Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, International Campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04478-1.
The effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation on bone regeneration and tissue healing has been thoroughly documented in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the peri-implant soft and hard tissue changes after alveolar ridge preservation using either platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) or freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) over a 12-month period following the prosthetic loading of implants.
In this randomized clinical trial, 40 individuals were recruited for alveolar ridge preservation using (1) FDBA or (2) PRF in incisal/premolar areas. At two follow-up sessions (six- and 12-months post-implant insertion), radiographic imaging and clinical examinations assessed marginal bone loss and soft tissue factors, including gingival recession and bleeding on probing. The differences between study groups were analyzed using Generalized estimating Equations, the Binary logistic regression model, and Cochran's Q test.
There was a statistically significant difference regarding gingival recession at both follow-up evaluations; values in the PRF group were considerably lower compared to the FDBA group (p < 0.05). The mean values for vertical marginal bone loss and bleeding on probing showed no significant differences between the two study groups (p > 0.05).
Except for gingival recession, applying PRF yielded comparable clinical results to FDBA after one year of implant loading and could be recommended as a potential biomaterial for alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extractions.
The research protocol was registered in the Protocol Registration and Results System on 13/08/2021, available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT05005377).
文献中充分记录了牙槽嵴保存在骨再生和组织愈合方面的有效性。本研究旨在评估在种植体修复负载后 12 个月内,使用富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)或冻干骨移植物(FDBA)进行牙槽嵴保存后对种植体周围软硬组织的影响。
在这项随机临床试验中,40 名患者被招募用于牙槽嵴保存,使用(1)FDBA 或(2)PRF 在切牙/前磨牙区域。在两次随访(种植体插入后 6 个月和 12 个月)中,通过放射影像学和临床检查评估边缘骨损失和软组织因素,包括牙龈退缩和探诊出血。使用广义估计方程、二项逻辑回归模型和 Cochran's Q 检验分析研究组之间的差异。
在两次随访评估中,牙龈退缩均存在统计学差异;PRF 组的值明显低于 FDBA 组(p<0.05)。两个研究组之间垂直边缘骨损失和探诊出血的平均值没有显著差异(p>0.05)。
除了牙龈退缩外,在种植体负载一年后,应用 PRF 产生的临床结果与 FDBA 相当,可作为拔牙后牙槽嵴保存的潜在生物材料推荐。
研究方案于 2021 年 8 月 13 日在 Protocol Registration and Results System 上注册,可在 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ 上获得(NCT05005377)。