Ertani Andrea, Francioso Ornella, Tinti Anna, Schiavon Michela, Pizzeghello Diego, Nardi Serenella
Dipartimento di Agronomia, Animali, Alimenti, Risorse Naturali e Ambiente, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agro-Alimentari, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Apr 6;9:428. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00428. eCollection 2018.
Seaweed extracts can be employed as biostimulants during crop cultivation owing to their positive effects on plant performance. Therefore, in this study one extract from (A) and five extracts from (B-F) were assayed on maize ( L.) plants supplied for 2 days with 0.5 mL L of single products to evaluate their capacity to stimulate root growth and morphology, nutrition, and sugars accumulation. Firstly, extracts were chemically characterized via Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and FT-Raman spectroscopies, and their content in carbon, nitrogen, phenolic acids and hormones (indole-3-acetic acid, IAA, and Isopentenyladenosine, IPA) was quantified. The auxin like- and gibberellic acid -like activities of all extracts were also determined. FT-IR and FT-Raman spectra provided complementary information depicting distinct spectral pattern for each extract. Bands assigned to alginic and uronic acids were dominant in FT-IR spectra, while those corresponding to polyaromatic rings were evident in FT-Raman spectra. In general, extracts stimulated root growth, nutrition, esterase activity, and sugar content. However, they showed high variation in chemical features, which may explain their different capacity in triggering physiological responses in maize. Among extracts for instance, E was the most efficient in promoting root morphology traits, likely because of its elevate content in IAA (32.43 nM), while F extract was the highest in phenol content (1,933 mg L) and the most successful in improving plant nutrition. On the other hand, C extract was very effective in stimulating root elongation, but did not influence plant nutrition. B and D extracts induced similar positive effects on plants, although they greatly varied in chemical composition. extract (A) differed from extracts, because of its low content in total phenols and the presence of both IAA- and GA-like activity. We conclude that all seaweed extracts acted as biostimulants in maize, but their chemical properties appeared crucial in predicting the physiological response preferentially elicited by individual seaweed extracts.
由于海藻提取物对作物生长具有积极作用,因此可在作物种植过程中用作生物刺激剂。因此,在本研究中,对来自(A)的一种提取物和来自(B - F)的五种提取物进行了测试,将其以0.5 mL/L的单一产品形式供应给玉米(L.)植株2天,以评估它们刺激根系生长和形态、营养以及糖分积累的能力。首先,通过傅里叶变换红外(FT - IR)和傅里叶变换拉曼光谱对提取物进行化学表征,并对其碳、氮、酚酸和激素(吲哚 - 3 - 乙酸,IAA,和异戊烯基腺苷,IPA)含量进行定量。还测定了所有提取物的生长素样和赤霉素样活性。FT - IR和FT - 拉曼光谱提供了互补信息,描绘了每种提取物独特的光谱模式。FT - IR光谱中以与海藻酸和糖醛酸相关的谱带为主,而在FT - 拉曼光谱中与多芳环对应的谱带明显。总体而言,提取物刺激了根系生长、营养、酯酶活性和糖分含量。然而,它们在化学特征上表现出很大差异,这可能解释了它们在引发玉米生理反应方面的不同能力。例如在提取物中,E在促进根系形态特征方面最有效,可能是因为其IAA含量较高(32.43 nM),而F提取物的酚含量最高(1,933 mg/L),并且在改善植物营养方面最成功。另一方面,C提取物在刺激根系伸长方面非常有效,但不影响植物营养。B和D提取物对植物产生了类似的积极影响,尽管它们在化学成分上有很大差异。提取物(A)与提取物不同,因为其总酚含量较低,且同时具有IAA样和GA样活性。我们得出结论,所有海藻提取物在玉米中都起到了生物刺激剂的作用,但它们的化学性质对于预测单个海藻提取物优先引发的生理反应似乎至关重要。