Barts and the London School of Medicine, Charterhouse Square, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, EC1M 6BQ, United Kindom.
Department of Histopathology, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom.
Int J Cancer. 2018 Oct 1;143(7):1720-1730. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31549. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
The evolution of precancerous cervical lesions is poorly understood. A widely held model of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) development is sequential progression from normal through CIN1 and CIN2 to CIN3. Another hypothesis, the "molecular switch" model, postulates that CIN3 can evolve directly from human papillomavirus (HPV)-infected normal epithelium without progressing through CIN1 and CIN2. To shed light on this process, we compared DNA methylation of selected human biomarkers and HPV types in two groups of CIN1: CIN1 that were near or adjacent to CIN3 (adjacent-CIN1) and CIN1 that were the principal lesions with no CIN3 detected (principal-CIN1). 354 CIN (CIN1 and CIN3) and normal tissue areas were dissected and typed for HPV from 127 women who underwent loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP). Methylation of genes EPB41L3 and the viral regions of HPV16-L1/L2, HPV18-L2, HPV31-L1, and HPV33-L2 were determined by a highly accurate quantitative pyrosequencing of bisulfite converted DNA. There was a significant trend of increased methylation with disease grade comparing normal to CIN1 and CIN3 (p < 0.0001). Adjacent-CIN1 predominantly shared the same HPV types as the CIN3, however, methylation differed substantially between adjacent-CIN1 and CIN3 (p = 0.008). In contrast diagnostically principal-CIN1 had an indistinguishable methylation distribution compared to adjacent-CIN1 (EPB41L3: p = 0.49; HPVme-All: p = 0.11). Our results suggest that progression from normal epithelium to CIN1 or CIN3 is usually promoted by the same HPV type but occurs via distinct DNA epigenotypes, thus favoring the "molecular switch" model.
宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)3 级(CIN3)的发展过程尚不清楚。目前广泛接受的 CIN3 级发展模型是正常宫颈上皮经 CIN1 和 CIN2 级逐步进展为 CIN3 级。另一种假说,即“分子开关”模型,认为 CIN3 可直接从不进展为 CIN1 和 CIN2 的 HPV 感染的正常上皮演变而来。为了阐明这一过程,我们比较了两组 CIN1(接近或毗邻 CIN3 的 CIN1[毗邻 CIN1]和未检测到 CIN3 的主要病变的 CIN1[主要 CIN1])中选定的人类生物标志物和 HPV 类型的 DNA 甲基化。对 127 例行环形电切术(LEEP)的女性的 354 个 CIN(CIN1 和 CIN3)和正常组织区域进行了 HPV 分型和组织学分析。通过高度精确的焦磷酸测序法对亚硫酸氢盐转化的 DNA 进行了 EPB41L3 基因和 HPV16-L1/L2、HPV18-L2、HPV31-L1 和 HPV33-L2 病毒区的甲基化检测。与正常宫颈上皮相比,CIN1 和 CIN3 的疾病分级呈明显的甲基化趋势(p<0.0001)。毗邻 CIN1 主要与 CIN3 共享相同的 HPV 类型,但毗邻 CIN1 和 CIN3 之间的甲基化差异显著(p=0.008)。相反,在诊断上主要 CIN1 的甲基化分布与毗邻 CIN1 无法区分(EPB41L3:p=0.49;HPVme-All:p=0.11)。我们的研究结果表明,正常上皮向 CIN1 或 CIN3 的进展通常由相同的 HPV 类型推动,但通过不同的 DNA 表型发生,因此支持“分子开关”模型。