Suppr超能文献

双语婴儿的词重音和音高对单词识别的影响。

Influences of lexical tone and pitch on word recognition in bilingual infants.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Cognition. 2012 Aug;124(2):128-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

Abstract

Infants' abilities to discriminate native and non-native phonemes have been extensively investigated in monolingual learners, demonstrating a transition from language-general to language-specific sensitivities over the first year after birth. However, these studies have mostly been limited to the study of vowels and consonants in monolingual learners. There is relatively little research on other types of phonetic segments, such as lexical tone, even though tone languages are very well represented across languages of the world. The goal of the present study is to investigate how Mandarin Chinese-English bilingual learners contend with non-phonemic pitch variation in English spoken word recognition. This is contrasted with their treatment of phonemic changes in lexical tone in Mandarin spoken word recognition. The experimental design was cross-sectional and three age-groups were sampled (7.5months, 9months and 11months). Results demonstrated limited generalization abilities at 7.5months, where infants only recognized words in English when matched in pitch and words in Mandarin that were matched in tone. At 9months, infants recognized words in Mandarin Chinese that matched in tone, but also falsely recognized words that contrasted in tone. At this age, infants also recognized English words whether they were matched or mismatched in pitch. By 11months, infants correctly recognized pitch-matched and - mismatched words in English but only recognized tonal matches in Mandarin Chinese.

摘要

婴儿辨别母语和非母语音位的能力在单语学习者中得到了广泛研究,研究表明,在出生后的第一年,婴儿的敏感性从语言普遍向语言特定转变。然而,这些研究大多局限于单语学习者对元音和辅音的研究。即使声调语言在世界语言中非常普遍,但对于其他类型的语音段,如词汇声调,研究相对较少。本研究的目的是调查汉语-英语双语学习者在英语单词识别中如何应对非音位音高变化,同时对比他们在汉语单词识别中对词汇声调音位变化的处理方式。实验设计采用了横断设计,抽样了三个年龄组(7.5 个月、9 个月和 11 个月)。结果表明,7.5 个月大的婴儿只在英语单词的音高匹配和汉语单词的声调匹配时才能识别出单词,因此他们的泛化能力有限。9 个月大的婴儿可以识别出声调匹配的汉语单词,但也错误地识别出了声调不匹配的英语单词。在这个年龄,婴儿还可以识别出音高匹配或不匹配的英语单词。到 11 个月大时,婴儿可以正确识别出英语单词的音高匹配和不匹配,但只能识别出汉语声调匹配的单词。

相似文献

1
Influences of lexical tone and pitch on word recognition in bilingual infants.
Cognition. 2012 Aug;124(2):128-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
2
Influences of vowel and tone variation on emergent word knowledge: a cross-linguistic investigation.
Dev Sci. 2014 Jan;17(1):94-109. doi: 10.1111/desc.12097. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
6
The Influence of Tonal and Atonal Bilingualism on Children's Lexical and Non-Lexical Tone Perception.
Lang Speech. 2020 Jun;63(2):221-241. doi: 10.1177/0023830919834679. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Electrophysiological evidence for the integral nature of tone in Mandarin spoken word recognition.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Aug;131:325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.031. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
10
Chinese-English Speakers' Perception of Pitch in Their Non-Tonal Language: Reinterpreting English as a Tonal-Like Language.
Lang Speech. 2021 Jun;64(2):467-487. doi: 10.1177/0023830919894606. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Probing the Impact of Prematurity on Segmentation Abilities in the Context of Bilingualism.
Brain Sci. 2023 Mar 28;13(4):568. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040568.
2
Mapping non-native pitch contours to meaning: Perceptual and experiential factors.
J Mem Lang. 2019 Apr;105:131-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
6
What Can Lexical Tone Training Studies in Adults Tell Us about Tone Processing in Children?
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 23;9:1. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00001. eCollection 2018.
7
The Effects of Lexical Pitch Accent on Infant Word Recognition in Japanese.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 12;8:2354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02354. eCollection 2017.
8
Perception and Representation of Lexical Tones in Native Mandarin-Learning Infants and Toddlers.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 21;8:1117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01117. eCollection 2017.
9
Tone Attrition in Mandarin Speakers of Varying English Proficiency.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Feb 1;60(2):293-305. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0248.

本文引用的文献

1
Infants' Listening Preferences: Baby Talk or Happy Talk?
Infancy. 2002 Jul;3(3):365-394. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0303_5. Epub 2002 Jul 1.
2
Age-Specific Preferences for Infant-Directed Affective Intent.
Infancy. 2009 Jan 2;14(1):77-100. doi: 10.1080/15250000802569777. Epub 2009 Jan 1.
4
Development in children's interpretation of pitch cues to emotions.
Child Dev. 2012 Jan-Feb;83(1):236-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01700.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
5
What paradox? Referential cues allow for infant use of phonetic detail in word learning.
Child Dev. 2010 Sep-Oct;81(5):1376-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01479.x.
7
The roots of bilingualism in newborns.
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):343-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797609360758. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
9
Is early word-form processing stress-full? How natural variability supports recognition.
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Jun;60(4):241-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.002. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
10
The first steps in word learning are easier when the shoes fit: comparing monolingual and bilingual infants.
Dev Sci. 2010 Jan 1;13(1):229-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00891.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验