Department of Orofacial Sciences, Division of Periodontology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences , Division of Biomaterials and Bioengineering University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
J Periodontol. 2018 Apr;89(4):379-387. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0466.
BACKGROUND: Advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) is an autogenous blood product with applications in dento-alveolar surgery. However, there is minimal information regarding its optimal clinical application or efficacy. The aim of this multi-arm parallel randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of A-PRF alone or with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in improving vital bone formation and alveolar dimensional stability during ridge preservation. METHODS: Forty patients requiring extraction of non-molar teeth and replacement with dental implants were randomized into one of four ridge preservation approaches: A-PRF, A-PRF+FDBA, FDBA, or blood clot. A-PRF was prepared at 1,300 rpm for 8 minutes. Non-traumatic extractions and ridge preservation was performed. After an average of 15 weeks healing, bone core samples were harvested at the time of implant placement for micro-CT and histomorphometric analysis. Ridge dimensions were measured immediately after extraction and before implant placement. RESULTS: Significantly greater loss of ridge height was noted in the blood clot group (3.8 ± 2.0 mm) compared to A-PRF (1.8 ± 2.1 mm) and A-PRF+FDBA (1.0 ± 2.3 mm) groups (P < 0.05). No significant differences in ridge width reduction were noted between groups. Significantly more vital bone was present in the A-PRF group (46% ± 18%) compared to the FDBA group (29% ± 14%) (P < 0.05). Bone mineral density was significantly greater in the FDBA group (551 ± 58 mg/cm ) compared to blood clot (487 ± 64 mg/cm ) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates A-PRF alone or augmented with FDBA is a suitable biomaterial for ridge preservation. This study represents the first randomized controlled clinical trial comparing A-PRF with and without FDBA to FDBA alone for ridge preservation.
背景:先进血小板浓缩纤维(A-PRF)是一种自体血液制品,在口腔牙槽外科中有广泛的应用。然而,关于其最佳临床应用或疗效的信息很少。本多臂平行随机对照临床试验旨在评估单独使用 A-PRF 或与冻干骨移植物(FDBA)联合应用于牙槽嵴保存时,改善骨形成和牙槽骨稳定性的效果。
方法:40 名需要拔除非磨牙并植入牙种植体的患者被随机分为 4 种牙槽嵴保存方法之一:A-PRF、A-PRF+FDBA、FDBA 或血凝块。以 1300rpm 速度旋转 8 分钟制备 A-PRF。进行非创伤性拔牙和牙槽嵴保存。平均愈合 15 周后,在植入种植体时采集骨芯样本进行 micro-CT 和组织形态计量学分析。在拔牙后和植入前立即测量牙槽嵴的宽度。
结果:与 A-PRF(1.8±2.1mm)和 A-PRF+FDBA(1.0±2.3mm)组相比,血凝块组的牙槽嵴高度损失明显更大(3.8±2.0mm)(P<0.05)。各组间牙槽嵴宽度减小无显著差异。A-PRF 组的活骨比例(46%±18%)明显高于 FDBA 组(29%±14%)(P<0.05)。FDBA 组的骨矿物质密度(551±58mg/cm³)明显高于血凝块组(487±64mg/cm³)(P<0.05)。
结论:本研究表明,单独使用 A-PRF 或与 FDBA 联合使用是一种适合的牙槽嵴保存生物材料。本研究首次随机对照临床试验比较了 A-PRF 与 FDBA 联合应用与单独使用 FDBA 对牙槽嵴保存的效果。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-4-29
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025-3-18
J Funct Biomater. 2024-12-14
Biomed Res Int. 2015
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015-3