• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

形态表示是从形态句法规则推断出来的。

Morphological representations are extrapolated from morpho-syntactic rules.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University, United States; NYUAD Institute, New York University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Department of Psychology, New York University, United States; Department of Linguistics, New York University, United States; NYUAD Institute, New York University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jun;114:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.015
PMID:29684397
Abstract

The field of psycho- and neuro-linguistics has long-debated the decompositional model of visual word processing: Are written words processed via the visual forms of stem and affix morphemes, or as complex wholes? Although many have now settled upon a decompositional view, it is unclear what heuristic the brain uses to generate these visual morpheme-forms in the first place. Here we conduct a magneto-encephalography study to test two hypotheses for how this may be done: i) the brain encodes representations of the morphemes that follow the morpho-syntactic rules governing constituents: A stem morpheme will be represented if the word obeys the grammatical behaviour associated with its suffix; ii) the brain only encodes stem morphemes that occur with multiple suffixes or as words in isolation. Our results indicate that words with morpho-syntactic wellformedness as stem-suffix combinations are decomposed by the system, thus supporting the former hypothesis. This suggests that knowledge of morpho-syntactic rules can be used to form morphological representations of written words, in absence of independent experience with all of their constituent morphemes. Possible mechanisms supporting this computation are discussed.

摘要

心理语言学和神经语言学领域长期以来一直在争论视觉单词处理的分解模型

书面单词是通过词干和词缀形态的视觉形式来处理,还是作为整体来处理?尽管现在许多人已经接受了分解观点,但大脑最初使用什么启发式来生成这些视觉形态仍然不清楚。在这里,我们进行了一项脑磁图研究,以检验两种可能的假设:i)大脑根据支配成分的形态句法规则对词干和词缀形态的表示进行编码:如果单词遵循与其后缀相关的语法行为,就会表示词干形态;ii)大脑只对出现多个后缀或作为孤立单词的词干形态进行编码。我们的结果表明,词干后缀组合具有形态句法合法性的单词会被系统分解,从而支持前一种假设。这表明,即使没有对所有组成形态的独立经验,形态句法规则的知识也可以用于形成书面单词的形态表示。讨论了支持这种计算的可能机制。

相似文献

1
Morphological representations are extrapolated from morpho-syntactic rules.形态表示是从形态句法规则推断出来的。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jun;114:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
2
Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the full decomposition model of complex visual word recognition.分解、查找与重组:复杂视觉单词识别完整分解模型的脑磁图证据
Brain Lang. 2015 Apr;143:81-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
3
A neuronal gamma oscillatory signature during morphological unification in the left occipitotemporal junction.左侧枕颞叶交界处形态整合过程中的神经元γ振荡特征。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Dec;35(12):5847-60. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22589. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
4
Sensitivity to morphological composition in spoken word recognition: Evidence from grammatical and lexical identification tasks.口语单词识别中对形态成分的敏感性:来自语法和词汇识别任务的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov;41(6):1663-74. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000130. Epub 2015 May 11.
5
Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition.视觉单词识别中整词与词素的并行加工
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(9):1798-819. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.672437. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
6
The suffix priming effect: Further evidence for an early morpho-orthographic segmentation process independent of its semantic content.词尾启动效应:关于独立于语义内容的早期形态正字法切分过程的进一步证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(1):197-208. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1031146. Epub 2015 May 20.
7
Masked suffix priming and morpheme positional constraints.隐性词缀启动与语素位置限制
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(1):113-28. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1027713. Epub 2015 May 8.
8
How the brain composes morphemes into meaning.大脑如何将语素组合成意义。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190311. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0311. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
9
Do 'blacheap' and 'subcheap' both prime 'cheap'? An investigation of morphemic status and position in early visual word processing.“blacheap”和“subcheap”这两个词都会启动“cheap”这个词吗?关于早期视觉单词处理中词素状态和位置的一项研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Aug;71(8):1645-1654. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1362704. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
10
Seeing stems everywhere: position-independent identification of stem morphemes.无处不在的词干:词干形态的位置无关识别。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):510-25. doi: 10.1037/a0029713. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Breaking down prefixed words is unaffected by morphological boundary opacity: Evidence from behavioral and MEG experiments.分解带前缀的单词不受形态边界不透明度的影响:来自行为学和脑磁图实验的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02758-7.
2
Early Form-Based Morphological Decomposition in Tagalog: MEG Evidence from Reduplication, Infixation, and Circumfixation.他加禄语中基于早期形式的形态分解:来自重叠、中缀和框缀的脑磁图证据
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Feb 16;3(2):235-255. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00062. eCollection 2022.
3
How the brain composes morphemes into meaning.
大脑如何将语素组合成意义。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190311. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0311. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
Prefix Stripping Re-Re-Revisited: MEG Investigations of Morphological Decomposition and Recomposition.前缀剥离再探:形态分解与重组的脑磁图研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 6;10:1964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01964. eCollection 2019.
5
In Spoken Word Recognition, the Future Predicts the Past.在口语识别中,未来预示着过去。
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 29;38(35):7585-7599. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0065-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 16.