Suppr超能文献

单 MBSAQIP 认证中心中减重后体重反弹和难治性并发症的再次减重手术:我们在处理什么?

Revisional Bariatric Surgery for Weight Regain and Refractory Complications in a Single MBSAQIP Accredited Center: What Are We Dealing with?

机构信息

Temple University, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

St Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2789-2795. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3245-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Revisional surgery is the fastest growing area in bariatric surgery, constituting 13.6% of all procedures performed as of 2015. This reflects a rising need to treat adverse sequelae of primary bariatric procedures. Despite the increase in revisions, their safety and efficacy remain controversial. The objective of this study is to review the experience of revisional bariatric surgery in our center and the relevant literature to date.

METHODS

We performed an IRB-approved review of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing revisional bariatric surgery between 2012 and 2015. Due to patient heterogeneity, we divided subjects into two groups: patients who underwent surgery for weight regain (WR) and those who underwent surgery to address refractory complications (RC) related to their primary bariatric procedure. Demographics, indications, and outcomes of each group were compared using Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney rank sums, and chi-square tests. We also divided WR patients based on their primary index procedure and analyzed them separately.

RESULTS

We performed a total of 84 procedures over 4 years. Forty-three patients (53.6%) underwent surgery for WR and 41 (46.4%) for RC. The variety and distribution of primary bariatric procedures were gastric band (40%), gastric bypass (35.4%), sleeve gastrectomy (22%), and vertical banded gastroplasty (3.7%). The indications for revisional surgery due to RC included gastroesophageal reflux disease, internal hernia, gastro-gastric fistula, marginal ulcer, excess weight loss, and pain. Overall complication rate was 14.3% (three early, nine late); there was one leak. Five patients required a reoperation (5.9%; two early, three late). Excess weight loss varied from 31.5-79.1% 12 months after revision.

CONCLUSION

Patients presenting to our center for revisional surgery do so for either WR or RC, most commonly following gastric banding. Revisional bariatric surgery can be performed with low complication rates and with acceptable 12-month weight loss, though not with the same safety as primary procedures.

摘要

背景

截至 2015 年,减肥手术中增长最快的领域是翻修手术,占所有手术的 13.6%。这反映了治疗原发性减肥手术不良后果的需求不断增加。尽管翻修手术的数量有所增加,但它们的安全性和有效性仍存在争议。本研究的目的是回顾我们中心减肥翻修手术的经验以及迄今为止的相关文献。

方法

我们对 2012 年至 2015 年间接受减肥翻修手术的所有患者进行了经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性数据回顾。由于患者的异质性,我们将患者分为两组:因体重反弹(WR)而行手术的患者和因原发性减肥手术相关难治性并发症(RC)而行手术的患者。使用 Fisher 确切检验、Mann-Whitney 秩和检验和卡方检验比较两组的人口统计学、适应证和结果。我们还根据患者的原发性索引手术对 WR 患者进行了分组,并分别进行了分析。

结果

我们在 4 年内共进行了 84 例手术。43 例(53.6%)患者因 WR 而行手术,41 例(46.4%)患者因 RC 而行手术。原发性减肥手术的种类和分布为胃带(40%)、胃旁路(35.4%)、袖状胃切除术(22%)和垂直带胃成形术(3.7%)。因 RC 而行翻修手术的适应证包括胃食管反流病、内疝、胃-胃瘘、边缘性溃疡、体重减轻过多和疼痛。总体并发症发生率为 14.3%(3 例早期,9 例晚期);有 1 例漏诊。5 例患者需要再次手术(5.9%;2 例早期,3 例晚期)。翻修后 12 个月的体重减轻量为 31.5%-79.1%。

结论

到我们中心接受减肥翻修手术的患者要么因 WR,要么因 RC,最常见的是胃带术后。减肥翻修手术可以在较低的并发症发生率下进行,12 个月的体重减轻量可以接受,但安全性不如原发性手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验