School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia.
School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia.
J Chromatogr A. 2018 Jun 8;1553:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
With mass spectrometric detection in liquid chromatography, co-eluting impurities affect the analyte response due to ion suppression/enhancement. Internal standard calibration method, using co-eluting stable isotope labelled analogue of each analyte as the internal standard, is the most appropriate technique available to correct for these matrix effects. However, this technique is not without drawbacks, proved to be expensive because separate internal standard for each analyte is required, and the labelled compounds are expensive or require synthesising. Traditionally, standard addition method has been used to overcome the matrix effects in atomic spectroscopy and was a well-established method. This paper proposes the same for mass spectrometric detection, and demonstrates that the results are comparable to those with the internal standard method using labelled analogues, for vitamin D assay. As conventional standard addition procedure does not address procedural errors, we propose the inclusion of an additional internal standard (not co-eluting). Recoveries determined on human serum samples show that the proposed method of standard addition yields more accurate results than the internal standardisation using stable isotope labelled analogues. The precision of the proposed method of standard addition is superior to the conventional standard addition method.
在液相色谱-质谱联用检测中,共洗脱杂质会因离子抑制/增强而影响分析物的响应。内标校准法是最适合的方法,它使用与每个分析物共洗脱的稳定同位素标记类似物作为内标,以校正这些基质效应。然而,这种技术并非没有缺点,因为需要为每个分析物单独使用内标,而且标记化合物昂贵或需要合成,所以这种技术被证明是昂贵的。传统上,标准加入法已被用于克服原子光谱中的基质效应,并且是一种成熟的方法。本文提出了同样适用于质谱检测的方法,并证明对于维生素 D 测定,使用标记类似物的内标法和标准加入法的结果是可比的。由于传统的标准加入程序不能解决程序误差,我们建议加入一个额外的内标(不共洗脱)。对人血清样品的回收率表明,与使用稳定同位素标记类似物进行内标化相比,标准加入法的提议更能得到准确的结果。与传统的标准加入法相比,提议的标准加入法的精密度更高。