象。然而,一种声调辨别范式证实,单语汉语学习婴儿在12至13个月时在不同的条件下能够区分这些声调。后来,在17至18个月时,单语汉语学习者在学习新词时能够将声调变化与词义联系起来。我们从与双语相关的认知适应方面讨论了我们的发现,这些适应可能会缓解语音冲突的协商,并促进对每种语言某些特性的早熟吸收。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/9167940e33b4/fpsyg-07-00667-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/b902e1504273/fpsyg-07-00667-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/d41bb1d8ecb2/fpsyg-07-00667-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/28d103eb13ff/fpsyg-07-00667-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/fe9453b62c97/fpsyg-07-00667-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/6799cd2dc771/fpsyg-07-00667-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/828ec6d90379/fpsyg-07-00667-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/9167940e33b4/fpsyg-07-00667-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/b902e1504273/fpsyg-07-00667-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/d41bb1d8ecb2/fpsyg-07-00667-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/28d103eb13ff/fpsyg-07-00667-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/fe9453b62c97/fpsyg-07-00667-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/6799cd2dc771/fpsyg-07-00667-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/828ec6d90379/fpsyg-07-00667-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87e6/4861728/9167940e33b4/fpsyg-07-00667-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Limits on Monolingualism? A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Infants' Abilities to Integrate Lexical Tone in Novel Word Learning.单语能力的局限?单语和双语婴儿在新单词学习中整合词汇声调能力的比较。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 10;7:667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00667. eCollection 2016.
2
Developmental change in tone perception in Mandarin monolingual, English monolingual, and Mandarin-English bilingual infants: Divergences between monolingual and bilingual learners.普通话单语、英语单语和普通话-英语双语婴儿语调感知的发展变化:单语和双语学习者之间的差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Sep;173:59-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.012.
3
Constraints on Tone Sensitivity in Novel Word Learning by Monolingual and Bilingual Infants: Tone Properties Are More Influential than Tone Familiarity.单语和双语婴儿在新单词学习中对声调敏感性的限制:声调属性比声调熟悉度更具影响力。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;8:2190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02190. eCollection 2017.
4
Vowels, consonants, and lexical tones: Sensitivity to phonological variation in monolingual Mandarin and bilingual English-Mandarin toddlers.元音、辅音和声调:单语普通话幼儿及双语英普幼儿对语音变化的敏感度
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;159:16-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
5
Corrigendum: Limits on Monolingualism? A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Infants' Abilities to Integrate Lexical Tone in Novel Word Learning.勘误:对单语主义的限制?单语和双语婴儿在新词学习中整合词汇声调能力的比较。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;7:992. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00992. eCollection 2016.
6
Vowel, consonant, and tone variation exert asymmetrical effects on spoken word recognition: Evidence from 6-year-old monolingual and bilingual learners of Mandarin.元音、辅音和声调变化对口语词汇识别有非对称影响:来自 6 岁单语和双语普通话学习者的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;189:104698. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104698. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
7
Monolingual and Bilingual Infants' Ability to Use Non-native Tone for Word Learning Deteriorates by the Second Year After Birth.单语和双语婴儿利用非母语声调进行词汇学习的能力在出生后第二年逐渐下降。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 15;9:117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00117. eCollection 2018.
8
The Influence of Tonal and Atonal Bilingualism on Children's Lexical and Non-Lexical Tone Perception.双语声调和非声调对儿童词汇和非词汇声调感知的影响。
Lang Speech. 2020 Jun;63(2):221-241. doi: 10.1177/0023830919834679. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
Influences of lexical tone and pitch on word recognition in bilingual infants.双语婴儿的词重音和音高对单词识别的影响。
Cognition. 2012 Aug;124(2):128-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
10
Influences of vowel and tone variation on emergent word knowledge: a cross-linguistic investigation.元音和声调变化对新生词知识的影响:一项跨语言研究。
Dev Sci. 2014 Jan;17(1):94-109. doi: 10.1111/desc.12097. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Playing With Fire Compounds: The Tonal Accents of Compounds in (North) Norwegian Preschoolers' Role-Play Register.玩火化合物:(北)挪威学龄前儿童角色扮演语域中化合物的声调特征。
Lang Speech. 2024 Mar;67(1):113-139. doi: 10.1177/00238309231161289. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
2
Protracted Development on Native Tone Interpretation: Evidence From Mandarin-Learning Infants' Novel Word Learning.母语声调理解的长期发展:来自学习普通话婴儿新单词学习的证据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 5;10:1512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01512. eCollection 2019.
3
Lexical Tones in Mandarin Chinese Infant-Directed Speech: Age-Related Changes in the Second Year of Life.

本文引用的文献

1
Object Familiarity Enhances Infants' Use of Phonetic Detail in Novel Words.物体熟悉度增强婴儿对新单词语音细节的运用。
Infancy. 2012 May;17(3):339-353. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00080.x. Epub 2011 May 19.
2
A Bilingual-Monolingual Comparison of Young Children's Vocabulary Size: Evidence from Comprehension and Production.幼儿词汇量的双语-单语比较:来自理解和产出的证据
Appl Psycholinguist. 2014 Nov;35(6):1189-1211. doi: 10.1017/S0142716412000744. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
3
Can bilingual children turn one language off? Evidence from perceptual switching.
汉语普通话中对婴儿说话的语调:生命第二年中与年龄相关的变化
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 4;9:434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00434. eCollection 2018.
4
One Way or Another: Evidence for Perceptual Asymmetry in Pre-attentive Learning of Non-native Contrasts.无论如何:非母语语音对比前注意学习中感知不对称的证据
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00162. eCollection 2018.
5
What Can Lexical Tone Training Studies in Adults Tell Us about Tone Processing in Children?成人词汇声调训练研究能让我们了解儿童的声调处理情况吗?
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 23;9:1. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00001. eCollection 2018.
6
The Effects of Lexical Pitch Accent on Infant Word Recognition in Japanese.日语中词汇音高重音对婴儿单词识别的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 12;8:2354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02354. eCollection 2017.
7
Constraints on Tone Sensitivity in Novel Word Learning by Monolingual and Bilingual Infants: Tone Properties Are More Influential than Tone Familiarity.单语和双语婴儿在新单词学习中对声调敏感性的限制:声调属性比声调熟悉度更具影响力。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;8:2190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02190. eCollection 2017.
8
How Native Prosody Affects Pitch Processing during Word Learning in Limburgian and Dutch Toddlers and Adults.林堡语和荷兰语幼儿及成人在单词学习过程中母语韵律如何影响音高处理
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 22;8:1652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01652. eCollection 2017.
9
Perceptual Improvement of Lexical Tones in Infants: Effects of Tone Language Experience.婴儿词汇声调的感知改善:声调语言经验的影响。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 11;8:558. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00558. eCollection 2017.
10
More Limitations to Monolingualism: Bilinguals Outperform Monolinguals in Implicit Word Learning.单语制的更多局限性:双语者在隐性词汇学习方面表现优于单语者。
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 15;7:1218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01218. eCollection 2016.
双语儿童能“关闭”一种语言吗?来自感知转换的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jul;147:111-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
4
A New View of Language Development: The Acquisition of Lexical Tone.语言发展的新视角:词汇声调的习得。
Child Dev. 2016 May;87(3):834-54. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12512. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
5
Flexibility in Bilingual Infants' Word Learning.双语婴儿的词汇学习灵活性。
Child Dev. 2015 Sep-Oct;86(5):1371-85. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12392. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
6
Magnitude of phonetic distinction predicts success at early word learning in native and non-native accents.语音差异的程度可以预测母语和非母语口音的早期单词学习的成功。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 30;5:1059. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01059. eCollection 2014.
7
Perception of tones by infants learning a non-tone language.学习非声调语言的婴儿对声调的感知。
Cognition. 2014 Nov;133(2):385-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
8
Back to basics: a bilingual advantage in infant visual habituation.回归基础:婴儿视觉习惯化中的双语优势。
Child Dev. 2015 Jan-Feb;86(1):294-302. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12271. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
From flexibility to constraint: the contrastive use of lexical tone in early word learning.从灵活性到约束性:早期词汇学习中声调的对比使用
Child Dev. 2015 Jan-Feb;86(1):10-22. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12269. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
10
Metalinguistic Ability in Bilingual Children: The Role of Executive Control.
Riv Psicolinguist Appl. 2012;12(3):47-56.